Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been building a 26/30 for a few years now. I've had the head built with all the good stuff. I had a 32 gtr but blew it up and yes its all going into a vl but im looking for some advice from some RB nuts on pros and cons on putting a 26 head on a 30 bottom end is it worth it

Works are as follows

Head

-Extensive porting

1mm oversized supertech valves

Supertech double springs

Supertech valve guides

Supertech titanium retainers

Tomei solid lifters

Tomei 270 x 10.25 cams

Head drain

Bottom end series 2 rb30 block

Cp ceramic coated pistons

Eagle rods

Romac balancer

Oil restrictions 

O ringed blah blah spent a fortune

And will get a girdle because the 30s arent used to handling that much rpm

Nitto billet oil pump

Hypertune plenum

6boost mani

Refurbed astra pump thats the cover for it in the boot

I did have a precision 6262 but sold it because drag car life.

Currently building the ass end full 4 link floater rear end with a 2 speed 

But the dilemma i have is my mate rekens I should just stick with the 30 head for reliability. Has any one had any issues with mounting the 26 head ie compression blowing gaskets etc. Just looking for some advice from people who have gone down this route.

Here's some photos. Blew the oil pump in the gtr and decided to rip the motor out at the time and do a full build only to find it had been a repairable write off so went down this path. 

 

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486253-rb2630-build/
Share on other sites

2630s work perfectly well.

There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big.

It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486253-rb2630-build/#findComment-8000397
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them. 

Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too. 

 

The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look. 

Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done. 


RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.

Edited by Butters
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486253-rb2630-build/#findComment-8000398
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, MBS206 said:

And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.

No doubt barra is a great cheap way to make power but... so many around now I just call them cabs lol. And low revving compared to the rb doesnt sound anywhere near as cool haha. And talk about sacrilege, i love the rbs jist something about them 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486253-rb2630-build/#findComment-8000416
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, r32-25t said:

You’ll want to have the block drilled and tapped to suit 1/2in head studs and the head for the same.

How much power do you intend to make?

Years ago I wanted allllll the power but realistically 700hp would be more than enough for what I want. I started the build with the intention of dragging it. But times change family etc I just want a mad streeter than I can take to powercruise.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486253-rb2630-build/#findComment-8000417
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

2630s work perfectly well.

There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big.

It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.

Been looking at PRP and how much work and development they've put into making it easier to put the 26 head on. They even make this bracket to tap the idler pulley on, its so awesome how far that stuff has come in the last 10 years.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486253-rb2630-build/#findComment-8000418
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lilley's gtr said:

If anyone has done a similar build I'd love to see what they did and why 

To help you out... If you head for the "Forced Induction" section of the forum, you'll find these two threads.

RB30 Hybrid Dyno Results.

RB30 Conversion Thread

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486253-rb2630-build/#findComment-8000429
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...