Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I love seeing other poeple jumpin left and right all over the place, punchung it off and on again.

Then i cruise along at about 40 and pass em just cause i know which lane will be better.

Hehe

:rofl: Our family car used to be a 47kW auto corolla. Lane choice was all i had... but as you said, it works!

Mark

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I too cruise around at 50km/h in 5th. Put the foot down a little boost comes up quick and accelerates away easily.

Since the new motor I also find my self pulling out of corners/round abouts in third and fourth from as low as 1000rpm.

I've always dropped it in fifth when cruising at a steady speed.

If I need to accelerate, drop it back a cog.

Maybe this is why I used to get 470km's to a tank of juice (50l) with the rb30det and recently managed 520km's from the rb30det? :rofl:

I too cruise around at 50km/h in 5th. Put the foot down a little boost comes up quick and accelerates away easily.

 

Since the new motor I also find my self pulling out of corners/round abouts in third and fourth from as low as 1000rpm.

 

I've always dropped it in fifth when cruising at a steady speed.

 

If I need to accelerate, drop it back a cog.

 

Maybe this is why I used to get 470km's to a tank of juice (50l) with the rb30det and recently managed 520km's from the rb30det? :P

lucky you i get about 200ks to 50l

170km/hr or so when you run out of 4th :rofl:

in the old r33 manual i don't think i ever really used it too much, except when on the freeways at 100km/hr (even then thats the top of 3rd if you are really hammering it).. but that was melbourne/crapville. I used to see 5th as the "sleep gear" - leave it and you tended to nod off .. :headspin:

i can't believe so many of you drive in 5th at only 50 or 60kmh!! It just feels wrong!

i usually change at about 3000rpm and only use 5th when I get to 90-100kmh!

if i had to sit in an 80 zone for a while i'd probably whack it in 5th, but if that dropped to a 70 zone I'd have it back in 4th...

Have a look at dyno read outs it shows the torque curve starting about 2200 on mine anything below that is hurting you motor. Read execive wear as oil is not up to it and if you listen you'll hear your motor groaning and its saying put me lower gear please.

If you are cruising you have very very minimal load on the motor.

With minimal load it doesn't hurt the motor to cruise around at low rev's.

My peak torque is at 2000rpm. 100rwkw which is around 150kw at the flywheel, using the formula Power = Torque x RPM / 5252 that would equate to some where around 740nM of torque. :rofl:

Sounds almost unrealistic.

I don't get it, I always cruise around in 5th so long as the car feels like it has enough "go".. ie down hills or higher speeds.

Why is it bad under 1000rpm?

are you serious? under 1000rpm the engine is either about to stall or blow, putting that sort of strain on the engine is just lazy - change up a gear.

Its actually something you can pick by ear. if the car is loading up it vibrates and sounds like shit bascailly. I found my rb20 if ther are no hills, and im not going to accelerate at all 70km/h was ok, but realistically 80km/h without putting excess load on the car

Ok after reading a lot of posts of why driving at lower revs in x gear is bad... anybody want to mechanically explain why its bad. It's all good to say something but without anything to back it up it means sh#t to me. I can see this thread as the type of thread which attracts lots of comments from kids who don’t really know what they’re talking about so that’s why I ask somebody to mechanically explain it so I can take the explanation literally & put those actions into place if I feel I need to.

Cheers,

Ok after reading a lot of posts of why driving at lower revs in x gear is bad... anybody want to mechanically explain why its bad.  It's all good to say something but without anything to back it up it means sh#t to me.  I can see this thread as the type of thread which attracts lots of comments from kids who don’t really know what they’re talking about so that’s why I ask somebody to mechanically explain it so I can take the explanation literally & put those actions into place if I feel I need to.

Cheers,

Have u even ridden a mountain/racer bike up a hill very slowly in the highest gear or gone from stationary in the highest gear??? If you have u will know it takes alot more effort/force/energy to do so than if u had it in a lower gear.

Same goes for an engine being loaded at a slow revolution in 5th gear where it is getting an unnecessary load applied to it

Have u even ridden a mountain/racer bike up a hill very slowly in the highest gear or gone from stationary in the highest gear??? If you have u will know it takes alot more effort/force/energy to do so than if u had it in a lower gear.  

Same goes for an engine being loaded at a slow revolution in 5th gear where it is getting an unnecessary load applied to it

Ok so how is this 'load' physically hurting the engine... name parts exactly...

Trying to ride a mountain bike up a hill in a higher gear doesn’t actually physically damage me, I'm simply not able to do the same thing 'pedal legs' as fast as if in a lower gear, no damage, just reduced speed / power / torque.

So now we come back to an engine, how is an engine different at lower speed as it is at higher RPMs. *pistons, crankshaft, cams, all move the same still, just different speed depending on RPMs*. Each piston ignites creating x amount of torque at the given RPM. Now once the RPM is low enough & cannot create enough torque to move the car in the higher gear how is this actually damaging the engine. Isn’t the engine really just doing the same thing as it is at idle RPM, the internals are still all moving the same BUT the only difference at that same low RPM a lot more Air & Fuel is being injected to try & get the car to accelerate at that low RPM.

This is my understanding of an engine & trying to get some explanation why low RPM in high gear is actually physically damaging / harmful to your engine, I heard someone say something about Oil before? Is oil the final factor? But at the moment with my limited understanding of engines I cannot see why an open full throttle at low RPMs is bad. Please correct / enlighten me.

dude why the hell would u even change at 2500 rpm's thats just silly

skylines can handel 5000 or 5500 quite ok

are yous all stingy with your petrol or did your pops teach yous all to drive

:D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And the full R32 GTR wiring diagrams are also freely available. Hmm.... there's supposed to be an auto replace that would have linked the thread. Here it is, manually  
    • Ahh...should have been clearer ~ there's 2 ... SMJ = super multi junction (connector)...   ...this is connector 6 & 25 in above image -- body harness to engine loom (6) & body harness to main loom (25) Headlights go to front via connector 6 ; fuel gauge goes to tank sender via connector 25  ...like I say this is R33 diagrams, but at a pinch R34 won't be too far different. *IF* the two ground faults are related, this can be the only place where both wires converge (as one runs to the back, the other to the front)... ....thing is, you probably need to establish if the faults are related (unless you examine that area and find obvious chaffing on the looms there to body ground)....*IF* the fuel gauge is still broken (full needle deflection), I'd be headed for the boot, remove fuel sender wire, key on and measure the voltage there ~ it should be roughly 10volts. If that's ok, check sender to ground resistance...if this is a dead short to ground (and there's fuel in it), then sender has failed or something funky has happened to wiring in the tank. edit: ahh...rereading the thread, this is R32....above fuel sender test still valid tho'
    • I just changed the timing belt on my RB25DET NEO and wanted to get some opinions. I’ve been super cautious, did a lot of research, and took my time. I’ve driven the car, and it runs fine. After warming it up, I revved it to 8000 RPM a few times—no issues, everything held up.   After the drive, I heard a noise that I think is either the clutch or possibly a tight accessory belt. It’s not constant, just comes and goes.   I took the timing cover off to double-check everything:   Belt is on properly, Tensioner is tight, Did the 90-degree twist test—belt isn’t too tight or too loose.     What still worries me is that I noticed the belt seems to sit a little toward the front edge of the gears, especially on the idler pulley. It even looks like it’s slightly coming off the edge there. Is that normal?   My old belt (5 years old, ~3,000 miles) also showed a bit of wear on that same edge, so maybe it’s just how it sits? I’m probably overthinking this, but since it’s my first time doing this on a NEO and the engine is forged, I really don’t want to mess anything up.   Also, I’m thinking of swapping to a clear front timing cover with the glass window. Would you recommend NITO or HPI? HPI looks reputable and their covers have 2.5mm thickness, but not sure if there’s a real difference between the two.   Any advice or reassurance would be much appreciated!
    • 40 grit sounds about right, to start. You make some decent cuts/damage in the coating with that, then rapdily scale up to maybe 80 and 120 for the bulk of the actual removal, then fine it off to 180 or 240 perhaps. No need to go any finer than that, and maybe no need to go even as fine as that. Wrap it on a big block and have at it. At least on the hub face.
    • Do the GKTech rear lower control arm mount relocation, and either alloy subframe inserts or very stiff subframe bushes. Traction is going to be at a premium!
×
×
  • Create New...