Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sure you can change engine numbers etc but the block is always going to be taller, unless you do a really good job with the cam belt cover then it is going to be noticable should you be required to go for a VIS.

...or you could actually get it engineered ;)

as to how a 300rwkw rb30det handles.. hmmm, i guess i will find out ....

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The real problem you face is that in sprints there are pretty much no rules. Apart from noise and tyres. So it is very difficult to set yourself guidelines.

Drag racing people have the right idea where someone will try to be "fastest GT-R with low mount turbos on street tyres" or something like that. Perhaps you need to set some arbitrary goal like that. Personally I think 220rwkW-250rwkW is plenty. It also is very similar to what a GT3 puts out.

Are 50kW more going to make your enjoyment higher? Maybe a little bit.. Are they going to help you become a better driver or just help you to wear things out faster? Power is addictive and it is fun, but for someone interested in track days I think that money is better spent elsewhere.

Driving a fast car fast is harder than driving a slow car fast. Flat out kinks become corners you have to brake for etc etc... So I do not deny that there is an advantage in making your car faster to help you become a better driver. But if money is a concern I would just build a reliable RB20DET and go through lots of tyres.

For anyone reading this and is going "Who's Ben and why is he so special?"

Quick Stats from my last track day with him:

Sandown Raceway

Reference - Lap record for GT Production (Subaru WRX STi) 1:21.41

My Lap record there = 1:26.7

On this day:

Quickest GT3 = 1:26.3 (there were 3 others as well)

Quickest Ferrari was 360 Challenge - 1:24.5 (full slicks)

Ben = 1:16.8

I don't know if SK has had his 600HP gtst down there for a comparison reference?

Snowy for interests sake, how many old Zeds are going faster than you, and isn't there a datto 1600 thats fairly quick? All are heaps cheaper options and RWD. When the GTR was supposedly king there were a few RWD cars actually quicker, the GTR used AWD launches to get in front and drive the ass off until tyres faded, then drive defensively. Winning races was the game.

There was also a Ferrari in the 1:19's I thought. The black GT3 was a lady as well I recall and her husband/BF was also driving that same car and was only about a second faster than my 195kmh limited ZR tyred 1:36.

All this doesn't change me wanting a GTR for the road, but as SK has posted in another thread, he is enjoying the simplicity and elegance of the RWD setup.

As an opinion, I think Bens setup in a R32GTSt stripped to the same level and tuned and suspension balanced would be a couple of seconds faster.

So he has 180hp more than the Ferrari, 220hp more than the GT3 and he is faster...

WOW! :D

Having more power doesn't necessarily mean you'll lap faster :Oops:

There's a hell of a lot more to it than power ;)

I will not turn my back on the old GTST, it may cheat a little with a bigger heart, but it is staying RWD...unless someone can convince me that a GTR wil be more fun to drive and more importantly noticeably  quicker around a track. ;)

thats all i'm trying to do :D

Correct me if i'm wrong but doesn't hte engineering have anything to do with it?

The GTR is heavier, but it also has the 4wd, a stiffer body, different wheel base etc... surely this has to play into it somehow as well?

Having more power doesn't necessarily mean you'll lap faster :Oops:  

There's a hell of a lot more to it than power ;)

I know that, I was just being silly...

But it does annoy me that people go on about how it was faster than a car that cost $300,000 as if it means anything. You canna change the laws of physics, apart from having GT in the name there is nothing at all comparable between the performance of the two cars... It seems people just want to point out their superiority in spending less to go faster. A sort of reverse snobbery

...My Lap record there = 1:26.7

On this day:

Quickest GT3 = 1:26.3 (there were 3 others as well)

Quickest Ferrari was 360 Challenge - 1:24.5 (full slicks)

Ben = 1:16.8

Ok a Carrera Cup car is lighter then a std GT3, but Porsche 911 Carrera Cup Lap Record @ Sandown is 1:14.76, so the GT3s in the 1:26 are being underdriven something chronic

But comparing lap times is so misleading....drivers are a huge variable. But hey are the sort of cars that make me think, if they can get traction why cant a 450hp RWD R32?

Geoff - that was the quickest Ferrari and the quickest Porka.

There is a Zed with an RB26 that does 1.22's, a datto 1600 with an SR20 that does 1.27's and there is a GTO (yes one of those boats) that does 1.19's (tunned by Ben funnily enough)

Most of the GTR's with 2530's do around the 1.22's. (all the guys I've seen with these though are good steerers)

Correct me if i'm wrong but doesn't hte engineering have anything to do with it?

The GTR is heavier, but it also has the 4wd, a stiffer body, different wheel base etc... surely this has to play into it somehow as well?

Only to some extent. As a stock car it is certainly a better starting point, but the extra engineering (call it complexity) means that when things go wrong, there are more variables to solve for and more elements to fail, when the handling balance becomes a problem, just where do you start in a 3 diff AWD complex system? The GTSt has some issues, but they are not as expensive to solve IMO and the track can be increased with good spacers, just the steering gets hard with the added scrub radius.

The V8SC's are a relatively basic piece of gear compared to the GTR's having now been up close to the Winfield GTR and helped work on the Ozemail cars. Was just to keep costs in control and the expense now is optimising the rigid spec.

I don't think there is any reverse snobbery about it if people want to go faster in a rwd car. It's your money guys, waste it however you like ;). Seriously though I do want a GTR, but choose not to put one on the track. The money is not an issue, I have just set my own goals, and being the technical type, try to do it better on a lower budget. I'm just embarassed there are old cheap nasty zeds kicking my butt...for now. I'll do it with the stereo on and the AC cooling me down :D

As for Roy's comment on the Carrera Cup cars, have you looked at the spring rates they run? SK would be having kittens they are that hard. No way they could handle much more grunt.

As an opinion, I think Bens setup in a R32GTSt stripped to the same level and tuned and suspension balanced would be a couple of seconds faster.

You are kidding yourself. The amount of development Ben has put into his front diff, rear diff & transfer case to get the 495awkw to the ground hasn't happened overnight. He's also the first to admit that with a professional steerer his car has a couple of seconds up its sleeve. Arguably the gtst may be more entertainment value for some but if the fastest way around a track was the gtst then i think Fred Gibson may have gone that route.

Geoff - that was the quickest Ferrari and the quickest Porka.

There is a Zed with an RB26 that does 1.22's, a datto 1600 with an SR20 that does 1.27's and there is a GTO (yes one of those boats) that does 1.19's (tunned by Ben funnily enough)

Most of the GTR's with 2530's do around the 1.22's. (all the guys I've seen with these though are good steerers)

Fair enough mate. I was remembering the times on the day from the results posted on the window at race control :Oops:

Still there's plenty of options. I'm still looking for the sponsor to pay me to get a GTS25t faster than Ben's white rocket. Won't be a fun daily driver then though.

Maybe i'm biased - never owned a gtst - driven a few, but not on track....

But if i bought a gtst instead of a GTR (nearly did), then id still have in the back of my mind 'when am i going to upgrade to a GTR'...

If you put the same mods on a stock gtst to a stock gtr, ie stickies on both, suspension on both etc etc... I still see the GTR being faster.

It seems people just want to point out their superiority in spending less to go faster. A sort of reverse snobbery

For me its nothting to do with snobbery, its got everything to do with engineering. Thats why i like V8 supercars, they engineer a car to do something that it should never be able to do.

Sure cars that come from the factory engineered to do track work are great, but i dont want to buy the engineering, i want to have input myself (The picture is becoming clearer now...im a frustrated mech engineer that wanted to work in motorsport not the pharmaceutical industry ;) )

ferni is on the same wavelength, the difference between the GTST and the GTR is less about the 4WD (How often do we see the torque gauge flying around on the track) and more about the chassis and suspension setup of the GTR, something a GTST can copy to good effect and not be burdened with the extra weight.

Still i dotn want this to be a GTST v GTR thread, but more the limitations of good power and RWD

Still i need Merli to tell me his GTR is quicker then his GTST or Steve, B-man, Doughboy to tell me there power is wasted around the twisties of a circuit (Doughboy dont bother just throw me the keys :D

Roy - 330 rwkw is more than enough power for circuit racing. I usually run on low boost (275 rwkw) - with 330 rwkw I can overtake most cars in 3rd/4th gear down the straight at EC - but when it comes to turns one and two they always get me on the brakes. I can only really use all that power down the straight. Aslo need a new pair of undies if I brake lateish....

At Wakefield I didn't even bother with high boost - low boost was heaps.

Traction is also an issue - semi slicks are a MUST.

Don't spend too much $$ getting big power - keep some for brakes, suspension, diff, and tyres and more tyres.

;)

Maybe i'm biased - never owned a gtst - driven a few, but not on track....

If you put the same mods on a stock gtst to a stock gtr, ie stickies on both, suspension on both etc etc... I still see the GTR being faster.

LOL.... thats why i hated not having my car at Winton, cause quietly i was thinking my car would have the Echo, and it wasnt too far off the pace you guys had by days end, and there was only 3 laps where i tried my heart out in the Echo and it was pretty quick :headspin:

Note: Echo is code for a car i should not have been driving

B-man, that the thing my car already has ok brakes, suspension and tyres.

Whoops, I sort of screwed up. I was comparing GT3 with GTR...

Sort of like

Skyline guy - "Hahahaha, look at you with your $240k GT3- "I beat you with my $100k Skyline"

Porsche guy = "ahhhh cool, but I've got a Porsche"

But I guess the same applies if you are comparing a GTS to a GT-R.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...