Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Over the weekend I have installed a set of King Springs (Super Low) on my 33.

I am very happy with the improved driving stability although the front end has not lowered much at all (barely an inch)

I particularly like the look of a low car and was wondering what you guys have done to get the front guard sitting extremely close to the top of the tyre. I am fairly hapy with the back...

Has any1 cut a coil on the front? If so, can you advise pros/cons. Or is there anything else I can do....

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5625-kings-springs-ride-height/
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Spada33

Over the weekend I have installed a set of King Springs (Super Low) on my 33.

I am very happy with the improved driving stability although the front end has not lowered much at all (barely an inch)

I particularly like the look of a low car and was wondering what you guys have done to get the front guard sitting extremely close to the top of the tyre. I am fairly hapy with the back...

Has any1 cut a coil on the front? If so, can you advise pros/cons. Or is there anything else I can do....

Cheers

Too low and it will farquar the handling and upset the HICAS.

Give the springs some time to settle as well, go over some speed humps a few times to accelerate it.

The gap between the fropnt guard and tyre is about 2 inches (doubt whether it will settle that much??).....

I have a SII so the bumper is fairly low at the front and isn't anywhere near scraping, so I assume there should b a bit of give b4 it starts riding like a pig..... any thoughts??

I just fitted 'low' as opposed to 'super lows'

(Lows are 1 inch lowered and super lows are 1.5)

My front also didnt seem to lower as much as the rear.

Whiteline state that lowering a 33 any more than 1inch will actually start to affect the cars handling in a negative way, which is why i only went the 'lows'. Apparently once you go past an inch, you will no longer have 100% suspension travel or something. (this doesnt include adjustable coilovers, as they can go quite low and still have the correct travel)

So i gather this will be noticed only when cornering near the limit.

ive enclosed an extract of the article. (The whole article is on whitelines site. www.whiteline.com.au)

"The whiteline car... uses springs lowered around 25mm (1inch) If you expect good handling, thats all it can handle."

Anyone who is even near being professional, will tell you DONT cut a coil off your springs!

Leave that for the backyarders (or commodore owners? -hey, they all seem to go chop their springs, especially the rear ones :P)

I cant remember the exact reason, something about spring rate??

I think its okay to have them RESET to your desired height though. This is also very cheap, and you still keep all your coils.

:)

you dont a coil off a spring because they were designed to operate as a whole spring. cutting a coil off changes its properties completely beit spring rate, load capacity and even ability to sit on top of the shockie. i wouldnt recommend cutting springs under any situation, especially not for a skyline, theyre a classy car dammit! :P

Originally posted by SLY33

I just fitted 'low' as opposed to 'super lows'

(Lows are 1 inch lowered and super lows are 1.5)

My front also didnt seem to lower as much as the rear.

Same here Allan. I've got Kings 'low' & the front sits slightly higher than the rear. I see this as a good thing! More clearance for the front bar.

Even a 1" drop (rear) is enough to require a camber kit if you want decent wear rates & grip off the line/straight line acceleration.

You only have the LOWS matt! I thought yours looked lower than an inch for sure!

The point that often comes up (with any car) about the front being higher than the rear, is a bit misleading.

This makes a lot of people think that the car is not level, as the tyre-to-guard clearance is different from front-to-rear. This is not the case however (or shouldnt be if you purchased springs lowered the same amount!)

Not many cars are designed to have front and rear guards at exactly the same height. It is the "sill" height that needs to be level, and if you lower a car more at the front in order to get the guard closer to the tyre, you will get a "raked" look -your nose will be angled toward the ground. And while this can look tough on some cars, its not good for handling.

Take most older commodores as an example, where most models have a very low rear guard, which makes the rear look majorly low when lowered, but the front tyres will never go that far up into the guards.

I got King super lows (i think) on 18" rims on my R32. As far as ride goes these are better then my previous standard height GABs. On hard turns and bumps there is a bit of scrubbing problem (boxhead witnessed this on Mad Mountain). But in gerneral driving around town they couldn't be any better.

attachment.php?s=&postid=84511

Ever thought that the old spring / shocker was worn out and could not properly support the weight of the car. So it was lower than factory to begin with. That's why it doesn't appear to have lowered too far.

Anyway, its been recommended many times in the past not to lower Skylines more than about 1" - 1.5", otherwise it totally stuffs the steering geometry.

There is only one problem with cutting springs, and that is how you cut them.

If you just chop the end off with an angle grinder, the high temperature destroys the heat treatment in the end of the spring.

However if you take it very gently, dipping the hot end into a bucket of water every few seconds, there will be no problem.

I have done this myself many times with good results. A shorter spring will also have less active coils and will therefore be slightly stiffer as well. The stresses in the coil wire remain the same so the spring will not be overloaded.

Take your time, and only cut off a small section at a time maybe 30mm. Refit it to the car and see how much it has been lowered. It takes ages to do, but costs nothing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
    • I assume clearances were all a-okay?
×
×
  • Create New...