Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

came across a nice japanese site late last night with some very nice HR31 to look at... http://cwaweb.bai.ne.jp/~kgc10/. Have some good links to other japanese HR31 sites.

For those that can't be bothered clicking, here are some nice pics to get you going..

sorry if its welcome to yesterday for some :flamed:

rr311.jpeg

rr312.jpeg

maejima3.jpeg

aka31.jpg

DSCF0030.jpeg

DSCF0034.jpeg

itou1.jpeg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50882-some-nicehr31/
Share on other sites

I've got rims I can reverse to get a silly amount of dish like that, and I think i can do it legally because my car is exempt from ADR's, but to fit wheels with that much negative offset I'd need to chop off part of my guards under a set of fibreglass flares wouldnt I?

How/why is ur car exepmt from ADR's Adam???

Some tough R31's in that lot, pity bout the SR under the bonnet of one of them though :throwup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50882-some-nicehr31/#findComment-1010392
Share on other sites

i've always had a thing for the red one at the top..

and the only way a car can be exempt from ADR's is when its unregistered and does not touch any road....

just sold my deep dish watanabes to a mate with a r31 they look pretty sweet, at least the sr20 powered one carries the name "R31house" you have to take that into consideration....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50882-some-nicehr31/#findComment-1010996
Share on other sites

I've got a letter stating that my car is exempt from ADR's :cheers: (apart from seat belts and a few other minor things)

It has to adhere to the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Regulations.

Road Traffic Act says only that a car must be 'safe' which comes down to no obvious mechanical defects (ie broken shit) and that it must adhere to the Road Traffic Regulations.

Road Traffic Regulations say minimum 100mm clearance, under 90db, 1.5mm tyre tread, and that ADR's must be adhered to. BUT it also says that if a vehicle is exempt ADR's under any other statute that is applicable in this jurisdiction (which my car is) then they are exempt from that section.

Ie I'm soooo keeping this car now :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50882-some-nicehr31/#findComment-1011114
Share on other sites

They don't here :D

They shouldnt have given a law student that letter hehe

I wouldnt want bigger diameter rims anyway, 16 is as big as I will ever need

I've got that lettter as well Adam, it doesn't mena SHIT my friend!! The only thing going for us, is that they don't have the spec's on the cars (last time i got pulled over that was nearly 2 years ago though so who knows)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50882-some-nicehr31/#findComment-1012022
Share on other sites

I reckon it does if you know what you're talking about when you get pulled. All that they can do is say "It doesnt look safe". This is at their discretion but I think it would be easier to get a defect cleared and unless they can come up with something good, I'm going to keep looking for 9 or 10 inch wide rims

I'm going to get some bigass Flinders Law Students Society stickers made up and I'll keep some text books in the back and I'm not going to get done over for having a pod or a big exhaust (unless its over 90db..... meh I'm going to get the exhaust redone and lose the fart can anyway) or anything

Touch wood

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50882-some-nicehr31/#findComment-1012453
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know if you can disassemble the thing and put it backwards for different ramp rates. They're both "2 ways" or both "1.5 ways" because well, 2 ways and 1.5 ways are the same 'thing' I do not know for sure, but I believe the 38420-RSS15-B5 is the 1 way, and 38420-RSS20-B5 is the two way. In other words, I predict Nissan considers this: to be a 1.5 way. No idea what actually happens when it arrives/you disassemble it. It would be an excellent question to ask Nismo directly! I somehow doubt you will get an answer though, I feel you would be the first person to document what you encounter when you open the box and the internet would be grateful.
    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...