Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I have a problem with my skyline R34 rb25det neo MT :(

I adjust TPS sensor to 0.5V (like in manual), but in consalt, flag "Closed TPS" is OFF.

How to learn TPS?

I hear, there is a way of 5 times turn a key to IGN, and back to OFF position.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/464370-how-to-learn-tps-in-stock-ecu/
Share on other sites

I'm not certain for R34, but on R32 there is a separate throttle closed switch, it doesn't use the TPS output. in any case the stock ECU wouldn't be adjustable.

Have you tested at what voltage/adjustment the throttle switch closes?

BTW what are you trying to fix?

I find a way to adjust the TPS!

First, you need to calibrate base idle to 600 rpm.

Next, you need to adjust the ignition timing to 15 degrees.

At last, rotate TPS to 0.5V, like an manual, and do following:

Key to IGN -> wait 5 sec -> Key to OFF -> wait 5 sec -> Key to IGN -> wait 5 sec -> Key to OFF -> wait 5 sec -> key to IGN -> check "TPS closed" flag in Consult. It will be ON!

You need to do 5 turn of key, or more with 5 seconds waiting.

Duncan, I want to calibrate all sensors to stock values (like in manual) :)

Before, my TPS closed at 0.42V.

f8de5e9409a54d5c914a7e5d266e4855.jpg

Edited by alekseymenkov
  • 1 year later...

i know this is a thread revival, but i (think) i have the same issue i.e. i cant get my ecu to understand the correct voltage to turn on the "throttle closed" flag, which is causing very high idle.  Can anyone else comment on how this learning procedure is supposed to work?  Turning the ignition on and off 5 times did nothing for me.  Consult is reporting that the throttle closed flag is only coming on at around 0.2v, which is too low to be in spec.

well i fixed it.  The 5 x on/off trick is what is necessary on a GTT to reset the ECU's threshold for "closed" throttle TPS voltage, HOWEVER, you must also meet the pre-requisite sensor conditions before starting.  For me, i had to wiggle my gear lever a little until the Neutral Indicator came on solid in NisDataScan, then the 5 x on/off worked.  My neutral switch must be on the way out.

I have also read (but cant confirm) you have to:

- be stationary (der!).

- have the coolant temp above a certain temp.

- have the battery voltage above a certain level.

  • 1 year later...

Does not work for RB20DET and is not necessary.

The RB20DET does not use the TPS potentiometer to determine closed throttle position. There is a switch. You can manually adjust the TPS position so that the switch actuates at the slightest opening of the throttle. Do that and you are gold. If you lean over the engine and open the throttle, you will hear the injectors double pulse. That's the ECU's response to seeing the TPS come off the switch. You want to hear that at the tiniest movement. Tiny.

  • 2 years later...

Major thread bump, for the RB26 (and likely the RB25 I'm guessing) the idle switch is a mysterious thing that somehow resets if you unplug the 5V supply (not the connector with the EV1 style metal clip) while the ECU is on. No need to do weird key tricks, no need to run the engine at all. Just turn the key on to get the ECU running, adjust the TPS to get the requisite 0.45V at idle, tighten it down, then unplug the TPS and plug it back in. It seems an awful lot like the ECU is using TPS voltage for idle detection but if you look at the R33 FSM it details how there's a physical switch in the TPS and that directly goes to the ECU for idle detection. I have no idea how that works.

On 2/4/2022 at 2:07 PM, Duncan said:

Yeah, I'm not sure why, but the stock ECU does use both a throttle switch and the TPS. Aftermarket ECUs just use the TPS so the switch is no longer required.

It was pretty curious, I noticed that the ECU basically doesn't do closed loop idle control if it doesn't see the idle switch. So it can idle low or high depending on coolant temp. I suspect it's also to help transient fueling control as well, it can be pretty hard to tune throttle tip-in just off idle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...