Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Whats your favourite car manufacturer?

Mine would have to be TVR, they make the wildest things out there...and they are priced so that if i ever got my ass in gear, then well in 3-4 years i could perhaps afford one...which is a huge encouragement as a Sagris is about my dream car.

Ill take one in white of dark grey/anthracite thankyou:)

Right Click_Save As_24meg vid

462Sagaris_Rear_Qtr.jpg

http://www.tvr-eng.co.uk/intro.html

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/82238-favourite-car-makers/
Share on other sites

I gotta agree. I love the TVR cebera speed 12 . ugly as hell, but a race car with indicators.

I have been in one and it was loud, and the fastest thing i have ever been in.http://www.pistonheads.com/tvr/cerbera/gt2_2.htm

they dont have airconditioning or a real interior for that matter, or a radio.

Looks alone :

Only British car i like is the Aston Martin.

Old or new, horniest looking cars out there.

aston_martin_vanguish_KM_dt_05_06.jpg

84_Aston_Martin_V8_Vantage_DV_05_Scars_07.jpg

1977_aston_martin_v8_coupe-1.jpg

Porsche GT is a close second, than come the usual exotics like Zonda, Ferrari, Porsche, even the M5 and RS6 etc...

I must be one of the few that don't dig the Gallardo, or any Lambo for that matter.

Astons are awesome things, the old twin supercharged V8 Vantage was so cool...but come on Emre, we both know i dont have any class so i couldnt even comprehend owning an Aston

Saw one of those new 6.0L V12 Astons (silver) on the Eastern fwy after picking up R32_bigboy heading up to DECA. LOL he was flying and i was gating it trying to keep up so we could take some shots...sadly i was too slow:(

...oh and link fixed

I love the look of TVRs, but they're built like shyte. Every component in them is British made, and it shows. Those things will shed parts like pets shed fur in Summer.

They've also got the twitchiest handling, which is great if you're a race car driver but scary if you're a normal person. In the wet, even race car drivers have issues (I've got a video of Martin Brundle attempting to drive a couple on a wet track).

As a carmaker, I like Honda. Their cars tend to be solid engineering-wise, and they cater for their target market very well. The Type-Rs are track weapons, the Accord is a fuss free and benign family car, and the Civic has always been a fuel efficient and easy to drive small car (until it grew and got replaced by the Jazz).

I can't see myself ever buying a Honda (I'm not fond of peaky engines in street sports cars, and I really don't like FWD in any vehicle) but I wouldn't hesitate to recommend them to other people who don't have the same requirements as me.

If you're talking sports cars, I'll take a Lotus. I'd love an Elise 111R, but if you handed me the keys to an Esprit or Elan I'd cope.

What you said about TVRs is true of past cars, and to me all part of the cars character:)

But since that ricj Ruskie took over there have been huge changes at TVR, and rebviews of the Sagaris etc say that they are changed things with leaps that can be measuered in light years as far as build quality.

Those Brundle vids are good, but they are over 3 yrs old and before the new ownership. AS for in the wet handlign, any rwd car with over 300hp is a barrel of laughs:)

yeah gotta agree the TVR's are nice lookin cars, i like alot of them , they jst have sleek designs, im not really a fan of anything british but TVR's.... :P

as for any other car makes i wouldnt know where to begin, alot of different cars appeal to me.... like newer Ferrari's ( its the italian in me ), to some mercs, so alota jap cars ( hence me owning one ).... to even some american cars.

What you said about TVRs is true of past cars, and to me all part of the cars character:)

But since that ricj Ruskie took over there have been huge changes at TVR, and rebviews of the Sagaris etc say that they are changed things with leaps that can be measuered in light years as far as build quality.

Those Brundle vids are good, but they are over 3 yrs old and before the new ownership. AS for in the wet handlign, any rwd car with over 300hp is a barrel of laughs:)

Barrel of laughs? You've got a wicked sense of humour. :cheers:

I like TVRs, ever since I saw Tiff's review of the Tuscan. Just hearing the car fire up and the angry note from the carbon fibre rear tanks just gave me a chubby. But since its a British car with British people building them, I'll wait 2-3 generations in before checking their build quality again.

Rome wasn't rebuilt in a day, and think about how long it took between when the NSX came out and when Ferrari released their first ever car that had a warranty....

I don't mind Audis, it's the understate looks that I prefers and they give you a pretty long leash in regards to modification, possibly the only manufacturer that I know of. But for and out there car an F430 got my money, I drove one of these at prior to the Australian release day on the coast, all I can say is where do i sign up. Nothing that I've own or driven in the past even remote comes close. Also my pet hate would be the Pagani Zonda, Saw one in real life and for the money they're asking is ridiculous. It's basically a kit car made in Italy with a german heart, and not a good one at that. Also no heritage .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...