Jump to content
SAU Community

R34 jacking point


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

The lower arm pivot points are the points where the lower arms are bolted to the subframe and....pivot.

Ah ok thanks man, I'll take a look at the lower control arm and see where that point is. Hopefully don't find place it on the wrong thing haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/19/2020 at 12:14 AM, ChrisW434 said:

Sounds like you need one of these badboys to sit on your trolley jack circle... allows you to lift from the 'pinch' points

Alternatively, buy a handful of hockey pucks (used ones on eBay can be cheap). I've used them for years. For the pinch welds, you can cut a channel in them like in the pic from ChrisW434. For the diff or other jack points, you can use one without cuts to disperse the load across the saddle.

Lots of good info in this thread, btw.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Kip said:

Alternatively, buy a handful of hockey pucks (used ones on eBay can be cheap). I've used them for years. For the pinch welds, you can cut a channel in them like in the pic from ChrisW434. For the diff or other jack points, you can use one without cuts to disperse the load across the saddle.

Lots of good info in this thread, btw.

I was thinking of getting that, or at the very least jack it up by the crossmember and put jackstands there with the adapters, but apprently they can still bend (mine are already lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 12/21/2023 at 9:47 AM, silviaz said:

I was thinking of getting that, or at the very least jack it up by the crossmember and put jackstands there with the adapters, but apprently they can still bend (mine are already lol)

Just coming back to this..... What do you mean by "they can still bend"? Are you talking about the "pinch welds" at the jacking points under the sills? If so, then no. There are 2 defined jacking points on each side. These have solid metal pads to carry the load. The "pinch welds" (god I hate that term) carries NO LOAD. It's all on the designated jacking point.

Hockey pucks etc, for use on top of either chassis stands or trolley jacks, are explicitly to apply the load to those hard points and avoid the pinch weld. If they do not do that, then they are not fit for purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

Just coming back to this..... What do you mean by "they can still bend"? Are you talking about the "pinch welds" at the jacking points under the sills? If so, then no. There are 2 defined jacking points on each side. These have solid metal pads to carry the load. The "pinch welds" (god I hate that term) carries NO LOAD. It's all on the designated jacking point.

Hockey pucks etc, for use on top of either chassis stands or trolley jacks, are explicitly to apply the load to those hard points and avoid the pinch weld. If they do not do that, then they are not fit for purpose.

Yep I'm referring to the jacking point under the sill (the re-reinforced part I guess)

What I meant was, from memory I think it was @Duncan that mentioned that sometimes the jacking point under the sill can bend even if you use the adapter, but correct me if I'm wrong on this.

In the future i'll likely just hire a hoist and put the hoist arms under the jacking point sill, to avoid any potential problems.

Edited by silviaz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, silviaz said:

I think it was @Duncan that mentioned that sometimes the jacking point under the sill can bend even if you use the adapter, but correct me if I'm wrong on this.

I don't know what Duncan's experience with that problem is, but I struggle to see how you could do it unless you were clumsy. They are designed to lift and support the car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

I don't know what Duncan's experience with that problem is, but I struggle to see how you could do it unless you were clumsy. They are designed to lift and support the car.

It might have been someone else on the forum, can't remember 100% But I could have sworn that it was also mentioned on this forum that those sills aren't designed to lift and support the car and it's only for the scissor jack. I'll need to re-check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

I cannot see the difference between that, and this....

 

i see what you're saying. My line of thought was, the more you jack it up, the more force is in one area causing it to crush that area more. But now thinking about it again it might not make sense because the weight will shift depending on how the car is lifted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, silviaz said:

But now thinking about it again it might not make sense because the weight will shift depending on how the car is lifted. 

Well, that's a problem in itself. If you want to support the car on the jacking points, then you have to lift the car centrally under a subframe or diff, then prop that end with stands under the jacking points. Then you move to the other end and lift it up centrally and do the same. But you can't just ram the thing up into the air by 600mm at one end then go jack up the other, because the silly angles and the changing "grip" of the stand on the jacking point will inevitably lead to the car falling off the stands. So you have to lift a sensible amount at one end, prop it, go do the other end, and go up in bites at each end until it is high enough for what you want/need.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

Well, that's a problem in itself. If you want to support the car on the jacking points, then you have to lift the car centrally under a subframe or diff, then prop that end with stands under the jacking points. Then you move to the other end and lift it up centrally and do the same. But you can't just ram the thing up into the air by 600mm at one end then go jack up the other, because the silly angles and the changing "grip" of the stand on the jacking point will inevitably lead to the car falling off the stands. So you have to lift a sensible amount at one end, prop it, go do the other end, and go up in bites at each end until it is high enough for what you want/need.

That's what I thought if you wanted the car up high when removing the gearbox for example, so I guess 2 trolley jacks would come in handy to make it easier.

Edited by silviaz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

So long as you don't try to use them both at the same time!

Not even possible, unless you have another person but to be honest I thought doing it at the same time was the right idea because it was an even distribution haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, silviaz said:

I thought doing it at the same time was the right idea because it was an even distribution haha

Haha for real. Imagine the car pivoting around a point under the diff and a point under the front crossmember. Not a pleasant thought. You need at least 3 points on the ground at any time to be stable. A jack and 2 wheels, or a jack and 2 stands, at minimum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/2/2024 at 9:14 PM, silviaz said:

That's what I thought if you wanted the car up high when removing the gearbox for example, so I guess 2 trolley jacks would come in handy to make it easier.

I have gotten the car off the ground before on all 4 corners with only one floor jack. Jack up the front first to the lowest stop on a 2 or 3 ton jack stand set. Set it down on the stands and then jack up the rear to the same height. Repeat until you're at the top of the jack stand travel. If you need more height you can swap out the 2 ton stands for 6 ton stands or something similar halfway through. It's annoying and a lot slower than a 2 post lift or a quickjack but I don't have space for either of those.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joshuaho96 said:

I have gotten the car off the ground before on all 4 corners with only one floor jack. Jack up the front first to the lowest stop on a 2 or 3 ton jack stand set. Set it down on the stands and then jack up the rear to the same height. Repeat until you're at the top of the jack stand travel. If you need more height you can swap out the 2 ton stands for 6 ton stands or something similar halfway through. It's annoying and a lot slower than a 2 post lift or a quickjack but I don't have space for either of those.

Just sounds like a regular weekend at my place. Going to happen this week so I can replace all the sphericals in my FUCAs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/5/2024 at 11:15 AM, GTSBoy said:

Just sounds like a regular weekend at my place. Going to happen this week so I can replace all the sphericals in my FUCAs.

A potentially stupid question but if I'm using a hoist I assume for skylines it's fine to put the hoist arms (from a 2 post lift) under the jacking point sills yeah? I looked at some google images but people tend to put it on the edge of the chassis rail and put a block of wood, which is interesting, considering the sills seem to be a popular spot.

Edited by silviaz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should only use a 2 post lift under the sill jacking points if you have suitable adapters on the lift pads to touch the car ONLY only the surfaces either side of the pinchweld. Where the OEM jack would touch the car. Same as if using chassis stands there. So that would be either rubber, or preferably steel block with a slot in them.

The chassis rails are not strong enough anywhere to carry the weight of the car. If you spread it out over a really large area with a block of wood....yeah, maybe. But that's not real secure. I'd be wanting to make an adapter of some sort that fit along and up the sides of the rails at least 5-10mm, to reduce the chance of it slipping sideways, and that adapter would want to be fastened to the lifting pad well, too. I've never seen anybody go that far though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

You should only use a 2 post lift under the sill jacking points if you have suitable adapters on the lift pads to touch the car ONLY only the surfaces either side of the pinchweld. Where the OEM jack would touch the car. Same as if using chassis stands there. So that would be either rubber, or preferably steel block with a slot in them.

The chassis rails are not strong enough anywhere to carry the weight of the car. If you spread it out over a really large area with a block of wood....yeah, maybe. But that's not real secure. I'd be wanting to make an adapter of some sort that fit along and up the sides of the rails at least 5-10mm, to reduce the chance of it slipping sideways, and that adapter would want to be fastened to the lifting pad well, too. I've never seen anybody go that far though.

I've seen 2 post lifts that usually have something like this, not an adapter. Most people don't use adapters from what I've seen (non skylines I guess), would that image below be suitable in your opinion? Otherwise I might have to see an adapter that I can buy.

image.png

Something like this seems like a good option? https://classiclift.com.au/product/square-shape-rubber-pad-part201106/

Edited by silviaz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...