Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

r33 gtst rear drag setup suspension

Hey guys just need some advice, have gone to heasmans to look at getting a proper rear suspension setup for my r33.

 

They have suggested a bilstein adjustable coilover, for drag and street use.

Im confused however, they mentioned the rears would have a rating of about 8kg, I was under the assumption based off other threads I would be moreso looking for  alower kg rating such as 4kg? I have limited knowledge about rear coilover suspension hence going to heasmans.

 

Just wanted some clarification before spending the money, Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/471450-r33-gtst-rear-drag-setup-suspension/
Share on other sites

That's a tough one.  It's not really possible to 2nd guess what their intentions are with that one part of the overall recommendation.  Having said that, I would agree with you that 8kg at the rear sounds more circuit spec than drag spec.  I would also wonder whether it is a good idea to use the standard valving on (assuming) B6s because they're probably not going to be happiest at those sorts of spring rates.  I might be wrong about that, but it does make for an interesting question to put to Heasmans.

Obviously you know you're looking to get some weight transfer on launch, hence the query regarding the 4-8kg range.  I have something like 5kg springs on the rear of my R32 with B6s and it's pretty immune to squatting on launch.  I realise that part of that is the R32 geometry, which is different to the R33, but nevertheless, it's pretty firm on launch.  Will break traction easily enough.

I would get something like 3~4kg, raise the car so the lower control arms are pointing nearly downwards or at the very least flat, followed by:

  • new subframe bushes
  • HICAS eliminator kit (not the lock car, the one that removes all the ball joints)
  • GKTech camber delete kit
  • Camber arms
  • Traction rods (extend them by 5mm, it will make a difference)

I've realised the shop that was mentioned aren't that knowledgable about suspension geometry or intended usage. A friend of mine that owns that S15 I often I drive at the track and tune took his car to said shop to get an alignment for the track. He asked them to adjust his traction rods and the guy was like I would just leave them at the stock position also he didn't know what they did. Then followed by the fact the recommended zero toe at the rear for a Nissan that's used for the track, we all know that Nissans suffer massive toe and camber ramp when there's any form of squatting involved.

Really odd experience - must have been a noob working on the day.

You really want that instant weight transfer and 'squatting' of the rear end, ideally OEM height, soft-ish springs, all new bushes would be ideal. If you want to step it up a game, get some drop spindles or knuckles as they're called.

If you look at fast street drag cars, they're never slammed on their tits neither are the rear springs very stiff either.

  • Like 2

I didnt end up going through with it, as you mentioned mate just didnt seem or feel right.

As you have suggested I do indeed have the following:

-Hardrace traction rods

-Hardtrace camber arms

-Hicas eliminator kit (ball joints removed) - installed by greaser :)

-hsd track orientated coilovers

 

Ill look into the camber delete kit and subframe bushes mate. Car is hooking up nicely on 275/50 MT ET R's. Just would like some nice squat + my left rear coilover is almost cooked

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...