Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Lithium said:

Interesting, same as the 9.25mm lift 264s - so to confirm, they are definitely 260 advertised duration?

Yup, there was talk about going a 222/222 and that was actually going to push the advertised duration to 226 but drop the lift down to 10mm

From Kelford

 

Quote

I personally would run the 226° ones, given their slightly shorter adv. duration (it’s a design and acceleration thing that makes this the case)

 

Edited by SimonR32
  • 1 year later...

I’m in the same boat as well cannot decide between Tomei or Kelford. Will be using
Borg Warner EFR 8374 1.05a/r and NITTO's 2.8Ltr Stroker Kit. Car will be mostly street so looking for response.

Looking at these:
Tomei Procam 260Degree 10.8mm Lift
Tomei Procam 270Degree 10.8mm Lift

Kelford 182-S 274/270 10.55mm&10.50mm/10.50mm lift.

Kelford 182-C 272/272 10.00mm/9.95mm lift

 

But don’t quite understand how to compare the numbers dunces ones advertised ones vs actual...

Edited by etang789
35 minutes ago, etang789 said:

I’m in the same boat as well cannot decide between Tomei or Kelford. Will be using
Borg Warner EFR 8374 1.05a/r and NITTO's 2.8Ltr Stroker Kit. Car will be mostly street so looking for response.

Looking at these:
Tomei Procam 260Degree 10.8mm Lift
Tomei Procam 270Degree 10.8mm Lift

Kelford 182-S 274/270 10.55mm&10.50mm/10.50mm lift.

Kelfors 182-C 272/272 10.00mm/9.95mm lift

 

But don’t quite understand how to compare the numbers dunces ones advertised ones actual...

They are both advertised duration.

I would think at this stage more development has been done by kelford than tomei.

12 minutes ago, Ben C34 said:

They are both advertised duration.

I would think at this stage more development has been done by kelford than tomei.

On their website they haven’t showed anything new thou. Emailed them about that 182-X 260 custom cam

Let's rephrase that to more development in the last 15 years. Tomei are of the vintage of t51 and t04e turbos and old heavy dual valve springs . The world has moved on and cars are now running ethanol, single beehives and extremely efficient turbos. I'm not saying kelford has changed the game but things like the split lobe 274s would likely suit the modern engine better.

5 minutes ago, burn4005 said:

Let's rephrase that to more development in the last 15 years. Tomei are of the vintage of t51 and t04e turbos and old heavy dual valve springs . The world has moved on and cars are now running ethanol, single beehives and extremely efficient turbos. I'm not saying kelford has changed the game but things like the split lobe 274s would likely suit the modern engine better.

Do you have the beehives on your setup?  you must be rich.  Tomei A work on pro 270 10.8 just fine. Not over sprung and kind to the running gear.

 

yea they would be, but if you want a more agressive cam ramp they won't do the job. duration and lift doesn't tell the full story about cam design. there is another metric of the cam that is the average lift over the duration that tells more of the story about the cam profile.

also, worth noting the Tomei cams quote the lobe height and kelford quote the net lift. so they're both a 10.8mm lobe cam.

Edited by burn4005
2 hours ago, burn4005 said:

yea they would be, but if you want a more agressive cam ramp they won't do the job. duration and lift doesn't tell the full story about cam design. there is another metric of the cam that is the average lift over the duration that tells more of the story about the cam profile.

also, worth noting the Tomei cams quote the lobe height and kelford quote the net lift. so they're both a 10.8mm lobe cam.

Both Tomei and Kelford quote net lift(Kelford)  and valve lift (Tomei) which is the same thing mate. ie Cam lift - clearance

Unfortunately no one quotes you the area under the mountain which is "secret" , unless you buy me the Kelford cam and i will measure it and tell you as I already have the Tomei and a few more.

26_260_1025_32_33.pdf                          

182-X 260 10.25mm.pdf  

Edited by Meathead
incomplete
  • Like 1
On 11/5/2018 at 3:10 PM, Meathead said:

Both Tomei and Kelford quote net lift(Kelford)  and valve lift (Tomei) which is the same thing mate. ie Cam lift - clearance

Unfortunately no one quotes you the area under the mountain which is "secret" , unless you buy me the Kelford cam and i will measure it and tell you as I already have the Tomei and a few more.

26_260_1025_32_33.pdf                          

182-X 260 10.25mm.pdf  

Those 182-X are the custom ones that were made for me. @Piggaz check the sheet

Edited by SimonR32
44 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

Those 182-X are the custom ones that were made for me. @Piggaz check the sheet

How they working for you?

I asked for a custom 260 and that's what they offered...still not sure.

24 minutes ago, Meathead said:

How they working for you?

I asked for a custom 260 and that's what they offered...still not sure.

Out of the 5 sets of cams I've tried they are equal best response. 

On moderate boost levels they make the most power (but head is also now slightly ported), on high boost they make the most power (once again head is ported now).

Never apples with apples, but if I did it all over again, I'd be sticking with them

25 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

Out of the 5 sets of cams I've tried they are equal best response. 

On moderate boost levels they make the most power (but head is also now slightly ported), on high boost they make the most power (once again head is ported now).

Never apples with apples, but if I did it all over again, I'd be sticking with them

Interesting!   I remember reading you tried the staggered inlet cam 182s?  

Is the one you have now the first 260 you have tried and are you running suggested CLs?

Trying to wake my EFR up a bit earlier (260/10.25 Procams)  and tossing up between 182x or some 256 Reimax cams.

Which other cams did you try before if you do not mind me asking?

  

Edited by Meathead
21 minutes ago, Meathead said:

Interesting!   I remember reading you tried the staggered inlet cam 182s?  

Is the one you have now the first 260 you have tried and are you running suggested CLs?

Trying to wake my EFR up a bit earlier (260/10.25 Procams)  and tossing up between 182x or some 256 Reimax cams.

Which other cams did you try before if you do not mind me asking?

  

Staggered inlet were too big for my application (Precision 6262)

We started at centerlines they suggested, inlet got advanced a fair bit on the dyno. Exhaust stayed the same

Which EFR?

Grex unknown exact specs but around 9.1 260 or 264, Tomei Poncam Type B 260, Tomei Poncam Type R 250 and the Kelford 182-S

29 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

Staggered inlet were too big for my application (Precision 6262)

We started at centerlines they suggested, inlet got advanced a fair bit on the dyno. Exhaust stayed the same

Which EFR?

Grex unknown exact specs but around 9.1 260 or 264, Tomei Poncam Type B 260, Tomei Poncam Type R 250 and the Kelford 182-S

Thanks for the info, always good to know.  

I have the  8374 iwg, no E85 in Japan. Going to see how far my tuner can go with advancing the inlet next and other way on the exhaust.

If no joy will consider the 182x or some Reimax group A cams (264/9.7) or their street cam (264in 256exh), they run 105 CLs all around with quite a bit of overlap, have good reports over here for coming on well.

What size HG you have 1.0mm?

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I hope it's actually possible. This is a write off in insurance world.
    • Yup. 2-way with shallow ramp angles. Still works.
    • That was the first session so not a lot to take from the day. It was low 20s ambient and the coolant had got to 110 (and obviously had some pressure!) so that still needs to be addressed. I haven't downloaded the data yet but will. I had refilled the auto trans with Redline DT6 because it claimed the best viscosity I could find at 100o. It wasn't really long enough to get a good feel for that; while the trans got to 100o in the session it still wasn't shifting crisply as I hoped. I think I'll try a few more sessions before judging. No steering motor overheat but I'd hope not in only 1 session! But finally the suspension; it was night and day over the standard stuff and the car was a couple of seconds quicker on the same crappy tyres, which is a huge difference. I'll stick with that and get some sway bars and a mechanical diff sorted too and see how that all goes together
    • I guess it’s partially a compromise of how my car is used, wanting to be able to switch from drift to grip with track side on-car adjustment. Also partially with the way the knuckles are set there is more static camber but less dynamic camber gain. 
    • OK, so update from the track day on Friday It was a classic "an unfortunate series of events'. There were a few cars around and when i checked my mirror coming out of the fish hook I notice some smoke from the rear of mine. Looked again and it was getting much worse, I figured I'd blown a turbo or something to got off it and pulled off the racing line. However.... since it is a left hairpin into a right kink, I was on the inside of the next corner. There was a car passing me on the left and a big drop off over the ripple strip on the right......and someone had knocked the witch's hat that was on the apex about 1m onto the track. So, between those 3, I decided to mow down the cone and not damage my car/the other car. Right choice, but surprising result.  The car decided the cone was a small pedestrian so it blew the rear bonnet hinges up to protect their head in the upcoming person to car impact....I didn't see that coming and like an airbag deployment it happened super fast. Straight into the pits from there, everything was driving fine but it became clear it was a coolant leak not smoke, it was billowing up onto the windscreen. Onto the trailer and home. I'll do a separate thread about the repair (once I work out what it is ), but the immediate problem was the bonnet wouldn't open because the front was pinched onto the front bar and would not release. Ultimately we unbolted the hinge from the bonnet, pulled it back a little and it released from the front OK. "There's your problem", the top radiator hose had popped off at the radiator.
×
×
  • Create New...