Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I don't know what you mean i thought they played pretty good after like the first 3/4 of the match we had like 15 on target shots to Japan's 5... in saying that i may be a bit biased as me and the four other guys i am with were at the Brandenberg Gate in Berlin watching it on the big screen with like 150 other Aussies... all i can say is it went OFFFFFFFFFFF beer being thrown everwhere alot of jumping and alot of high 5's :D probably the highlight of the trip so far

WOOT GO AUSTRALIA will be there again tonight hoping Brazil beat Croation 4 - 0

Leigh

Come on Aussie, Come on, Come on! Come on Aussie come on!

Did anyone else suffer a few heart attacks lastnight watching the Australia vs Japan match?

Was a good comeback but if we play that way against brazil we're gonna get thrashed.

I don't know what you mean i thought they played pretty good after like the first 3/4 of the match we had like 15 on target shots to Japan's 5... in saying that i may be a bit biased as me and the four other guys i am with were at the Brandenberg Gate in Berlin watching it on the big screen with like 150 other Aussies... all i can say is it went OFFFFFFFFFFF beer being thrown everwhere alot of jumping and alot of high 5's :D probably the highlight of the trip so far

WOOT GO AUSTRALIA will be there again tonight hoping Brazil beat Croation 4 - 0

Leigh

Theres no doubt Japan had a shit game, i remember watching them a while ago and they were fast as. I think they got themselves in the "protect the house" frame of mind when they got the first goal, and all they needed to do was defend it. It was obvious because of the lack of offence.

But still, Australia needs to improve if they wanna make a dent in brazil. Viduka needs to do more with the ball then having his back to the goal and having to pass it off.

The next world cup teams gonna be a goal fest - kaz patafta (who's currently the youth world cup captain) should be in the top squad. That kid has skill, he's 17 and he's already signed overseas. I used to play in the same team when we were young lads. He's a canberra boy so its gonna be awesome to see what happens in the future..... You think kewel is good, wait for Patafta :D

  • 1 month later...

Gus, seen your sig -

Any chance of getting the infamous fall down clip by the Italian in your sig next to the payback dished out by our mate ZiZu.

He did it for different reasons but like to think it's Karma. Should have been on the bridge of his nose.

Yeap,

I have some. Got them second hand off this forum. They are Thule (spelling?) ones and can easily be removed. You can get attachments for bikes and storage racks etc as well. Dont know about the price, I got mine for $200...

Edited by GunMetalR33

i will borrow them off ya snooze when i go to the snow if you get some :P

Also i found this when looking for a bike i thought it was a funny reading the reason why he is selling the bike :(

http://www.bikesales.com.au/as/search/sd.d...tPage=2&x=2

Gus, seen your sig -

Any chance of getting the infamous fall down clip by the Italian in your sig next to the payback dished out by our mate ZiZu.

He did it for different reasons but like to think it's Karma. Should have been on the bridge of his nose.

i duno where to find the one of him taking the dive against australia

but i did find this awesome site, take a squiz

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/13/zi...adbutt_outrage/

ok I messaged Thule roof racks, they say they have nothing at all to suit an R33, i ring roof rack would in Mitchel, 20min conversation he comes up with some one that should fit. $360. I am kind of like well my 7' surfboard will be twice as long at the roof, this is not going to work i dont think.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...