Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Just a question on Ceramic coatings.

I have just bought some s/h Mines Dump pipes. I already have some HKS front pipes. New turbos are on their way.

When the whole system is apart and out of the car, I was thinking of ceramic coating the Dump Pipes and Front pipes to keep the heat in and therfore keep the gas velocity up. (as well as keep a little heat out of the engine bay).

I have heard/read of ceramic coating causing issues.

Some say only coat the outside of the pipe.

Some say do inside and out.

Some have even said don't do it as it makes the pipes crack??

My gut feeling is to do both inside and out, and that the ceramic would actually make the pipes last longer as it would be keeping the extreme temperatures from reaching the actual metal itself.

Then of course there are a few different flavours of ceramic coating...

Any experiences? Recommendations?

Cheers,

Matt.

  • 3 weeks later...
bumpy

anyone one have where when and how much in sydney

cheers

Peter

I understand that the only ceramic coating for turbo manifolds is the Black stuff (extreme coat),as the alloy looking ceramic can,t handle the excessive temps,and after awhile cracks and flakes off.Also the black coating is much more exspensive.

Try High Perfomance Coatings. www.hpcoatings.com.au

I understand that the only ceramic coating for turbo manifolds is the Black stuff (extreme coat),as the alloy looking ceramic can,t handle the excessive temps,and after awhile cracks and flakes off.Also the black coating is much more exspensive.

Try High Perfomance Coatings.    www.hpcoatings.com.au

spoke to them 450

man im going to have to rob a bank

how much is thermal tape

Normally you coat in & out.

I thermowraped mine. The roll was about $50. Pretty easy to do, and just as effective IMO. Some say it makes the metal fatigue over time but after 2 years of using it, I've had no troubles at all. You'd be foolish to wrap a turbo manifold however.

Competition Coatings in Guildford NSW did my dump, manifold, exhaust housing etc etc. much cheaper then HPC and do the same thing, and the stuff is still looking good on my car after 2 years

How do you rate it Roy? Besides the fact that it still looks good of course. Do you think that there really are benefits in better spool time and more power to be had from it all?

I'm sure it keeps underbonnet temps down a little - and perhaps even extends the life of the components coated - but I am more interested in the true gains in performance, and keeping the ait flow up.

A negative feature was suggested to me: And that was that since I am keeping the exhaust temp so hot (because it can't lose heat so easily) that I would be putting further stress on the internals of my turbine and bearing etc! <_< catch 22? Or irrelevant do you think?

If you are hopign to get something ceramic coated and see a performance gain, then id say there are better waysto spend your money.

That said, mine is ceramic coated, adn wrapped in exhaust wrap (why is it not a good idea to do the manifold???) and the under bonnet temos are now much better. Before with just the ceramic coating, they were better then without, but still far from acceptable.

On a whole, helping the life of a component (corrosion protection etc) the asesthetics, the under bonnet temps and the theoretical gas velocity improvement etc...adding it all up its agood thing since its reasonalb y cheap....but i would be amazed if you made a single hp more, or boost came on any quicker

I've done it on a couple of motorbike manifolds (CBR600 for Formula SAE cars). HPC coatings in Brendale, QLD did ours. It is hard to believe we got any Hp gain but they are still going strong after two years of 13,000 rpm rev limit driving, not a hint of flaking or rusting of the metal underneath (inside or out). We are pretty sure it helped the heat radiation, the exhaust manifold was less than 200mm from the drivers back, obviously there was a couple of thermal sheilds (sheets of ally and a carbon fiber seat) between the driver and the manifold. Overall I think it is pretty expensive for the gains and I would not be doing it unless someones gives me $100,000 to build a race car again.

Your SAE car cost 100K!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  My god, which Uni?

2003 University of Queensland

Yeah, we burned cash that year, we found the most expensive everything and used that. The uni really wanted us to win so they gave us a blank cheque. We did have the best car by a long shot - first in acceleration and enduro and first placed Austrlian car!

I own the car now, I bought it off the team last year minus the engine and few other bits, see my thread here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...=0#entry1528749

Edited by JCMarshall_Law

People use the hpc coatings for pistons...so they must hold up pretty good...i know they do alot of race cars and drag cars cause theres genereally a pantec parked in their lot every month or so.

If your keeping the heat in...i would think since the flow is going towards the exhaust and outwards then it wouldnt sorta reverb back onto the head and block...but your engine is constantly being cooled anyway...if anything it would simply be decreasing the cooling job of the coolant making its job a little harder.

Every jap race car i see has their manifold completely wrapped. Good or bad thing? Gotta find a middle ground for everything, less heat radiation and improved heat energy flow or excess heat and wear on engine and attached ancillary items. Overall prob doesnt make a massive difference. Only massive difference is ofcourse decreasing the under bonnet temp as stated already. But for wear and performance issues prob not so much.

Edited by r33_racer

I just wrapped my new dump pipe over the weekend.. makes a massive difference to underbonnet temps for what its worth.. i'd estimate around 10-20 degrees after pushing it.. and you can pretty much touch the dump pipe after running it, which would melt your fingers instantly if it was just the plain dump.. The turbo seems to be sitting a bit cooler as well.

you'd need a couple of rolls for a twin.. this is about as far as i got on the single..

dump03.jpg

Doubt it will matter unless u are sitting on boost all the time.. for a street car probably not worth it.. but for heavy track, mountain, or drift use when you're always on the boost it would make a difference.

  • 6 months later...

Time to resurrect a thread :)

So I have a few parts I want to install on my R32 GT-R shortly...

1) HKS GT-SS

2) Trust/Greddy Front Ext. Pipes

3) Magic Cat

4) Fujitsubo exhaust

Anyway, I need some advice on the best way to insulate the various parts. I did a search, and found this, this and this threads helpful. However I still have questions :(

Lets start with.... what exactly should I be insulating? Manifolds, exhaust side of turbos, front pipes and cat? Are there any other parts? For instance, SK mentions wrapping the heat shields as well. Should I insulate up to, or including, the cat, or all the way to the muffler?

Next, what's the best method for each part. The major ways I have come across are (a) exhaust wrap (b) ceramic coating ( c) HPC. Everyone raves about HPC, but I am always amazed at the cost: e.g. $400 for a manifold. Some say that wrapping can lead to cracking, but Rev210 is definately of the opinion that wrapping is just as good as coating and the cracking issues are overblown.

So what's best? Should I wrap the dump/fronts, manifolds and cat? That still leaves the turbos which obviously can't be wrapped, so I have the choice of a turbo bag or some sort of coating. Turbo bags seem to be about $200-250ea (so about $500 for both) which seems a little exxy. R32 TT: how much was the ceramic coating that you got done?

Anyway, some suggestions would be appreciated. :whoops:

heat wrapping/coating anything after the exhaust housing should only be considered for under bonnet heat issues or other heat related issues, there is no performance gain to be had.

in fact in theory, not having it wrapped and allowing more heat dissipation will allow more mass of exhaust gas to flow through the exhaust, as it is denser. although this gain is probably a minute and immeasurable amount, it tells you that there isnt anything to gain either.

So what's best? Should I wrap the dump/fronts, manifolds and cat?

you shouldnt wrap or coat your cat at all, you dont want to cook your cat !

heat wrapping/coating anything after the exhaust housing should only be considered for under bonnet heat issues or other heat related issues, there is no performance gain to be had.

in fact in theory, not having it wrapped and allowing more heat dissipation will allow more mass of exhaust gas to flow through the exhaust, as it is denser. although this gain is probably a minute and immeasurable amount, it tells you that there isnt anything to gain either.

you shouldnt wrap or coat your cat at all, you dont want to cook your cat !

I'm not interested in proported performance gains. Heat is the real issue as it can adversely effect reliability and longevity.

Regarding wrapping the cat, Thermo Tec believe its fine and I have read in another thread that its acceptable and actually improve the emissions performance because the cat reaches operating temperature sooner.

Edit: Quite the contrary of what you have said regarding exhast gas flow, I have also read on numerous occasions that its advantageous to keep the heat in (again, this goes back to the proported performance gains).

do both if you can afford it.

For those with room in the backyard for an old oven or kiln you can buy the exact same ceramic coating stuff in tins and do it yourself. Search on google, there is a site in the US that makes this stuff.

The performance gain comes from retaining the thermal energy inside the pipe. If you can retain the engery in the pipe the velocity of the gas increases as it has more energy. Cast iron is better than mild steel uncoated in this regard. Quite a good idea to coat the exhaust turbine housing and then turbo beanie it too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The attached document is fine. I just downloaded & opened it.
    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
×
×
  • Create New...