Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Just saw a performance video recently (think named something like performane series 6) and on the last footage it mentioned Sub Zero got a GTST that can do 10s and it cost $15000 for such a setup. The video didnt go into any great detail so just wondering if anyone knows any info on it considering GTRs needs to spend twice the amount to get the same figures.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/
Share on other sites

Yep, actually there are two. One is 40RCD, which was a 2.5 litre single turbo, and I can't remember the plates on the other car, but it was/is 3.0 litre and twin turbo. The twin turbo one made more power on less boost but I believe it's yet to better 40RCD's time.

40RCD was owned by a guy named Dave Chapman. At the time the car ran a best of 10.69@126mph iirc. I believe the box was a rebuilt Trimatic, same as they use in the 9 sec VL Turbos. It did NOT have a 3 litre bottom end and twin turbos, it was a rebuilt/balanced RB25DET bottom end with forgies, still had RB25 head etc too.

The car was sold and now has TRY09 plates. I think it's run something like a 10.04 ???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/#findComment-96742
Share on other sites

it is an awesomely tough car with (at the time serious perf 6 was made) very little (internal) engine work. the auto box is part of this cars magic...

very worthwhile... does awesome burnouts and power drifting and in the dvd versions bonus thingo's. almost takes out the director on a corner that he over cooks..

:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/#findComment-98803
Share on other sites

Guest MFX_R33

Mac 30. It does cost alot more to get a GTR to do those sort of times, but remember most of those GTR's were running street tyres and pump fuel. It is common knowledge that it is easier to get a rear wheel drive to do quick times on the track than 4 wheel. RWD cars with slicks don't have the trouble with traction that they do on the street so 4WD becomes a hinderence, adding weight and taking power.

Jeff.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/#findComment-99133
Share on other sites

MFX_R33, the 4WD system of the GTR doesn't kick in until the rear loses traction, so the only disadvantage it should have is the extra weight.

yeah, and this happens about 2/100ths of a sec after the loud pedal is pressed and the clutch let out. Don't think for a second that the stock 4WD setup keeps it in RWD for anything like a whole run.

:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/#findComment-99188
Share on other sites

2rismo,

do you know what sort of internal work had been done, and how reliable it was - just wondering as I have heard so many conflicts on what the stock internals can handle (most seem to point to the pistons in the first intance as the weak link). The main thing I am interested in is proven reliable horsepower

Thanks for any help

Steve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/#findComment-99371
Share on other sites

I was @ Willowbank on the 23rd (Sat' T&T session) & watched TYR09 run a 9.9 @ 144mph.

The amazing thing about this car is it ran the 9.9 @ 144 with the back end all over the track for @ least a 1/3 of it :eek: If it can hook up it'll go much quicker!

Edit - The engine in TRY09 is far from the stock RB25DET! It's a seriously modified RB26DETT (RB30 bottom end perhaps?) & it uses N2O.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/#findComment-99468
Share on other sites

144mph, really?? That's pretty impressive, a RWD car with that kind of terminal speed should be good for mid-low nines. Good luck to the guys.

On another note, did anyone see the LJ (or LC?) torana with the twin turbo 427 Chev? Not a Skyline I know, but I liked it a lot :) Ran 7.8 something @ 177mph, and I notice it had number plates! Orright, imagine rocking up beside someone at the lights with that thing ... traction issues aside :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/#findComment-102824
Share on other sites

yes try09 runs a rb26 with twins xtr turbos and has a built rb38 bottom end and it was also confiscated last saturday night, doing the normal stuff , he was just at the wrong place at the wrong time and doing the wrong speed, hell everyone else just hit the loud peddal, 20 or so cars at WOT what a scene

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/#findComment-102827
Share on other sites

I was talking to a few of the guys that were there @ WB with TRY09, they mentioned heading out after the meet to do the "normal stuff". Was it still running the slicks on the street? How long is it gone for?

Yep Craig Thompson's Orange TTV8 Torrie ran a best (first pass of the night!) of 7.88 @ 177mph! This thing is a beast :eek: 2 x TA45 Garrett's (I think?) I'd like to see it hit the street in the trim it ran @ WB though (not likely!). Did anyone see it get waaaaay out of shape on the 2nd pass burnout!? Nearly lost it!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/#findComment-102857
Share on other sites

Hey guys i just thought i'd clear a few things up about the engine from the rb 30 bottom end we have a custom peterson dry sump which has been the best investment so far it got a standard crank, argo rods with arp rod bolts, wiesco pistons, the head is a rb 26 which has been ported & polished with a arp stud kit, it has hks step 2 cams with toda cam gears, a subzero exhaust manafold, the turbo is a TA45 from XTR (gcg turbos) a subzero wastegate, a subzero intercooler, a teil bov (same 1 used by indy cars), a subzero inlet plenium with a 100mm throdle body, 6 1000cc rochester injectors on a subzero fuel rail & 2 850 bosch fuel pumps & 1 650 for the NOS, a subzero billet flywheel (i nearly blew in my pants when i seen it what can't ivan make) a 2 speed powerglide with a tce 4500 stall converter & transbrake, the diff is a 200sx nismo locker diff the gears 4.1s.At the track we use a wet NOS system with 100hp pill 1 bar of boost & c16 fuel our best time to date is a 9.81 at 142mph with fresh m/t 8.5in slicks but they have gone into retirement now to make way for the 10in slicks & where going to try solid bars instead of suspension in the rear end & if everything goes to plan we will wick the boost up to 2bar & should run a mid to low 9sec pass, i will keep everyone posted.

p.s. got the car back in 1 piece thankcargod

BRETT.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6398-10-sec-gtst/#findComment-103576
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...