Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 378
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Coil OD = 60/60 mm

Wire OD = 10 mm

# of Coils = 7.5 turns

a lil ruff but best i cud do at the time

thanks :thumbsup:

60 mm OD = 40 mm ID, I have never seen a spring that small.

If you meant 60 mm ID, then;

Spring rate = 290 lbs/inch (5 kg/mm)

Cheers

Gary

yep my bad ment ID

looks like i need harder springs, still better then the stockies tho :laugh:

OK front rate for road tyres, a bit under done for R type tyres though.

Cheers

Gary

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey Gary looks like your the man for this sort of stuff

could you have a go at these coilovers??

Rear:

lower coil OD: 95

upper coil OD: 110

wOD: 13.5

no. of turns: 7

front:

lower coil OD: 100

upper coil OD: 120

wOD: 15

no. of turns: 6.25

cheers

Hey Gary looks like your the man for this sort of stuff

could you have a go at these coilovers??

Rear:

lower coil OD: 95

upper coil OD: 110

wOD: 13.5

no. of turns: 7

Spring rate = 350 lbs/inch (6 kg/mm)

front:

lower coil OD: 100

upper coil OD: 120

wOD: 15

no. of turns: 6.25

Spring rate = 500 lbs/inch (8.7 kg/mm)

cheers

OK spring rates for slicks, too high for everything else.

Cheers

Gary

Front:

Coil ID = 104/90 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 9.8 turns

Spring rate =

Rear:

Coil ID = 99/71 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 9.4 turns

Spring rate =

I believe they're Nismo low springs, not sure though...

Cheers.

Edited by _Scotty_
Front:

Coil ID = 104/90 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 9.8 turns

Spring rate = 120 lbs/inch (2 kg/mm)

From that low spring rate I assume that they are progressive. To get the actual (in use) spring rate you need to look at the coils, there should be some very closely wound together. They are sacrificial coils, they collapse onto each other as soon as the weight of the car is applied. Those coils need to be left out of the calculation.

Otherwise check the wire diameter.

Rear:

Coil ID = 99/71 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 9.4 turns

Spring rate = Spring rate = 170 lbs/inch (3 kg/mm)

These may be progressive as well.

I believe they're Nismo low springs, not sure though...

Cheers.

Coil ID = 146mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 5 turns

Spring rate = Spring rate = 95 lbs/inch (1.7 kg/mm)

Esplier springs apparently.

Is that a parrallel coil, ie; 146 mm all the way?

Cheers

Gary

  • 2 weeks later...
Front:

Coil ID = 104/90 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 9.8 turns

Spring rate = 120 lbs/inch (2 kg/mm)

From that low spring rate I assume that they are progressive. To get the actual (in use) spring rate you need to look at the coils, there should be some very closely wound together. They are sacrificial coils, they collapse onto each other as soon as the weight of the car is applied. Those coils need to be left out of the calculation.

Otherwise check the wire diameter.

Rear:

Coil ID = 99/71 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 9.4 turns

Spring rate = Spring rate = 170 lbs/inch (3 kg/mm)

These may be progressive as well.

Correct, they are progressive, so how about:

Front:

Coil ID = 104/90 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 5.5 turns

Spring rate =

Rear:

Coil ID = 99/71 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 7.4 turns

Spring rate =

100_2963.jpg

Any idea if these are in fact Nismo springs?

Cheers Gary.

Correct, they are progressive, so how about:

Front:

Coil ID = 104/90 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 5.5 turns

Spring rate = 250 lbs/inch (4.4 kg/mm)

Rear:

Coil ID = 99/71 mm

Wire OD = 12 mm

# of Coils = 7.4 turns

Spring rate = 230 lbs/inch (4.1 kg/mm)

Any idea if these are in fact Nismo springs?

Cheers Gary.

They are fairly sensible rates, which Nimso do occasionally.

Cheers

Gary

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey SK, springs in my old tanabe coilovers which I am thinking of putting back in measure like this:

Front:

ID: 62mm

Wire OD: 11.5mm

# Turns: 6.9 (2 sacrificial coils i think)

Rear:

ID: 61mm

Wire OD: 11mm

# Turns: 7.8 (2 sacrificial coils i think)

Some measurements seem odd but with digital callipers its difficult to get an repetitive reading, it seems that with the fronts they were thicker in the middle then the top and bottom but only by .5 mm so I just ignored it. Also the top and bottom of the coil are manipulated flat (2 sacrificial coils i think) so I don’t know if that affects anything but I would say most coilover springs are like that. They also have the little helper spring but as mentioned earlier that holds the main spring in and doesn’t affect the spring rate?

Do you know anything about the tanabe coilover shocks? They are height adjustable but not damper adjustable and are from the sus tec pro range (many years old).

Thanks in advance!

Edited by vespa
Hey SK, springs in my old tanabe coilovers which I am thinking of putting back in measure like this:

Front:

ID: 62mm

Wire OD: 11.5mm

# Turns: 6.9 (2 sacrificial coils i think)

490 lbs/inch (8.7kg/mm)

Rear:

ID: 61mm

Wire OD: 11mm

# Turns: 7.8 (2 sacrificial coils i think)

370 lbs/inch (6.7kg/mm)

Some measurements seem odd but with digital callipers its difficult to get an repetitive reading, it seems that with the fronts they were thicker in the middle then the top and bottom but only by .5 mm so I just ignored it. Also the top and bottom of the coil are manipulated flat (2 sacrificial coils i think) so I don’t know if that affects anything but I would say most coilover springs are like that. They also have the little helper spring but as mentioned earlier that holds the main spring in and doesn’t affect the spring rate?

Do you know anything about the tanabe coilover shocks? They are height adjustable but not damper adjustable and are from the sus tec pro range (many years old).

Thanks in advance!

Spring rate is obviously way too high for road work, even too high for track work unless you are using slicks. The best (cost effective) recommendation I can give is to stick the rear springs in the front and buy a set of rear springs around 225/250 lbs/inch (4 to 4.5 kg/mm). Tanabe shocks are OK in a typical Japanese way, not good but OK. Try the spring swap and see how you like it.

Cheers

Gary

  • 2 weeks later...
rear coil:

top 100

bottom 80

wire 10

turns 9

thanks

Are the top and bottom measurements the inside diameter? If so 80 lbs/inch (1.4kg/mm), which is very low.

Are they progressive coils? A number of coils that collapse onto one another as soon as the weight of the car is applied to them? Hence reducing the number of effective coils.

Usually around 4 coils, in which case the rate would be 180 lbs/inch (3.2 kg/mm)

Cheers

Gary

Can you knock these out for me, measurements may be off a touch as did them with shocks still on car & there was minimum room...

Note: springs are progressive, top 5 coils are wound tight, others are normal.

Fronts

Lower O.D. = 89.3mm

Upper O.D. = 89.3mm

Wire thickness = 12mm

No. Coils = 11.125

Rears

Lower O.D. = 85.6mm

Upper O.D. = 87mm

Wire thickness = 11mm

No. Coils = 11.125

thanks heaps!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...