Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I've been recently getting back on track in the 34 and figured it was time to take the plunge and upgrade the gearbox. 

I bought the car late last year, it was originally an auto, though the previous owner (or one of) swapped the gearbox with the less-than-adequate RB20det box. This month I have been accumulating parts to convert it to the 30A transmission; bought the 34 tailshaft from the UK for pretty cheap as they're going for 100,000JPY ($900-ish) here (Japan) and this week placed an order for a new 30A from Nissan.   

The good news is, a lot of the harder to source parts I already have from the previous swap. However, I'm not 100% clear on what I can keep and what needs replacing.

I know there's some funny business involved with getting the 32 mechanical speedo to work with the 34 one, but am not clear on what modifications would have been made and how to reverse them if necessary. From what I've read, the modifications take place on the sensor side. Although, I have come across information regarding calibration of the tachometer.

Will the master cylinder / lines be reusable for the new transmission?

I've put together the following list, and it would be great if someone could point out anything I'm missing.

 

Component Part Name / Number Unit Price Shipping Total
Transmission FS5R30A 32010-AA520 ¥214,000 ¥15,000 ¥229,000
Propeller Shaft Nissan 37000AA500 ¥39,313 ¥30,000 ¥69,313
Clutch EXEDY ER34 Clutch 3-piece set 30210-AA001 30100-AA068 ¥42,350 ¥880 ¥43,230
Flywheel NA     ¥0
Spigot Bush NA     ¥0
Shifter Nissan 32839AA501/32839AB000 ¥5,387   ¥5,387
Clutch Master Cylinder ?     ¥0
Clutch Slave Cylinder Nissan 3062012U20 ¥10,753   ¥10,753
Clutch Master - Slave Lines ?     ¥0
Pedal Assembly NA     ¥0
Transmission Oil       ¥0
Clutch Fluid       ¥0
Labour   ¥100,000   ¥100,000
Resale (old parts)       ¥0
Total   ¥411,803 ¥45,880 ¥457,683
Edited by GoHashiriya
Spelling

You'll likely need a throwout bearing for the clutch, if it doesn't come with the clutch.

You'll likely need the correct transmission crossmember. The one that's under the RB20 box is probably the wrong one. They are stamped A, B and C. You can usually grab one of each from a wrecker/workshop and work out which one is needed then take the others back.

The clutch MC should work. It would be hard to believe that they put an R32 MC in there when the right thing to do in the first place would have been to put in a 34 one. Not that it should make much difference in how it works anyway.

Just get a new braided clutch line to replace the hardlines anyway. Easier and better than keeping and worrying about the old one.

The speedo is possibly a no brainer. The RB20 box has a mechanical drive via cable to a mechanical speedo head. If you have an electronic speedo head in the R34, then there's no mechanical drive. So it would be more likely that someone found an electronic sender to fit the 20 box. That's not a common thing to do, because no-one really does the conversion that you have. All the knowledge is around making a hybrid drive from a Navara to suit the big box in an R32 to drive the mech speedo. You need to work out what you have in the way of a speedo drive and head to work out what you need. If you have an electronic setup now, then all you're going to need is the appropriate speedo drive for the box. Of course, the calibration might not suit the speedo head, seeing as it originally used to work with whatever automatic speed sensor used be in there. The tacho has NOTHING to do with any of this.

You should do some searching on here for the thousands of words I have written on speedo setups for these cars.

 

  • Like 1
On 6/18/2021 at 4:58 PM, GTSBoy said:

You'll likely need a throwout bearing for the clutch, if it doesn't come with the clutch.

You'll likely need the correct transmission crossmember. The one that's under the RB20 box is probably the wrong one. They are stamped A, B and C. You can usually grab one of each from a wrecker/workshop and work out which one is needed then take the others back.

The clutch MC should work. It would be hard to believe that they put an R32 MC in there when the right thing to do in the first place would have been to put in a 34 one. Not that it should make much difference in how it works anyway.

Just get a new braided clutch line to replace the hardlines anyway. Easier and better than keeping and worrying about the old one.

The speedo is possibly a no brainer. The RB20 box has a mechanical drive via cable to a mechanical speedo head. If you have an electronic speedo head in the R34, then there's no mechanical drive.

 

Appreciate this alot! 

From what I can see the R34 AT/MT crossmember is the same - going by part numbers. I did find some information amidst the leagues of info on this site that said the RB20 box will fit the AT R34 crossmember (potentially was an R33) but you would only be able to utilise two bolts to mount it. I'll double check this. Thanks for advising on the crossmember identifiers.

I'll expect to do some dismantling of the speedo sensor and a bit more digging when we do the swap.   

  • 2 months later...

Hi all, the box is going in on Monday,

Can anyone confirm whether Nissan fill the gearboxes with oil when ordered from the factory? 

I've ordered some 75W90 castrol for the after break-in change but potentially will need to use it before the transmission goes in.

On 25/08/2021 at 5:42 PM, GoHashiriya said:

Hi all, the box is going in on Monday,

Can anyone confirm whether Nissan fill the gearboxes with oil when ordered from the factory? 

I've ordered some 75W90 castrol for the after break-in change but potentially will need to use it before the transmission goes in.

Which Castrol exactly ? The Synthetic Syntrax 75w90 I presume ?

If so, from my experience I would not be using it as it's doesn't seem to play nicely with the synchros at high rpm. I mean you could use it as a break in / flush oil, but as a GL-5 diff oil it just doesn't shift properly at high rpm, which seems to be a common theme with GL-5 only oils.

In synchro GTR transmissions I myself have generally used Castrol, and found the most suitable to be the 75w-85 GL-4 oils as per original Nissan specification.

Castrol VMX-M 75w-85 or VMX 80w for a mineral or Castrol Syntrans 75w-85 for a synthetic is recommended, both are GL-4 spec.

  • Like 1
On 8/25/2021 at 7:35 PM, BK said:

Which Castrol exactly ? The Synthetic Syntrax 75w90 I presume ?

If so, from my experience I would not be using it as it's doesn't seem to play nicely with the synchros at high rpm. I mean you could use it as a break in / flush oil, but as a GL-5 diff oil it just doesn't shift properly at high rpm, which seems to be a common theme with GL-5 only oils.

In synchro GTR transmissions I myself have generally used Castrol, and found the most suitable to be the 75w-85 GL-4 oils as per original Nissan specification.

Castrol VMX-M 75w-85 or VMX 80w for a mineral or Castrol Syntrans 75w-85 for a synthetic is recommended, both are GL-4 spec.

Actually it was a little difficult being in Japan as the products aren’t identical. I ended up with Castrol syntrans 75w90, whilst I was looking for syntrax. The description (translated) reads as this: 

“Castrol SYNTRANS Transaxle 75W-90 API GL-4 + Thin Trans Gear Oil Mission Oil All Synthetic Oil FF Car Transaxle Combined” 

On the can it says transaxle, manual transmission and FF.

Cheers for your input - being unable to shift properly at high RPM would be pretty inconvenient, so If it is incorrect, I’ll just use it as break-in oil.

DA19F169-BAEB-4BB6-A418-8016060C8A56.jpeg

Edited by GoHashiriya

Aha ! Yes this is not sold in Australia anymore but used to be under the old grey bottles as TAF-X, as noted on the top of your bottle. Haven't seen this in over 10 years here, it's a good oil.

Should be no worries as its basically a 75w-90 GL-4+, which is the closest equivalent to our 75w-85 Syntrans GL-4.

It will be absolutely fine 👍

I usually break in / flush with the VMX-M and then switch to syntrans.

I guess Castrol Australia saw no point importing a synthetic GL-4 in 75w-85 and 75w-90 weights as the difference will be negligible.

Here's the spec sheet on your oil:

BPXE-9ZWGML.pdf

  • Like 1
On 8/26/2021 at 9:29 AM, BK said:

Aha ! Yes this is not sold in Australia anymore but used to be under the old grey bottles as TAF-X, as noted on the top of your bottle. Haven't seen this in over 10 years here, it's a good oil.

Should be no worries as its basically a 75w-90 GL-4+, which is the closest equivalent to our 75w-85 Syntrans GL-4.

It will be absolutely fine 👍

I usually break in / flush with the VMX-M and then switch to syntrans.

I guess Castrol Australia saw no point importing a synthetic GL-4 in 75w-85 and 75w-90 weights as the difference will be negligible.

Here's the spec sheet on your oil:

BPXE-9ZWGML.pdf 34.16 kB · 1 download

I appreciate this a lot. Thanks for confirming!

I’d been using the U.K. castrol site (as I’m a U.K. citizen) for comparison but couldn’t  match anything up. 

I’m unable to find the VMX on a quick search but will check if there is a comparable over here for run in. At $100 (US) for the TAF-X it seems a bit wasteful to bin it after 1,000km. Ah well, we’ll see. 

Yeah I know -the Castrol vmx-m 75w-85 mineral is about $50au for 4 litres vs the $40 - $50au a litre for Syntrans.

Just look in Castrol where you are for a GL-4 mineral around 80w for a suitable first run oil, as I'm sure there will be something equivalent.

  • Like 1
On 8/26/2021 at 1:46 PM, BK said:

Yeah I know -the Castrol vmx-m 75w-85 mineral is about $50au for 4 litres vs the $40 - $50au a litre for Syntrans.

Just look in Castrol where you are for a GL-4 mineral around 80w for a suitable first run oil, as I'm sure there will be something equivalent.

Thanks again. As per the Castrol  JP site we have: 

TRANSMAX MANUAL 80W-90 ($9 US p/l)

  • API GL-4, GL-5
  • SAE 80W-90 
  • Partially synthetic oil

- TRANSMAX MANUAL 75W-90 ($15 US p/l)

  • API GL-3, GL-4
  • SAE 75W-90 *
  • Partially synthetic oil

The first one seems applicable to the run-in case and at less than half the price seems more suitable, financially. 

 

Edited by GoHashiriya
  • 2 weeks later...

Just to clarify for anyone searching: the new transmisssion came part-filled with oil from Nissan. We added about a litre of Castrol TAF-X before it started leaking from the fill hole. Shifting is fine - a tad notchy to begin with as expected but I've been shifting slow during break-in anyhow. I will be changing the oil in arround another 500kms, likely this month.  

As GTSBoy mentioned, crossmember was different - it was the B-type under the RB20 box. Luckily was able to order another from Nissan quickly. 

Edited by GoHashiriya

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...