Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had the double, it was great. I never regretted choosing it over the single tbh.

You'd hate to not have enough, have to install a clutch twice if you're over 300kw.

Buy once, cry once etc.

  • Like 1

I agree with go for the twin if you are worried about power, for the extra cost it holds a lot more.

You lose no drive-ability, nor does it get loud.

 

So only downside is the wallet. 

 

Unless you have one already, then carry on ...

  • Like 1

380kwatw in my old 33 GTST with the nismo coppermix

Held fine

The gearbox on the other hand, well, it was fine for cruising around, but with sticky tyres they didn't last long if you were actually using the power

Start budgeting for a better transmission if you plan on "using" the power

On 1/14/2022 at 3:11 AM, mlr said:

380kwatw in my old 33 GTST with the nismo coppermix

Held fine

The gearbox on the other hand, well, it was fine for cruising around, but with sticky tyres they didn't last long if you were actually using the power

Start budgeting for a better transmission if you plan on "using" the power

Thanks,

was that the single or twin?

 

Thanks for the feedback ..

 My car makes about 320kw at the engine .. and at the moment I have a OSG Twin installed.

Now after 13,000km it started slipping in 4th/5th. I think the stop and go traffic killed it since the plates are worn.

In an EMail OSG said the clutch is more geared towards harsh engagement and would wear used 'normal'

The OSG refresh kit would cost me around GBP 450 plus (taxes, postages etc)

The Nismo Single GBP 710, the Nismo Twin GBP 1,140 (all plus)

 

That's why I was thinking just getting the single to get a bit more life out of the clutch.

I also never liked the rattle of the OSG twin.

On the other hand just buying the refresh kit would be the cheapest option.

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...