Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

I would really want a cast manifold for longevity reasons, bolt-on kit with heat shields, piping, etc all ready to go

You're American aren't you? It explains the difference in attitude. In Oz we like to actually make stuff from scratch. We can see from all the US car media that the only way to do something is to buy the kit, put on the nitrile gloves and fit it. I would rather an exhaust manifold that I fabricated myself than almost any other option.

And there's nothing wrong with low mount single turbos on GTRs if you're not trying to cram in a big one. For your power goal and stated desire to keep it looking a bit original, it would be a sensible choice.

And, just harking back to the question/point about why BMW choose to use twins......it's also all about the very modern control systems that they have for them. The twin turbo systems that came out on 2JZ and 13B after the GTRs simple parallel system were intended to widen the torque band, but suffered from having control systems that weren't really ready for the big time. Fast forward 20 years and the control systems that the OEM engineers can put onto them now are just stupendous. Plenty of processing power and fantastic actuators of various sorts. It's a different world. And it is a different world - meaning that it does not apply to clunky old GTR twin turbos. So the selection logic that leads BMW to choose twins does not carry over.

40 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Another reason I advocate buying a BMW M4, spend money on a flash, full TBE,  better IC and it would destroy any R32~34 GT-R around a circuit, and at the drag strip.

Because hey, no matter what @GTSBoy and I say you're going to refute it.

The easy way would be to link a kit for a low mount single that is bolt-on and keeps all the things I’m asking for.

I’m not exactly chasing after performance here either. The M4 has dead steering, sounds pretty terrible, and is kind of a pain to see out the front due to the tall hood from the charge cooler and pedestrian safety regulations. I also want the driving dynamics of ATTESA-ETS. It is extremely competent technically though.

  

24 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

You're American aren't you? It explains the difference in attitude. In Oz we like to actually make stuff from scratch. We can see from all the US car media that the only way to do something is to buy the kit, put on the nitrile gloves and fit it. I would rather an exhaust manifold that I fabricated myself than almost any other option.

And there's nothing wrong with low mount single turbos on GTRs if you're not trying to cram in a big one. For your power goal and stated desire to keep it looking a bit original, it would be a sensible choice.

And, just harking back to the question/point about why BMW choose to use twins......it's also all about the very modern control systems that they have for them. The twin turbo systems that came out on 2JZ and 13B after the GTRs simple parallel system were intended to widen the torque band, but suffered from having control systems that weren't really ready for the big time. Fast forward 20 years and the control systems that the OEM engineers can put onto them now are just stupendous. Plenty of processing power and fantastic actuators of various sorts. It's a different world. And it is a different world - meaning that it does not apply to clunky old GTR twin turbos. So the selection logic that leads BMW to choose twins does not carry over.

Yeah I'm a big dumb American. I don't know enough about this stuff to attempt to make a single turbo conversion from scratch.

I think the BMW S55 engine does have more advanced control systems but at the end of the day it's a parallel twin turbo setup like the RB26. They have neat tricks to play like fully electronic wastegates and soon 48V mild hybrid but the core architectural trade-off between a bigger single and small twins is still there. I suspect it's really a packaging, thermal management, and emissions problem for BMW but that's just me armchair engineering.

Edited by joshuaho96
56 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

   I would really want a cast manifold for longevity reasons,

Yeah I'm a big dumb American. I don't know enough about this stuff to attempt to make a single turbo conversion from scratch.

 

You don't really have to make it from scratch yourself.

There are shops in NZ (as well as in Australia) who could make a manifold from welded steam pipe (not cast and not thin stainless) which would support any of the well known modern turbos. They have done so many of these for every kind of RB that just with the details of the turbo you want to use and the car you have it could be shipped to you and would fit like a glove. Just two of these shops are RIPS       https://www.ripsracing.com/

and Sinco       https://www.sincocustoms.com/

and for you viewing pleasure the manifold I got in the mail from Sinco many years ago now:

wastegate.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Brooooo Please send ABS control unit schematic Please! R33 gts25t ABS (Its two plug ecu, black and white) wire colors possible? [email protected]
    • Don't even try to run it on the stock ECU if you're going to have the boost controller bring boost above ~10 psi. I've already told you that. If you use the Nistune ECU, you will need to CAREFULLY read the available documentation for Neo tuning, and read some threads on the Nistune forums, to discover the various things you have to do to prevent the ECU from going bananas when the boost is too high. The is a table associated with th boost sensor that must be modified to prevent it from shitting the bed. This is just one of the things that you will need to do to the tune in Nistune, because the Neo turbo ECU will be expecting to see a number of things (such as the TCS) that are not there, and you have to block the DTCs on those. It is totally not surprising to me that you are having the problems that you are, but the solutions to these problems have been known for >15 years. So just get it done.
    • Hi. Sry iam not a mechanic and iam not at the car atm so i dont know 100% but they told they measure those and even try to change those. AFM they have two. Coils are new a they have my old one too. Plugs too. ECU...we have 25 NEO stock and Nistune 25 NEO.   But i dont know if any one those could be the problem and why/if/what can cause this, Only thing they did not check is fuel...but that walbro 255 is new(like 1,5 years)... That fuel pressure gauge idk...but i let them know Any suggestions?   EDIT: how can they know if it is like you say he ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high? Tha car has boost controler
    • Can you clarify what you mean by boost cut, do you mean it misfires both when under load (driving) and when stationary and out of gear? Or does the ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high (boost control issue)? Does it occur at idle with no throttle? When you say "the ECU is OK", what ECU is it and why do you think it is OK? Have you used the NEO ECU, and if so do you have a MAP sensor attached? Same for the AFM, why do you think it is OK? Do you have any way to put a fuel pressure gauge on it (even just a mechanical one between the fuel filter and fuel rail)?
×
×
  • Create New...