Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There seems to be a lot of threads lot on what would win stock for stock for 0-400m and 0-100kmph. So I decided to make this list as a bit of a guide. Sources vary but I tried to take the manufactures claimed times were possible.

I will update it from time to time.

0-100kmph 0-400m

NISSAN

R34 GTT 6.2 14.2

R33 GTS25T 6.18 14.4

R32 GTST 6.5 14.8

GTR

R32 4.7 13

R33 4.9 13.2

R34 4.9 13.1

300ZX Z32 TT 2Seater 5.6 14.2

Silvia S13/180sx

CA18DET 6.9 15

SR20DET 6.2 14.5

S15 Jap spec 5.5 13.8

TOYOTA

MR2 GT 6.12 14.37

Soarer SC400 2.5TT 7 15.1

Soarer SC400 V8 8.9 16.5

Supra RZ 5.92 13.93

Supra SZ 6.6 14.9

Mazda RX7

86-88 Turbo 6.8 14.4

89-91 Turbo 6.5 14.4

95 Twin Turbo 5.2 14.0

Mitsubishi

99 magna V6 8.2 16.2

Holden

VN V6 man 7.9 15.68

VP V6 man 8 15.5

VR V6 auto 9.3 16.8

VN SS 7.4 15.24

VS SS 7.34 15.27

VT SS Gen3 6.4 14.4

VX SS 6.23 14.35

VY SS S1 5.8 14.24

VY SS S2 5.8 13.94

VZ SS 5.82 13.99

HSV

VP GTS 7.2 15.2

VR GTS 6.6 14.8

VX clubsport 5.7 13.9

VX GTS 300 5.1 13.3

VY Clubsport S2 5.3 13.5

Subaru

99 WRX 5.91 14.12

03 WRX 5.8 14

03 STI 5.43 13.62

Ford

EB2 6 9.3 16.8

EL 6 8.9 16.8

AU 6 8.8 16.3

EL XR8 7.5 15.5

BA XR8 6.1 14.1

BA XR6T 5.9 14.1

FPV

Typhoon F6 5.7 14.0

GT 5.9 14.2

Edited by Munna
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/80479-0-100-and-0-400m-times/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No mate. Drag is just dull unless the topfuel/doorslammer cars are running. I CBF hurting my car that way.

RWD's, I know of a slicked up GTSt that runs 10's so it would take me to 100 :P but most of the guys out there are running Jap suspension that just won't grip for the quarter. Even mine is too hard for the launch but good for circuit. Low to mid fives on street rubber is the best I'd expect from a T that is really well sorted as they have to balance revs/boost and wheelspin is just too easy to get.

0-100 4.5 damn best I can manage is 5.2.
It was in the cheater GTR though. Pretty stock but 260rwkw due to boost and fuel reg. Pretty easy to do and not hard on the gear. I use 5500rpm and feed throttle while I slip the clutch. Was a real buzz.

5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

It was in the cheater GTR though. Pretty stock but 260rwkw due to boost and fuel reg. Pretty easy to do and not hard on the gear. I use 5500rpm and feed throttle while I slip the clutch. Was a real buzz.

 

5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

Ahh cheeter 4wd wish I had one. Id find it very hard to do 5.2's consistantly with my rwd

Does anyone rate the Gtech for 0-100/0-400 times? I know they can't be exact - but are the newer versions pretty close to the money?

I do... MY 0-100 time on the g-tech was 4.8 seconds....

My 1/4 mile time was 13.3 seconds...

First time at willowbank raceway i got 13.7 and by the third run i had 13.23 @101

So i reckon the g-tech is pretty acurate (not as good as the real thing of course but its a great indication....

I do... MY 0-100 time on the g-tech was 4.8 seconds....

My 1/4 mile time was 13.3 seconds...

First time at willowbank raceway i got 13.7 and by the third run i had 13.23 @101

So i reckon the g-tech is pretty acurate (not as good as the real thing of course but its a great indication....

just brought one off ebay for $45 the early gtech pro model so when I get it I will let who all know how I go. I will lend it to a few of my mates with quick cars to and compare and list the results.

Nice effort Munna.

Where's my car? :O

I think the Gtech is quite accurrate however some runs may be questionable.

I did a few runs a couple weeks ago. Most were flat 5 but managed one of 4.57 so I doubted it a bit. Haven't taken car out again to confirm.

When it was stock the gtech did produce times which were similar to manufacturer times so I wouldn't say it's impossible to achieve the same results.

Gtech's are great if you want to see if your mods make much difference to the car. My times didn't change after getting the CAT back so it was useless besides the sound, however after getting a tune it gave me a smile.

  • 2 weeks later...
I think your wrong on the r32 gtst 6.9 claim.

In the japanese import buyers guide, the test results of 0-100 times for even an AUTO r32 gts t was 6.89 seconds, and if this was manual the tester expected low 6 second times.

Yep thanks mate did some more research and the time I had was probably for an auto. Found a couple of sites which claim around 6.5 and 14.8.

cheers

  • 3 weeks later...
5.2 is good for rwd. I find the more power, the harder to stop wheelspin in the GTSt

Best I managed in the R32 with the Rb20DET was 5.2, it was consistent and easy to launch.

The RB30DET.. :P Initially I lost 1 whole sec, 6.2, zero traction in first, second is fine providing the change is smooth.

I've since managed to get it down to 5.9secs, the trick was not to over-rev it, change at 5100rpm and its fine. lol, damn small turbo. :huh:

6.9 0-100 for the R32 I think is on the money. Mine was damn slow when 100% stock and making 115rwkw. :blink:

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Stock ECU (or more accurately stock tune) absolutely refuses to go over 10psi and behaves like you have seen. The Nistune is the same if it is the stock tune. If the Nistune chip has been tuned, the resulting tune could be literally anything for any combination of parts. The Nistune just makes the stock ECU Tunable.
    • So stock ECU does not like anything above 10 psi?  That Nistune one is just for "try" if it will be any different, I know it need to be tune for that. I know but YOU may know about these problem but i/we dont. They few little Skylines here let alone people who know anything about tham so that is why iam asking here  
    • So now we have a radiator with no attachments whatsoever. It lifts up with a particularly tight spot between the drivers side air box mount and the lower radiator outlet, but if you've got this far you will sort that too. This is the lower mounts with the rad out so you can see where the rubber bushes go, it is a straight shot upwards Done! Assembly is the reverse of disassembly, with blood less likely to be shed.
    • Right, onto the second last trick. The Air Con condenser is mounted to the front of the radiator and stays in the car when the radiator is removed. There are 2x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the condenser to the radiator, remove those The bottom of the condenser is attached to the radiator with clips. You need to lift the condenser out of those clips and clear (up, then forward). f**ked if  could work out how to do that last bit with the front bumper on. I hope you can, and you share the trick.  Bumper removal probably deserves its own thread one day once I've recovered the will to live, but basically you need to remove the wheels, front inner guard liners (clips and 10mm headed bolts), the self tapper between the guard and the bumper at the rearmost point of the bumper (same as an R32 that bit), any remaining clips at the top/front of the grill, an absolute bastard design with a plate that holds the top of the bumper above the headlight each side (only 1 bolt which is tricky to get to, but the plate catches 2 places on the bumper and must be removed....carefully!) and push clips between the bumper and guard under the headlight. If you've done all that you will be faced with wiring for the fog lights on both sides and in ADM Q50 RS at least, 4 nasty tight plugs on the driver's side for the ADAS stuff. So, the clips at the bottom look like this on drivers side (looking from the front) And on the passenger side (also from the front), you can see this one is already out Clearance on both of these are super tight; the condenser needs to move up but the upper rad support mount prevents that, and the radiator can't move down far because it is (rubber) mounted. Once you achieve the impossible and drop the condenser off those mounts so it does not stop the rad moving, you are good to go
    • OK, next the shroud needs to come off and there are a couple of tricks. Firstly, there is a loom from near the passenger side headlight to the fans, coolant temp sensor etc and there is no plug to undo.  In my case I was OK to leave the shroud on top of the engine so I just undid the passenger side fan plug and about 10 of the clips which gave enough free wire to put it aside. The fan plugs were super tight, the trick I used was a small falt screwdriver to push down on the release tab, then a larger flat screwdriver to lever the plug out of the fan unit....be careful with how much force you apply! If you need to remove the shroud altogether for some reason you will have to deal with all the plugs (tight) and clips (brittle)....good luck. I removed all of the clips and replaced them with cable ties that I will just cut next time. Also, in the Red Sport / 400R at least, the intake heat exchanger reservoir hose is bolted to the shroud in 2 places with 10mm headed bolts; so remove them (the hose stays in the car; no need to undo it at the t fittings down at the radiator lower mount. Once you've dealt with the HX hose and the wiring loom, there are 3x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the shroud to the radiator; remove those.   The shroud then lifts out of the bottom mounts where it sits on the radiator, up and onto the engine out of the way. Simples
×
×
  • Create New...