Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 310
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The only problem is you can't get good coverage of the results on breakfast telly the next day - well that is unless Webber does well or farks it!

At least it's getting mixed up a little, a nice change from last year where you only watched to see who'd take 3rd.

The only problem is you can't get good coverage of the results on breakfast telly the next day - well that is unless Webber does well or farks it!
That's a good thing though - that way it doesn't spoil the race when I get around to watching it after I get home from work :(

Doesn't look too promising for Webber tonight. Starting from P9 (probably P12 by the end of the first corner) means that a points finish may be all we can hope for tonight.

yah I hope our cricketers atleast do something good tonight - u guys hear that beaten by Bangladesh :confused:  

what is the world coming to :werd:

Yeah thats one game i wish i didnt watch!

I hada bit of a dilema,I got an exam at 9:30 tomorrow but i want to watch the F1.

My soloution: Sleep all day today(just woke up for a small feed) then wake up at 2:30 for race then study till 8 then leave for Uni.

Briliant!

Lowest Of Lows!!!!

:werd:

Bloody disgraceful.

Even though the withdrawal of the Michelin runners was not the direct result of anything that Ferrari (or the other Bridgestone teams) did, they blocked every attempt to somehow get the race running for the greater good of the sport and the fans. They could have installed the chicane before turn 12 which would have slowed the cars down enough for the Michelin tyres to be safe, but Ferrari blocked that resolution and therefore ensured we had no race to watch. Sure, the Michelin teams deserve to be very heavily penalised, but I don't think the fans deserve the same treatment. Even if the Michelin teams were excluded from the results or had a time penalty imposed so that it would be practically impossible to finish higher than 7th (ie behind all the Bridgestone runners), they probably would have decided run to at least get some exposure for their sponsors and for the fans, even though there would be little to race for.

Talk about F1 shooting itself in the foot in a such a competive market that it was already struggling to crack in the first place - shame on Michelin, shame on F1 and shame on Ferrari (the smirk on Jean Todt's face at the start of the race said it all).

But if turn 13 was the main drama, is it too much to expect that the drivers should be capable of driving thru that turn at a controlled set speed? It was a cluster fark to be sure:(

In the back of my mind, you have Toyota, BMW, Honda, Mercedes and Cosworth all fighting with the FIA and Ferrari, are we surprised they dug their heels in...roll on the end of the concorde agreement and the death of F1:( What are they calling the new alternate series this month???

Apparantly Ferrari said "it is up to FIA" regarding the chicane, they didnt give a direct yes/no. However, any chance they have of excluding teams in the past, they have always jumped on (read: Minardi in Melbourne). Michelin posted a number of options to FIA including running on non-qualifying tyres and being disqualified from points for this round, and the FIA said they would penalise so heavily no teams would think of doing it.

FIA needs to pull their finger out and realise they lost a shitload of future revenue in the American market and have upset alot of major sponsors.

On a side note, it would've been piss funny for Schumacher to take out Barrichello exiting the pits, leaving Jordan and Minardi to the top three :(

Well what a race. Got home at 10.30am today ready to watch the F1 (recorded) and my dad says something major has happened. Straight away I knew it was to do with the tyres (as reported by RPM on Sunday arvo) but I didn't think it would be this bad.

Michelin made a mistake, a mistake that will damage them for many years to come. FIA made just as big a mistake because they couldn't see the big picture.

If it was any other race track I dare say their would have been protesters running across the track but due to the fence design for the IRL/Nascar etc it held them all back.

I've got the whole telecast in mpeg format if anybody would like particular sections.

It has to be said that Max Mosley/Bernie Ecclestone and Michelin are to blame for this ridiculous situation. Michelin farked up in a major way no doubt about it. But blind freddy could see this situation was going to occur somewhere this year. Raikkonen's huge accident at the Nurburgring should have had alarm bells ringing but it didn't. We could just as easily being talking about his or Jensen Button's funerals after that accident!! Max Mosley is equally to blame for his incessant farking with the rules. He is why we have narrow track cars (which makes them faster in a straight line because of reduced frontal area) running on grooved tyres (great idea Max!!) . Top speed at the brickyard is 350km/h per hour with a concrete wall on the outside of the corner. How is this safe? If any of us were F1 drivers and the tyre guy says that the tyres might let go pitching you into a concrete wall at over 300km/h are you going to race on them? I think not!! And now they have to run all of qualifying and the race on one set of tyres. It has been over ten years since the last fatalities in F1 and ppl have forgotten to a large extent the damage those accidents caused the sport. The current configuration of the Brickyard for F1 is idiotic in the extreme and another prime example of Mosley/Ecclestone making sure they make PLENTY of money out of any race in North America and we will forget about the safety of the drivers. I am surprised the GPDA thought it was OK to race there with GOOD tyres!! It doesn't suit the cars/tyres and is just waiting to kill someone. What was wrong with Road America? Max/Bernie wouldn't make SH*(LOADS of money out of that track, that is what is wrong with it. The best thing that could happen to F1 is if Bernie and Max are not involved. Bring on GPWC i say. As for Todt/Schumacher's win at any cost mentality. Why are ppl so surprised? Schumacher won two world titles by crashing into ppl!! He even tried to kill his brother and teammate at Monaco this year with a suicidal dip at them over the start finish line! He unfortunately suffers from the same affliction as one A.Senna. He doesn't think he can be killed in an F1 car. He must now reassess his role in the GPDA as it must now be totally untenable.

Just on the point regarding using Indianapolis as the track for the US GP, I read somewhere that due to the already declining crowds there and the fact that the F1 GP is sandwiched between the Indy 500 and the Brickyard 300, there is serious talk of moving the GP to the Long Beach Street circuit. Sounds like a good idea considering that they'd be lucky to get a hundred people at Indianapolis next year after this years debacle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...