Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok I did a quick little search and everyone seems to be talking about turbos turbos and more turbos but not many people seem to talk about clutches.

So, I would just like to get a rough idea on people who are making the above mentioned power and what sort of clutch they are using ?

Ive talked to many mechanics and mechanically minded people alike and they all say that clutches are one of the hardest things to guarantee as it all depends on driving style etc.

Hence im interested in what the majority if the people with this sort of power are using and if you have had any issues with it.

Im still undecided between a Exedy 3 puck GTR clutch (single ceramic) or an OS Giken twin plate with sprung centre.

:rofl:

PS

Im referring to RWD skylines.

EDIT

After Krzysiu`s super fast reply, just wanna add. Could you please post how long you have had the clutch for.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77947-do-you-have-250rwkw-300rwkw/
Share on other sites

have had the clutch since about late last year. Really bad in traffic for the first week :( Rock Hard. Then it becomes more bearable. Have had 0 problems with this clutch and it bites down hard even at 6000RPM launches :rofl:

you definitly wont NEED a twin plate. there are some pretty usable but tough single plates out there. Im using a 9 puck extreme sprung centre single plate built for 220rwkw, but i have 265rwkw and extra sticky re55s AND i give it a fair bit. i can get it to slip if i drive stupidly, but for normal full throttle driving with normal gear changes its fine. As mentioned above you can quite easily get a single plate that can handle 300rwkw.

529rwhp(397rwkw) twin plate nismo clutch with sprung centre awesome clutch good everyday driver and has never slipped even at the drags running 11.3 126mph

Nice power and everything, but please explain how that helps him :rofl: buying a clutch that can handle 400rwkw for a car in between 250 and 300? :confused:

529rwhp(397rwkw) twin plate nismo clutch with sprung centre awesome clutch good everyday driver and has never slipped even at the drags running 11.3 126mph

you lucky bastard :rofl: Love the nismo clutches....

If thats the case im thinking maybe a twin plate would be overkill for 250rwkw-300rwkw.....

I have an Extreme extra heavy duty pressure plate with a 9 puck ceramic cushion drive plate, been in my car for 2 years with a RB30DET making 306rwkw. I have hadno problems with clutch slip, even with the extra torque the 3.0L has. The cushion drive plate makes it very good on take off, you can slip it out with no shudder.

Extreme also do a 5 puck for extra bite, but it can shudder a bit on take off.

im running a os giken super single. Its resonable fine in traffic as long as it aint on a slope - stop go stop go that is. Although makes a rattles noise when the clutch is in though, anyone know why this might be the case?

got gtr 32 with 300kw.

Got excedy single plate clutch with 3800pound pressure plate.

and i can do rev limiter launches and has never sliped.

But i think apart from power that causes clutchs to slip it also comes down to traction, i.e if u have slicks because u are rear wheel drive and they really bite with in turn can make the clutch slip or if the clutch bites and to much power no slip anywhere bye bye standard gear box..

but i dont have alot of experence with other clutchs all i know is i can launch my car with a single plate and it doesnt slip..

I have an Extreme extra heavy duty pressure plate with a 9 puck  ceramic cushion drive plate, been in my car for 2 years with a RB30DET making 306rwkw. I have hadno problems with clutch slip, even with the extra torque the 3.0L has. The cushion drive plate makes it very good on take off, you can slip it out with no shudder.  

Extreme also do a 5 puck for extra bite, but it can shudder a bit on take off.

I got this clutch as well for the last 2 years or so and has worked fine even giving it a pounding at track days.

It is a bit of a bitch in heavy 1st gear traffic as the friction point is very low to the floor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...