Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all just getting my skyline on the road should be very soon

1993 r33 gtst

needs some panel work

just the normal mods

intercooler

3.5'' cat back

lower springs

19'' wheels

queen street custom paint

GTR front bar and wing

front bar in pic not fully on

Photo-0185.jpg

  • 5 weeks later...

hmm, im under construction.

R33 '95 GTST mspec

- xforce 3" turbo back

- greddy fmic

- power fc

- apexi pfc boost cont. kit

- k&n pod

- 19" shadow chrome rims

- HICAS lockbar

- strut braces

- z32 afm

Got a 400R kit, but its not on, atm its just got a GTR front and no skirts (special thanks to previous owner for the incomplete bodykit, awesome)

Got about $3k set aside for body, and will up the clutch/suspension/brakes/injectors/fuel pump/turbo upgraded in due time, probably in that order.

buy a 10k car, spend 10k on it.

hazah for bankrupt!

Edited by Sonuku

Well i have posted my ride in here before but the pic was sh*t. I now have a few better pics and few thing have been done.

you might have seen me cruzing around, as i also ways go for little drives all around the place.

Here are some pics:

post-39528-1219408752_thumb.jpg

post-39528-1219408760_thumb.jpg

post-39528-1219408769_thumb.jpg

  • 4 weeks later...

My new toy

R32 GTS-t M-spec

18 inch rims

intercooler

grey velour interior

full 3" zorst

short shift kit

momo steering wheel

tein coiovers

front bar trimmed to suit intercooler

slotted rotors

4 pot calipers (cuz it's an m-spec)

bleed valve (taken off at the moment for rego)

clearish indicators

at the moment she needs a bit of work...running pretty rich and there is a weird problem that autotech is going to look at on tuesday.

plus need new tyres

reverse switch is broken. going to be replaced this week.

had to get the cannon re aligned a bit because was rubbing on the fuel tank protecter and burnt a hole...lucky.

hopefully it doesn't cost me too much money but hey ive wanted once since i was like 14 so ill probly pour all my money into it :) haha if u see me...give me a wave :P

Mycar004-2.jpg

woooooo

MY BEAST.

MODS= bits here and there.

ive seen you a few times in woden. you may or may not have seen ZCR (silver32) and i (white chaser) a few times in woden aswell.

nice looking car, the eye lids definatly make it look pretty unique

  • 3 weeks later...

1993 Nissan Skyline R33 GTS-T

Heres the list of mods my car has:

Full GTR Body-kit including spoiler

18" starcorp racing rims.

3" Turbo Back Exhaust.

Apexi Blow Off Valve.

Front Mount Intercooler.

Heavy duty clutch.

Forged and polished pistons.

Turbo rebuilt by turbologics.

Engine block crank & head work.

flywheel machining.

PLENTY more planned!!

changing rims soon hopefully and the 18"s will be u for about $500 if anyones interested

post-56408-1223948615_thumb.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

I just bought a skyline last friday just gone ... only just signed up to this forum aswell ...

So here she is ... I have allways wanted a skyline ... was tossing up getting a R31 a few years back and gave up on that plan ... now a sweet R32 came up at a price I couldn't refuse so I bought it ...

Here she is ...

1992 HR32 GTS

RB20DE

Automatic .... (In future will be swapped out for a complete engine gearbox upgrade) but for the time being the auto is smooth as hell ...

Has a few mods done to it allready ...

Lowered suspention which is still as all hell

17" SSR wheels

2.5" catback exhaust with canon

Aftermarket rear swaybar

Front bushes have been replaced with nolathane bushes

Custom stereo install ...

Remote central locking , Alarm , immobiliser , remote start

Have some nice red/black Autotechnica racing seats to go into it in future there not the monza style ones ... there the new 08 model seats ...

here is a sideshot of it ...

skylinesideto5.jpg

w845.png

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally got some pics uploaded of my new skyline.

1992 R32 GTST type M. - 155rwkw - stock boost.

Black

Manual

130,000kms

ARC side mount Intercooler (good for 200rwkw +)

K&N Panel filter

Iridium platnum spark plugs

R33 turbo (std boost 10psi) std turbo also supplied.

HKS split dump pipe

HKS front pipe

Catco cat converter high flow

Trust PE11 power extreme cat back exhaust

Cam gears fitted and tuned for mid-range

Computer re-map by Dr-Drift

Oil cooler and filter relocater kit with modifyed inner wheel arch to allow more air flow

GTR Front brake upgrade

DBA 4000 Wiper slot rotors all round (near new)

New and upgraded suspension bush's fitted (Caster/front camber/pineapples)

Bilsteins shocks fitted front and rear almost new (Height adjustable)

Whiteline adjustable sway bars front and rear

Hi cas lock bar

Strut braces front and rear

Walbro fuel pump up-grade

GTR front seats (std ones thrown in)

turbo timer

3 point car alarm

Tinted windows

CD player with remote

PA190022.jpg

PA190020.jpg

Edited by livo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...