Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Lithium said:

 

Just to remind you the key requirement of the thread:

 
I am building a Street Car (Not a Race car) and will be using mostly RON98 But will be E85 compatible. I want Response more than Top End. 

everyone else seemed to digress from the conversation, and that's fine.

Ok Lithium I know you have beef with me and take every single opportunity to attack me, that's fine. On the block list you go.

21 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

If it doesn't have a Ti-al wheel then everything else can be ignored.

Yes, more manufacturers should use better materials. It makes so much of a difference in the real world that I just cry when people spend money on turbos without doing proper research. The only other variable is packaging, but if you physically can't fit a huge turbo somewhere, you are well outside of the "Street car" category.

These lighter materials have their limits and with how hard a lot of people are pushing turbos these days the ti-al wheel would be lucky to last the dyno session on some of these cars. Everything is horses for corses 

the best answer so far has been from @Piggaz which was “what’s your power goal?” 

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

everyone else seemed to digress from the conversation, and that's fine.

Ok Lithium I know you have beef with me and take every single opportunity to attack me, that's fine. On the block list you go.

Lol I actually am here nor there about you tbh, if anything my understanding is you have a huge issue with me for some reason and that'd be the main reason I'd be less cordial with you. 

 

That aside I'm not sure why you're taking it personally when I simply responded to you after you quoted me - I *always* try my best to keep in mind what OP is looking for even if it doesn't align with my personal tastes, so my response would have been more or less the same regardless of who said it. And I'd also not have had a cry if someone said the exact same thing to me as it seems perfectly reasonable.  

  • Like 1
23 hours ago, r32-25t said:

These lighter materials have their limits and with how hard a lot of people are pushing turbos these days the ti-al wheel would be lucky to last the dyno session on some of these cars. Everything is horses for corses 

the best answer so far has been from @Piggaz which was “what’s your power goal?” 

Use a bigger turbo. Spin it less hard. People overdriving turbos does not make it a good turbo selection, nor a good plan.

I can run 200psi boost too and make tons of power, is that what we should recommend then 😛

  • Like 1
7 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

Use a bigger turbo. Spin it less hard. People overdriving turbos does not make it a good turbo selection, nor a good plan.

I can run 200psi boost too and make tons of power, is that what we should recommend then 😛

Why not? if the turbo can do it, go for it 

22 minutes ago, r32-25t said:

Why not? if the turbo can do it, go for it 

Strictly speaking it can't, or shouldn't be.   The assumption is that most sensible people keep things within parameters, we expect tuners to not keep advancing timing past the point knock starts happening even if there are gains to be had because you obviously start making things degrade a LOT faster.   We let engines warm up properly before thrashing them.   We run appropriate oil and change it before it loses it's usefulness.   We don't overspeed turbos.    

You also massively overstate the fragility of EFRs.   It is farrrrr from a case of "pass the max compressor speed limit and they explode" like some people try to paint the situation as being. 

The thing I *do* strongly agree with what you said, and have been sorta expecting to get clarified at some point - the actual power goals and therefore the match required is a pretty critical thing that needs to enter this convo before it really gets too much further.   

I threw the EFR8474 down there as the OP mentioned response and it is kinda a "cake and eat it too" option when discussing something like an RB28 for happy street use.   It'll be a nice super responsive turbo on an RB28 if you "only" want 400kw, but will also go past 600kw @ hubs on E85 while still being well safe from running the risk of grenading if you wanted to go there.   The response and flow is good enough that if you want anywhere from 400-600kw then it will do so without any excessive lag or strain, so you're unlikely to end up with regrets going for one.

If you aren't building a roll-race or drag car then it'd be pretty hard to make a case for another turbo unless it's a fitment or budget concern driving the decision making - but that is still making some assumptions on what OP wants.  Be nice to have clarification.

Edited by Lithium

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...