Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I know I might get judged really badly for this but I need assistance. Like an idiot I filled up my tank with 91 octane because there were no other options since I was driving out of town (I live in a very rural area). I didnt get any issues initially and the car drove fine. However, today the car misfired and my check engine light is now on and is staying on. Could that be because of the fuel or would it be an issue with the coil packs? 

 

Please help. 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/472959-check-engine-light-on/
Share on other sites

running on 91 is perfectly safe assuming you were just pottering around. If you floored it up a hill and noticed but ignored the sound of a small rock rattling in a tin then you've likely f**ked your engine.

Is the car idling and running OK? Do you have 98 in it again now?

It's most likely not related to the fuel, but you still need to find out what the error code is.  Any local mechanic could put a scanner on it, or like Callan said there would be a tutorial on here somewhere on how to get it into diagnostic mode to tell you what the error is

I did floor it a bit. not completely and it was not uphill. The car misfired and since then I've only been driving really gently. The car runs fine for now. I haven't put 98 in yet because im still on a quarter with the 91 fuel. If i am right, when it goes to half, I could fuel up with 98 then to make it closer to a 95? I might give the diagnostic tutorial a go and see what pops up. 

Yeah, I'd fuel up at 1/4 tank with 98 and yes you end up with the average octane so that will be OK.

I've been caught a few times without high octane when I'm out and about and it's fine. Actually back in the day when I was out at Alice Springs for 6 months my old 33 ran on only 91 and it survived OK....you only need the whole octane rating at maximum torque / maximum load. So if you aren't flooring it up a long hill in 4th at full boost it's fine.  Aftermarket tunes are almost always less tolerant to make more power but factory is pretty safe.

So a quick update. I drove to work this morning and drove it gently again as i did for the past few trips. The engine light check went off on its own and hasnt appeared since. I'll keep on driving it gently and maybe after putting 98 in and waiting for a day or two, ill try to floor it and see if it misfires. 

 

That's my issue, i live in katherine and to get premium fuel here is quite hard. Only a few places provide it but after this has happened I definitely will ensure that I always have premium fuel in. 

If you can control yourself it's safe enough....its just hard to be good all the time :)

The quick option is to lower the base timing by 2-3o, that should make the factory tune safe on 91. Just need a timing light to do it correctly. Of course it won't be as crisp in the midrange but at least it will be safe on low octane

So update again. after two trips the engine light came back on. I stopped the car. started it again and drove for around 200 metres and it went off again. This has already happened twice today so I'm quite concerned. I did the self diagnostic as well and it came back with code 55 meaning everything is fine. Also topped up with 98 just before. How long would it normally take for the fuel to mix properly and make a higher rating? Not willing to floor it yet just in case I get more misfire and damage the car. 

Edited by Hacexd

well, that sort of depends whether it's actually on boost when the gauge doesn't work or not :P

a missfire can stop the engine running well enough to create decent boost.  Alternatively, an electrical issue like a bad earth, dying alternator etc could also cause a misfire. There's just too many reasons to really guess without more information.

Is your current situation that you have mostly 98 on board, you drove it 5 times yesterday, you haven't had a MIL for the last 3 trips, and it missfires? And where specifically does it misfire, approx which revs? And does it misfire if you free rev it or only when you are driving it properly under load?

If it is just light missfire in the mid range under load it is most likely a spark plug or coil pack issue. start by pulling the plugs out and checking their condition and gap. If the gap is over 0.8mm gap them down to that and see how that goes.

I might try to bring it to a mechanic on wednesday and see if they can find anything because as you've said, there are a lot of possibilities here. I filled up 98 when I was around half a tank on 91. No I haven't had a MIL for the few trips that I've done and yes it still does misfire. It probably misfires around 4.5-5k revs i would say. It only misfires when driving it properly under load. I do have to rev the car quite high to make it happen as well. The car just hesitates for a bit when it reaches the revs I specified and then after a few seconds it gets a sudden surge of acceleration like it should.

 

I was actually thinking spark plug or coil pack as well but at the same time, I just talked to the previous owner (I had the car for a week now) and I asked him if he changed the fuel filter and he did say that he doesnt recall when he changed it. So i might get the fuel filter changed as well and see the results. 

The only issue with all of this is knowing exactly what's going wrong and I hope the diagnosis will find out the specific problem. 

Thanks a lot everyone for your help as well. 

I had this once after switching fuel brands, all 98

I’d been running on BP for ages and then out some Mobil 98 in, and got the check light after giving it a bit

The code it threw up was the O2 sensor

It did it a few times but haven’t seen it since. That was about 4 years ago

So quick update again. Ended up getting a fuel injector cleaner. I put it in the fuel tank and fueled up with 98 again and dropped the psi a bit on the turbo and car is running fine. No more hesitation on boost at all. Potentially just needed to be fueled up again I believe. I would also like to help everyone for your help on this matter. I spent a whole week worrying about what it could be and reading about it day and night on every forums lol. All solved though. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...