Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Did a search, didn't turn up anything solid…

For you guys running 18's on an R32GTR, can you please post:

1. wheel size (inc offset and width)

2. tyre size (inc brand)

I want to know what options I have for a set of Volk TE37s 18 x 9.5s +12 in terms of tyres.

I was thinking 245/40/18's or 265/35/18.

*The stock 225/50/16's have a rolling diameter of 631mm

*245/40/18's have a rolling diameter of 653mm

*265/35/18's have a rolling diameter of 643mm

I don’t really want to roll guards (but will if I have to), nor do I want to have *much* rubbing...

Which will be a better fit?

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/70119-r32gtr-18-wheels-what-tire-size/
Share on other sites

643 mm versus 631 mm = 2% conservative speedo readings. That would just about offset the factory optimistic (high) readings.

I have no problems with fitting 255's, so 265's would be fine.

I run 8" with 35 mm offset, so that's 137 mm out and 66 mm in.

A 9.5" with 12 mm offset is 133 mm out and 108 mm in.

Rolling the guards would not be required, the rims are 4 mm further in than the 8's but the tyres are 10 mm wider. So thats 5mm, further out, making the 265 tyres pretty much in the same spot outwards as the 255's.

Inwards clearance is therefore your only issue.:)

Something doesn't sound right there SK, a +12 9.5" should stick out a lot more than a +35 8".According to my offset calculator:

"The clearance from stut housing to the inside of the wheel will be 4mm MORE

The outside edge of the wheel will EXTEND an extra 42mm"

Unsure about offset. 18x9.5, 245/40's. The car is lowered a bit, and the rubber *just* clears the inside of the front guards. A greater profile wouldn't fit. And if you care, 245 on 9.5 leaves LOTS of room - if I did a gutter park, I'd prob scrape the rim first. That said, 245's tramline enough that I find it annoying - 265's may be worse.

Tyres: Yoko A539's + Federals (that hold better that you'd expect, unsure of model)

Mark

Something doesn't sound right there SK, a +12 9.5" should stick out a lot more than a +35 8".According to my offset calculator:

"The clearance from stut housing to the inside of the wheel will be 4mm MORE

The outside edge of the wheel will EXTEND an extra 42mm"

Let's do the numbers;

8" = 203 mm

Centre is 203 / 2 = 101.5mm

+ 35 = 136.5 mm out

Subtract 136.5 from 203 = 66.6 mm in

9.5" = 241.3 mm

Centre is 241.3 / 2 = 120.7mm

+12 = 132.7 mm out

Subtract 132.7 from 241.3 = 108.6 mm in

I think that comparison you are doing is maybe -35 to -12.:P

ferni....yeah i know what you mean. i turned right into a street when there was light rain, not speeding, not accelertaing, and the thing understeered and i almostdrove into the gutter! not looking forward to winter!

Marcus, im guessing you want 18s for a brake upgrade and also looks etc.

Id suggest sticking with 17s, you can fit just a wide a tyre on them , are always going to be lighter, cheaper to buy, and most importantly that cheater rubber you use on that cheater car is a damn site cheaper in 17s then 18s:)

With the right caliper and the right rim you will even be able to fit a 343 x 32mm rotor in there. Worst case scenario a 330 x 32mm rotor...combined with a nice alloy hat, larger diam and good curved vane design you should find the car stopping more consistantly with lower brake temps.

If you go 18s and want to run 355mm rotors etc, remember that a caliper that can saddle such a large rotor can also be a bit more expensive...but imagine how nice the car would stop with 355-365mm rotors and 18" semis:whackit:

LOL...move over and let me drive:)

Let's do the numbers;

8" = 203 mm

Centre is 203 / 2 = 101.5mm

+ 35 = 136.5 mm out

Subtract 136.5 from 203 = 66.6 mm in

9.5" = 241.3 mm

Centre is 241.3 / 2 = 120.7mm

+12 = 132.7 mm out

Subtract 132.7 from 241.3 = 108.6 mm in

I think that comparison you are doing is maybe -35 to -12.:)

S.K. you got it the wrong way around .

+ 35 means 35 mm offset to the inside , so + 12 will stick out more than + 35 .

In the example above +12 will be 132.7 mm in and 108.6 mm out . +35 will be 136.5 mm in and 66.5 mm out .

Marcus, im guessing you want 18s for a brake upgrade and also looks etc.  

Id suggest sticking with 17s, you can fit just a wide a tyre on them ,  are always going to be lighter, cheaper to buy, and most importantly that cheater rubber you use on that cheater car is a damn site cheaper in 17s then 18s:)

With the right caliper and the right rim you will even be able to fit a 343 x 32mm rotor in there. Worst case scenario a 330 x 32mm rotor...combined with a nice alloy hat, larger diam and good curved vane design you should find the car stopping more consistantly with lower brake temps.  

If you go 18s and want to run 355mm rotors etc, remember that a caliper that can saddle such a large rotor can also be a bit more expensive...but imagine how nice the car would stop with 355-365mm rotors and 18" semis

LOL...move over and let me drive:)

If you're going to cheat, do it properly! I was actually considering grabbing the GTR 17's from 2.06L Stacey...

But damn i love volks...

S.K. you got it the wrong way around .

+ 35 means 35 mm offset to the inside , so + 12 will stick out more than + 35 .

In the example above +12 will be 132.7 mm in and 108.6 mm out  . +35 will be 136.5 mm in and 66.5 mm out .

In my terminology + = positive

Hence +12 = positive 12 mm offset

I want to know what options I have for a set of Volk TE37s 18 x 9.5s +12 in terms of tyres.

:)

  • 2 weeks later...
hey do u know if i could fit these on my r32gtr

18x10.5 Offset -10

18X12 Offset -20  

thanks

Without flares, no chance. AFAIK 18x9.5 +12 is about as far out from the hub as you will be able to get away without the wheels protruding the guards.

That will be some FAT dish

  • 1 month later...
after some really quick help!!!!

R32 GTR with R34 GTR rims.... what tyre DOES fit.... who has them on there car?

Im looking at running the 265 35 18 RE55.....

if anyone knows for sure please reply :)

I am 99% sure they will fit fine. The stock 245.40.18's fit with plenty of space, so should be A-OK with the 265's

I will be running 265.35.18 RE55s' on my 18's when I can pay them off too :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This sounds very old of me, however since buying the Tiguan shit box, my view on shit boxes have changed.
    • I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
    • To be fair it's the other way around. 300kw is boring in a modern Golf or BMW. They are so competent / well-engineered / devoid of emotion that you have to go stupid fast to feel anything. Whereas the <300kw RB still makes all the right noises and it feels good to drive. Can pull off at the lights with the turbo whooshing and the blow-off pssshing and feel like the coolest kid on the block. Just don't look to the side where you'll see the bored housewifes in their shitbox Yaris/Corolla/Camry that kept up because you didn't go fast at all
×
×
  • Create New...