Jump to content
SAU Community

So, Ah... How 'bout These New Forums Eh...


Recommended Posts

hmm i do like the new layout

allthough the dark gloomy colours dont really do it for me\

2 things also

trader ratings? where have the gone? :rolleyes:

and

Text box response at the bottom of threads, rather then having to click "add reply"

:)

other then that im happy

-Ruffels

also.. a light coloured background so u dont get the white bits around the smiley faces come up and also... im not a fan of the RB25de or what ever that is

i knw its the better engine against how many posts you have lol

but it would be good if after "x" amount of posts you could change it to something else

also More PM space... it says mine is full ;)

-Ruffels

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

at least ur a turbo im a non turbo RB26!

ferni - what would u know Member No.: 7,973?

forum whipper snapper :rolleyes:

pfft lets compare icq numbers then, i don't think my clipboard can copy and past yours since its that long - 51639313 ;)

112866 :)

Damn me only buying a skyline 18months ago. Gimmi a lower number :)

post preveiw hover thing

Delete threads

quick reply

bigger avatars

some black in the background

(slightly) bigger font

... what else am i missing?

It seems slower

I can't delete or change the <<< RB25DE thing

has anyone else noticed the weird 'frame' around the smilies now? :rolleyes:

what i dont like about this new layout is that u cant scroll over the thread post to get a preview of the post content. it just gives u the post details of date/time/who...

anyway, just my useless feedback.

but otherwise overall layout appears more logical.

look, its all gonna take some time guys.

things like cutting the edges off the smilies and stuff is hardly the main aim of the Admins.

Getting permissions right and migrating the data are obviously the frst things.

Moderators have no power at the moment due to various things.

Just sit tight.

Give it a week and see how things are then

Lots of reccomendations are cropping up which im sure will be looked at

PM box limit is now 100messages, it used to be 200 messages. this is really annoying, coz i had to go throuhg and delete 60 or so messages this morning so my PM box would let me receive messages.

also. "fast reply" and trader ratings as mentioned above

what happened to the quick reply box at the bottom :)

i think i need glass's

Please read the Feedback/Ideas section

There is lots of information about these things

PM box limit is now 100messages, it used to be 200 messages.  this is really annoying, coz i had to go throuhg and delete 60 or so messages this morning so my PM box would let me receive messages.

also. "fast reply" and trader ratings as mentioned above

Well feel for some of us others mate. I had 500 pm box space and im now down too 300. Imagine what i had to clean out :)

Things will be fixed in time.

Trader Ratings ATM - on hold as far as i can see

pfft lets compare icq numbers then, i don't think my clipboard can copy and past yours since its that long - 51639313 :)

112866 :)

Damn me only buying a skyline 18months ago. Gimmi a lower number :)

lmao icq.... pffft who uses that anymore? :)

ooooooooooone more thing...

"yes uncle?"

when creating new posts the background colour of the section to write headings and topics is the same colour as everything else which looks poo and hard to see when posting new topics etc.

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooone more thing

"yeeees uncle?"

there are some good features on it which have been mentioned... so its not all for the worse

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooone more thing

"what uncle!!?"

You have 195 messages out of 500 maximum storable messages

so suck it down lol

Well we seem to have a Fast Reply button now, but I think we need to fill in the background :(

Or transparent...either way...

I like the new layout. :)

Once we fix up the few niggling problems, all will be good again! :)

EDIT:

I did notice one thing we'll have to look at...

I'm happy to do it if you chuck me up as a mod for a few days ;)

Basically we need to update linking threads from within threads...

As an example...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...&threadid=13305

won't work anymore...

it needs to be...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=13305

Slight difference, 404 error avoided tho ;)

Easy enough.

Finally I can post.

They are pretty cool - sopme of the features that are missing are (I believe) in the process of attempting ot be re-instated.

For those who reckon the blue is too hard to read, go to the Skin Selector on the bottom left hand side and select IPB Default Skin (its white and much easier on the eyes than the dark blue).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...