Jump to content
SAU Community

Ignition Timing for RB25DET Manual with Auto ECU


wadedos
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ignition Timing for RB25DET Manual with Auto ECU

I have a 1996 ECR33 GTS25T RB25DET which was a factory automatic. It has been converted to a manual but still has the auto ECU. The previous owner had apparently removed the CAS to supposedly check the cambelt, then installed it centre. Now my question is for you guys, is what is the actual base timing degree to set ? I have read that is supposed to be 10*,15*,20* for an auto ?

So what is the actual base ignition timing degree value to set for an auto ECU or is the same as the manual ECU ?

Thanks in advance :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Autos are set at 20°.  Manuals are set at 15°.  You can idle a manual at the auto ECU's 20° if you like.  But if you want to finish "manualising" it, back off the CAS 5° and the ECU should still hit all the ignition timing numbers in the map when you're off idle, so there is no problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers mate, I wasn't too sure. 

I have tried both 15° and 20°. When I had set the timing to 20°, it idled way better and crackled and popped when decelerating. But when flooring it, the turbo over boosted hard ? Like was hitting 9 - 10 psi at 5k+ RPM 
Then setting it back to 15 ° it would run better and hold the boost defined my by blitz sbc. But idled quite rough.

Is this normal for it to over boost when running 20° ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I just realised I told you a silliness in my first reply.

The ECU has no way of knowing that the base timing as set at the CAS is any one number or another.  So the manual ECUs expect it to be at 15°, and all the timing numbers in the maps are used as if it is set to 15°.  If you were to set it to 20° (at the CAS) on a manual ECU, then every timing point in the map will be 5° advanced.  Under these circumstances, it could well ping in the max torque rev range, which bashes the exhaust temperatures through the roof and it may well overboost.

In your case though, you have an auto ECU, and it fully expects the timing to be set to 20° at the CAS.  If you set it to 15° then it will be running 5° retarded everywhere.  This will be safe and boring.

The real question here though is.....what do you mean by "overboost hard".  9-10 psi is not very high, and if you have an EBC controlling boost, then you'd expect to be running 10 psi (being the sensible max on an R33 ECU).  There's no point having an EBC and trying to run the stock 7 psi.  So what exactly was it that you meant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My ECU is 23710-13U10. Which is an auto ? 

Over boost hard I mean by setting 7 PSI for the low setting on my EBC, it spikes to 9 to 10 PSI. Which is almost 3 PSI difference. I even tried connecting the wastegate actuator straight to the vacuum line and still over boosted.

With the timing set the 15, this never happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I know. I'm a bit unsure, and confused. It's just really odd.

I have just set it to 15 at the moment. 
Is this going to seriously retard it ? It actually seems like it pulls harder and sharper on 15, compared to 20.

How would I know if its pinging or detonating ? would it be audible ?

I have a Power FC with Hand controller, just haven't put it in as I would need to get it tuned, which seems a bit pointless with the stock injectors and turbo. Need to upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no problem with 9 - 10 PSI. I just cant understand when its set to 15. It will only boost to the desired set level perfectly. When set to 20, it just completely overshoots the set level around 4.5K. It would actually probably keep boosting past 9 - 10 PSI, but I will take my foot of as it starts to break up pretty quickly.

Sound to me like its missing ? Like it popping and cant boost any more. 
The missing problem is another problem for another thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the misfire and pop is anything to do with the timing, as at 15* on 9 to 10 PSI it still does it.

Just on 20* it overboosts way past the set boost. So I cant even floor the car to red line.

It will idle at 650 at 15* but hunts a wee bit. If I raise the idle, it is abit smoother. But the car is so loud. So I prefer it lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From now on read it as minus 5 and minus 7 instead of dash, and you're correct...
    • Opened up the cluster to inspect the gauge itself for signs of damage and it looks good. Got curious since that needle doesn't go back to a "neutral" position by itself (it stays in the same position when ignition is off. so I manually moved it to 1/2. Connected it back, turned on the ignition and the needle started moving up! Not sure what's up with that but before that the needle was way down below empty like fully south west. There's always a chance that the needle moved slightly the first time I tried and I didn't notice because of how slowly it moves and how far it was from the markings. I don't know if the current needle position is accurate so I'll fill it up and see where that brings it. I guess I'll try to adjust it manually if it doesn't get to F. Looks like the needle position is relative and not absolute? Thanks all for your help and patience!
    • You're confusing two different responders and more than one issue. The stock Neo ECU boost sensor is used by the ECU for protection purposes. It is essentially only an overboost sensor. It is not used for determining engine load for fuelling or ignition purposes. That task falls solely to the AFM. Any aftermarket ECU that either has an onboard MAP sensor or a plug in one, will use the MAP sensor as the primary load sensor. Or I should perhaps say "can", rather than "will", because some of them have the option of using other primary load sensors. That MAP sensor is not for the same function as the stock Neo boost sensor. The reason I recommended against a plug and play ECU is that they are intended to run a particular engine and usually in the car that the particular engine came in. So, if you have a transplanted engine in a different car, with some parts of the original missing (such as the boost sensor, for example) and therefore likely non-standardness of the loom and its insertion into the car's loom, then it is very likely that you will run into the same problems with needing to fix up wiring to make it work that you would with the stock ECU. And, if doing so for the stock ECU is enough of an obstacle that you start considering a standalone plugin as a solution, it should become clear that the plugin is quite possibly not the solution you'd hope it to be. It would just lead to more of the same type of problem solving work to get it going. In the above paragraph and in my earlier post, the lack of the boost sensor is not critical. It was just used as an example of something that we knew you did not have right, such that the stock ECU would not work. I took that as an indicator of a reasonable probability that there were other related problems hiding there.
    • I can think of two places in my city of <1.5million population that specialise in automotive instrument repairs.Unless you're out in the wilds of Quebec, you have 3 major Canadian and 3 major US cities within the same distance as the single nearest city to mine. Surely there is somewhere you could send it.
    • I never cared for twins but whenever these conversations came up, I always presumed the higher number represented a larger turbo. Learn something new everyday. 
×
×
  • Create New...