Jump to content
SAU Community

BK, about time for a build thread ? - 1995 R33 GTR V-spec twin turbo


BK
 Share

Recommended Posts

R33 accepted into Elite show hall for display before Motorkhana, which will be going for its 3rd win racing. Going to ditch the drags in this car. It does 11.5 at 120mph so I'm done with risking any further drag racing related stone chips, as ASID track is very gravelly. Top fuel cars are going to hate it.

20220901_110547.thumb.jpg.9afb508ba3cf2df43e909222b12c4fac.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok RCN 08 is done for 2022, so I'll debrief here. The R33 GTR above won top Japanese car for the event in the elite show n shine component. The car is immaculate inside and out really for a 27 year old car with a genuine 81500km, hence the retirement from ever returning to a drag strip.

The racing for the weekend didn't quite work out as planned. The two 32 both ended up having issues at the strip on Saturday. White 32 shit a CAS restricting timing to a max of 5 advance, so as you could imagine it knocked the shit out of producing any power. I checked this after it's first and only run after it clocked a laughable 105mph 😆

Cue the blue 32. After a previous shakedown of 139mph, I put it back on E85 and was reading consistently over 70% ethanol content, so I decided to send it. I re-enabled launch control at 6500rpm and full boost at 32 - 33psi. Launched of the line at a not so great but ok 60ft of 1.82 and proceeded to smash through the gears until I lost power at top of 3rd when changing into 4th. Sensing something was wrong I backed out of the run at about 3/4 track and coasted through at 11.51 at 128mph. On further inspection let's just say something stopped the blue 32 from continuing on that day, meaning an early retirement from the strip on Saturday so we could try and rectify the cars for the Motorkhana event on Sunday.

After "fixing" the blue 32, swapping the crank angle sensor out on the white 32 and picking up the 33 we headed out to the Motorkhana with all 3 cars ready to race. The Motorkhana event on Sunday was bloody awesome with all 3 GTRs performing flawlessly with no problems unlike at the drags. My impression from the Sunday event:

-White 32 handles awesome and has a heap of power. The 6466 1.00 a/r is not too big for the 2.6 and was definitely very very responsive and great on / off throttle response. Amazing what the correct and accurate timing did for the car.

-White 33 performed as expected - It grips, turns, stops and has a great balanced power delivery. Nothing new there.

-Blue 32 🥰 What can I say.... Only thing to say is HOLY F**KEN SHIT !!!!! This car initially scared that shit of me out there as the power was frigging insane ! This was the car I drove the most on the day as it was just so much fun - I've never driven a car with this much power in an environment like this 👍After getting used to the 600kw + with the imposing concrete and water wall barriers, the car was awesome in its handling, traction and mind numbing power delivery - very confidence inspiring 😃

So in a wrap, the fastest GTR out of the 3 at the event was.....

 

THE 33 WITH THE TWINS !

 

After winning the 2020 and 2021 event I couldn't make it 3 years in a row, by a tenth, securing 2nd place overall from just one try in the 33. The 32s with the single 6466 turbos were just too aggressive with too much power on this type of track, but were way more fun to drive ! TBH I think the blue 32 COULD be the fastest with more skill and practice behind the wheel, but really just showed that the 33 was just a much easier car to drive fast on the limit. Overall a pretty successful outing considering there were no major failures during the event. First time for everything eh ? 🤣

Until next time 👍

20220904_132436.thumb.jpg.1c1d65ce74440b94aabf0dc3fa71a41c.jpg

20220904_132448.thumb.jpg.4ce4e99da690d6b1f63a5c035412013e.jpg

20220904_132525.thumb.jpg.a1a40c3aeb061acc852574ffc4a7ee1a.jpg

20220904_132511.thumb.jpg.3098c39bcac32a3d8877dc4ca4d0e268.jpg

20220904_132547.thumb.jpg.20e1d15554787403d946778c077d7602.jpg

20220904_132611.thumb.jpg.703e5868e4a6d11bdb6bc0d9359c1b11.jpg

20220904_132653.thumb.jpg.67e8df58c2b136d4d3776edbe7ad3b4b.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/09/2022 at 5:58 AM, Duncan said:

Sounds like you had a hectic but fun weekend.

And....

Of course twins > singles

Defintely hectic, but heaps of fun  Regarding the twin vs single debate it was a good back to back to compare pro and cons of each.

The biggest issue with the singles is they have soooo much power, which upsets chassis balance in something like a Motorkhana with such tight conering. When the twins come on the power is delivered in a much more manageable way. In any other situation the singles are the far superior choice as the throttle response and spool up is great, matching or exceeding what the twins were capable of but with much more power being harder to control for mere mortals like myself.

In my opinion, only power levels of 350kw or lower should twins ever be considered as an option, as the singles from here on do everything better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/9/2022 at 10:15 AM, BK said:

Defintely hectic, but heaps of fun  Regarding the twin vs single debate it was a good back to back to compare pro and cons of each.

The biggest issue with the singles is they have soooo much power, which upsets chassis balance in something like a Motorkhana with such tight conering. When the twins come on the power is delivered in a much more manageable way. In any other situation the singles are the far superior choice as the throttle response and spool up is great, matching or exceeding what the twins were capable of but with much more power being harder to control for mere mortals like myself.

In my opinion, only power levels of 350kw or lower should twins ever be considered as an option, as the singles from here on do everything better.

But you’re comparing a single that flows ~600 kw vs a 350 kw twin setup so of course the single is going to hit like a ton of a bricks, anything would.

Put a single on that flows 350 kw, the same as a set of -9’s and see what happens. 🤷‍♂️

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/09/2022 at 10:06 AM, Piggaz said:

But you’re comparing a single that flows ~600 kw vs a 350 kw twin setup so of course the single is going to hit like a ton of a bricks, anything would.

Put a single on that flows 350 kw, the same as a set of -9’s and see what happens. 🤷‍♂️

Absolutely mate I know that and totally agree. Who in their right mind would bother doing a single conversion to get max 350 kw on an RB26 ? That would be like a baby Precision 5558 or so and don't even know what that would be in EFR.

The point I was trying to make is you can pretty much have a single that roughly comes in the same time as small twins but a LOT harder, as well as being able to deliver double plus the power. The singles were in no way laggier, but delivered the power in a much more aggressive way on the road.

Cake and eat it too results I think when it comes to singles. The two white cars are both 2.6, running the same 20psi boost and spool from vac to boost was similar - but even on low boost with the 6466 the power delivery is much more savage compared to the twin hks gt-ss / -9's translating to a car that was much more of a handful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/09/2022 at 12:57 PM, BK said:

Absolutely mate I totally agree, but who in their right mind would bother doing a single conversion to get max 350 kw on an RB26 ? That would be like a baby Precision 5558, don't even know what that would be in EFR.

I guess the point I was trying to make is you can pretty much have a single that roughly comes in the same time as small twins but harder, as well as being able to deliver double plus the power.

Cake and eat it too results I think when it comes to singles.

I love this discussion, brings out some interesting and valid points.  I've never argued hard against people chosing to stay twins at 350kw as really the single benefits aren't going head and shoulders away from twins YET.  I still prefer them, but the argument is less one sided.

Now in regards to the high power vs control thing, this is really what got my attention in this discussion - we at the best of times get hard ons for showing and bragging about epic power delivery but the reality is often what matters SO MUCH with racing is making the car driveable, and reliable.   A good number of the turbo race cars I've tuned we've done a lot of work in managing the torque to keep the cars predictable, and it can seem like you're just leaving stuff on the table for no use - but honestly its amazing the difference you can make giving what people may grumble and call a "peaky" power delivery.   No point making it hit like a train if you are going to be all over the show trying to keep the car on the road.

An option you have with the likes of your 6466 that you don't with the twins is you can more or less tune the 6466 to do stuff that makes the twins good, but you can't do the other way around.   As a hypothetical thing, if you look at the dyno plot for the twins - which you know you can control the car with nicely then identify the peak torque you make with them, then select a boost curve with the 6466 that never exceeds that torque.... but ramp the boost up to carry the torque to the far end of the dyno plot, instead of letting it plummet like the twins do then you potentially have some degree of having your cake and eating it too.     Well maybe a 6466 is a bit more snappy/laggy transient wise than the EFRs/G-series that I've played with but you'll get the gist of the what I'm saying?   

I've done this kind of thing with numerous FWD/RWD/even 4WD race cars when creeping up in power levels where the owners have decided to try the suggestion as an "in between" while working up with a bigger setup and then ended up finding that it actually at least in those cases made the car easier to drive faster and is generally less hard on the car on the driver and been relatively happy leaving it there.

It may seem counter intuitive when we work so hard on finding ways to improve torque, but really in a lot of cases the "how hard is it to get to the torque I'm looking for" is a lot more important than "how much torque can I make?" when you're trying to go fast.

 

 

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I totally didn't mean to start a serious discussion, but clearly at (relatively) low power levels, standard configuration twins are perfectly adequate for competitive use.

Depending on race category rules, response can be everything. The BSM national champs winning IPRA car ran smaller than stock twins due to the intake restrictor requirements, and N1s are perfectly adequate in production car racing too.

Even in a case where the rules don't limit power, it can absolutely be better to trade off 500rpm for 100kw or more at the top end, as BK just demonstrated in the motorkhana....500rpm can take forever sometimes....

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/09/2022 at 11:10 AM, Lithium said:

managing the torque to keep the cars predictable, and it can seem like you're just leaving stuff on the table for no use - but honestly its amazing the difference you can make giving what people may grumble and call a "peaky" power delivery.   No point making it hit like a train if you are going to be all over the show trying to keep the car on the road.

^Pretty much this mate, spot on. It wasn't that the 6466 cars were laggy at all, just they delivered actually way too much mid range torque to be usable compared to a much more predictable / not over the top power delivery.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/09/2022 at 2:06 PM, BK said:

^Pretty much this mate, spot on. It wasn't that the 6466 cars were laggy at all, just they delivered actually way too much mid range torque to be usable compared to a much more predictable / not over the top power delivery.

Overall sounds like a lot of fun :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/09/2022 at 1:30 PM, Lithium said:

Overall sounds like a lot of fun :D

Yeah it was great pushing the cars. I was really impressed with the Hankook RS4 on the 32s, as it was the first time I'd used them in competition. The 33 that day was on the Advan AD08R and might be a factor on it being quicker ?

Not sure really as both gave heaps of grip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Car has done nothing since September, but I did get around to refixing the genuine front bonnet lip on properly with new mounting hardware. My under bonnet insulation pad is now annoying me and probably needs a replacement as heat is starting to affect it, but I think they are drug money price now so probably won't happen.

20221209_194323.thumb.jpg.1263cdbeabd0510546a04d0639c14b19.jpg

20221209_194355.thumb.jpg.3ce10df79be417ee4766442d02b30638.jpg

20221209_194341.thumb.jpg.ed69645e62f7dd56bbad21ad9dc218f6.jpg

20221209_194724.thumb.jpg.07cf1883603e95b16d302a8f48c7f53d.jpg

20221209_194335.thumb.jpg.4556458646125ac23657354af07758f6.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I saw all 3 cars on my way to work! Only time of the year I actually like working 🤣 Was an awesome sight. Shame my R32 broke down a month before the event :( Always keeping my eye out for the skylines. Also saw a black 33 GTST on the back of a truck heading to Barrett Drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So after some Chat GPT (yeah I know lol..) it turns out that the R35 GT-R BMC conversion may not be suitable for our shit boxes as it splits the fluid 60:40 instead of 70:30. When looking at possibly doing the 370Z conversion, it seems it's quite similar to how the R35 GT-R booster & BMC mounts up, however after some additional digging the 370Z BMC bore is the same size as a R33/34 GT-R BM57 one. Brake Pressure Split: Nissan 370Z: The typical front-to-rear brake pressure ratio for the 370Z is approximately 70:30. This is designed to handle the car’s weight distribution and performance characteristics, favoring the front brakes heavily due to weight transfer during braking. Nissan R33 GT-R: The front-to-rear brake pressure ratio for the R33 GT-R is also typically 70:30. However, this ratio is tuned for the GT-R's specific weight distribution and dynamic performance, considering its all-wheel-drive system and higher performance expectations. Despite having the same nominal 70:30 ratio, the actual distribution of braking force in practice can be different due to other factors like vehicle weight, ABS and EBD systems, and brake component sizes. Bore Sizes: The bore size of a brake master cylinder affects the hydraulic pressure generated within the braking system and can vary between different vehicles based on their braking requirements. Nissan 370Z: The brake master cylinder typically has a 1-inch (25.4 mm) primary bore. The secondary bore can vary slightly depending on specific trim levels and brake options, such as the Nismo version or those equipped with the Sport Package which features larger brakes. Nissan R33 GT-R: The brake master cylinder in the R33 GT-R generally has a 1-inch (25.4 mm) primary bore as well. Given the GT-R's high-performance context and advanced braking system, the bore size is designed to provide sufficient hydraulic pressure for its braking needs. Comparison: Brake Pressure Split: While both vehicles use a similar 70:30 ratio in the brake master cylinder design, the actual operational distribution might differ slightly due to differences in brake system components, vehicle dynamics, and tuning for each model. Bore Sizes: Both the 370Z and R33 GT-R use a master cylinder with a primary bore size of around 1 inch (25.4 mm). This similarity helps in providing robust hydraulic pressure for effective braking. Additional Considerations: Braking System Design: The overall brake system, including calipers, rotors, and the master cylinder, is designed to work as an integrated unit. Even with similar bore sizes and pressure splits, the performance and feel of the brakes can differ due to variations in brake pad composition, rotor size, and ABS tuning. ABS and EBD: Both vehicles are equipped with Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) and Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD), which further modulate and optimize braking force between the front and rear wheels dynamically, depending on driving conditions and brake demand. In essence, while the 370Z and R33 GT-R have some similarities in their brake master cylinder specifications, they are tuned to meet the specific performance and handling characteristics of each vehicle.   TL;DR, just use a R33 BM57 and call it a day.
    • Straight thru's have so little restriction that it's almost certainly not worth worrying about effects on tuning. Even a centre offset shouldn't upset things, but would be noticeably more effective (quiet).
    • I did say "2x Magnaflows" then referred to a Varex. So to un-confuse that, my rear muffler is hot-swappable with a Varex. When I had a RB Turbo, I had the 2x Magnaflows, then went LS and though "Oh that's way too loud" and ordered a Varex. A mid muffler will definitely help a lot, even if straight through. SP Mufflers can make anything as big or as small as possible, which will help even more. Looking at my own exhaust I could make the muffler twice as long if I wanted to. Or you could go crazy and get 2x mufflers from SP and full every remaining space with muffling. In my experience closing the Varex makes the car run VERY rich (obviously). I'd say adding a muffler *will* affect things, on a technical, physics level, but I don't think you'd need a retune as the actual effect would be the car running a *tiny* bit richer due to more restriction, on a strictly physics level, but you kind of don't have any option if you want the car to make less sound.
    • I must have read 100 DIY's and watched 200 DIY Youtube videos with most people saying just grab a new cover and, well, despite my normal aproach to these things (replace it all!!) I didn't get a cover. I don't know why I didn't, I'd already ordered a bunch of bits from FCP and it would have made perfect sense to put that in the order.  Anyway, I'm not getting OEM as its just crazy money, even from the states its 900 ish delivered. So, I got an OE Elring one, same as they sell at FCP but local so I can get this fixed this week. Our X5 is waiting for a new diff so we find ourselves in a common scenario of having 2 broken BMW's on the driveway! 🤣
    • Big thing is available inputs for sensors and not having to run multiple expander boxes and software packages for different things why motec is up there. The link ecu and an aim pdm32 was a combination I looked at early on so get ecu, dash and pdm in one go. Aim logging software is pretty good and has all the tracks I will ever drive. Having logging setup with tracks already available is a big thing for myself so can click drop down and go. Thing that I keep seeing is the support what's needed and having a package that people in the know are familiar with as learning a new platform is time consuming.    Got a few boxes that arrived with bits while I was away so hopefully will fit a few sensors and make a start on the dump pipe today. Going to be interesting fitting a 3.5 inch exhaust on this and keeping it above the chassis rails. 
×
×
  • Create New...