Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've asked about it from a few tuners and all have reported to just leave it and dont change it

Ive connected a Wideband A/F guage and if i give it medium throttle, it richens up to say high 11's and then goes to mid to high 12's once your on the throttle and the accelearting enrichment has gone. This is only on medium throttle with very little boost. I played with it and now im in the 12's and ive noticed an improvement in throttle response. '

I'll do some more testing and leet you know how i go.

  • 2 weeks later...

expanded on bad idle problems (how to correctbad idle / cranking / starting problem)

added evo8 support (harness part #)

added eccs wiring howto (bugfix to correct memory save problem)

added dialing in larger injectors

added authors notes

Has anyone tried playing with the Accelerating Enrichment program on the Power FC?

Here's some info I posted elsewhere in a Datalogit context.

The "Inj vs Accel TPS1" area of the 'settings 2' tab affects the

linearity of the Accelerate Injector settings. You don't want 100%

of 'accelerator pump' settings to kick in when you just apply, say,

a 25% change in throttle position. Nor do you necessarily want 25%

of the extra fuel. The 'input' field is throttle position in units

out of 256. (128 = 50% throttle) The 'setting' field is the fraction

of Accelerate Injector setting out of 256 that will be applied give

the partial throttle increase. There are three 'linearity'

adjustment points, but be aware that there are two more fixed ones.

(0,0 and 256,256)

I've found that I need to set the first 'Input' box to a pretty low

TP number (5/256) and give it a fair shot of fuel (175/256) to avoid

leaning out under modest throttle increases. The PFC linearly

interpolates between these points, so for throttle positions between

the linearity adjustment points, you'll get a smooth transition.

Hope this helps,

Dan

corrected powerfc dongle information

added INJ guesstimation for lambda

added airflow precentage correction map scaling

added updated datalogit version

added missing eccs image

hey i just went through and wrote every single bit of inforamtion down from my pfc, the ign and inj maps and other thibngs like the water temp screens etc etc..... took me a bit, am i right to reset the pfc and reload those valuse what do i need to be careful of (its just when they tuner put my pfc in he didnt do the idle learn thing with the a/c etc so my idle hunts)

  • 3 weeks later...

added repairing powerfc notes

expanded on airtemp support

added knocking explantion with likely causes

added advanced knock debug

added datalogit AFR plot

added rb20 vs rb25 pinouts

added r33 sensor SW check page

added R32 sensor SW Check page

expaned on hybrid version support

- differences between RB20 and RB25 looms

- support matrix for features

There's an error in the FAQ. The R33 BCK is 3 pin for the MAP sensor harness to PFC, and the solenoid harness plugs straight into the harness for the oem solenoid.

You can control boost using the oem solenoid with the BCK MAP sensor (I tried this) but the control is awful, as you'd expect from a 2 port solenoid.

Hey guys,

Great thread!

I have a question.

On the old Nissan ECU, starting the engine was no problem at all. Sounded like 2 cranks and she lit up every time.

With the Power FC after, a full tune by the Hitman and the 30 min warm up idle setting, it takes about 8-10 cranks to start.

It starts every time, don't get me wrong.

Just thought it strange the standard Nissan did it better than the Power FC

Any settings i could be looking at?

Thanks

Birnie

  • 2 weeks later...

Chris (png_gozilla) please see here ->

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=127769

I moved your post so youll get a better answer in that section

hi, I've actually bought a used FC that has been in a car and tuned to 230rwkw with stock everything except cat back 3" exhaust. I have a full engine rebuild with ARC air box. full 3" to 3.5" exhaust will it be ok to plug it straight up or too much of a risk???

Also, i have an AVCR installed but never turned on, can i just use that boost kit and harness for the FC??? Or get it tuned straight away???

Just wanna be sure before i do anything??

Cheers in advance..

Edited by ib6ub9

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...