Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Exhaust filter this has been proved from 2 users called Merli and kabab in the year 1800 before everyone in the universe had a Skyline.

RIP the good old days.

:(

The result was 14.0 sec v 14.1 sec, advantage R32. Mods were like, exhaust/filter. Correct me if I'm wrong either of you.

I've got my money on the R32 (go the 20), until you get past that stage.... then cubes > 20

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1203938
Share on other sites

I've recently got my R32 (stock as a rock at the moment), and it feels slower than any R33 I have ever been in. Not that I've been in too many "totally" stock R33 though.

My Passage has a silvertop RB20DET and RB20 box and pulls pretty nicely though.. only real difference seems to the 3" exhaust, pod and 10psi..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1203943
Share on other sites

I've recently got my R32 (stock as a rock at the moment), and it feels slower than any R33 I have ever been in. Not that I've been in too many "totally" stock R33 though.  

My Passage has a silvertop RB20DET and RB20 box and pulls pretty nicely though.. only real difference seems to the 3" exhaust, pod and 10psi..

And you also have an 89 model. A 92-93 type m would be a fair bit better/faster i imagine. i know the ecu is different at the least...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1204505
Share on other sites

i got my R33(totally stock cept for the body) like 2 weeks ago and i already want to change it for an R32.

Not because the R33 is slow. in fact, i quite enjoy driving it, but i just love the R32 shape.

yeh the r33 is the only boat that you cant fit you fishing rods in :wassup: :wassup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1204546
Share on other sites

R33 is faster by far. As someone who has owned a pretty good example of a R32 GTS-T as good a car as it is the RB25DET IMHO is the better engine.

Mod to mod the little RB20DET can't compete. There is a weight difference but the engine more than makes up for it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1204552
Share on other sites

Stock for Stock hmmm lets see.

I have a few friends with skylines, some have r32s some r33s some sedans some coupes.

Now we have had lots of races between them all. and these are the results. (keeping in mind the results were done when all the cars were completely stock appart from my car which the engine was stock but was converted to manual - r33 sedan).

These were measured on a airstrip so it was 0-180kmph. All the cars that were involved were manuals.

r32 coupe vs r33 coupe = r33 coupe was quicker

r32 sedan vs r33 sedan = r33 sedan was quicker

r32 coupe vs r33 sedan = Photo finish - very very close

r32 sedan vs r33 coupe = r33 coupe was quicker by far

anyone can dispute any of these results but these are just what we found out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/64176-r32-vs-r33-gtsts/#findComment-1204598
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...