Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Umm im not sure how to put this cos i dont know too much about it so i thought id just throw it out there.. I have a t3/t4 (to4e) and its spooling a little too late (5k+) so yeah, i got the car tuned at uas and they suggested changing the exhaust housing on the turbo to allow it to spool a little earlier (4k would be appropriate). Has anyone had experience in this area and would anyone be able to suggest which type of housing would suit my application?? thanks guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/83497-changing-exhaust-housing/
Share on other sites

RB20DET? RB25DET?

complete rundown

RB20 det

polished

balanced

strengthened valve springs

had the head machined

copper head gaskets

billett adj cam gears

front mount

pod filter

forged pistons

o-ringed

wallbro 500hp intank pump

GTR injectors

wolf 3D v4 ecu

top mount manifold

catch can

to4e turbo

external wastegate 38mm

turbosmart series2 bov

custom dump

3in exhaust from turbo

i think thats everything

yeah, i understand its not in the league of 'todays' turbos as in response, power pp,lag, but i got it for relatively cheap, and after spending a fair bit on the car i know im kinda bottlenecking it with this turbo..but guys, as we all should know, sometimes our hands are tied and have to make do with what we have..and by any means, bringing on boost 500rms faster is nothing to gawk at. Im just trying to make the most of what i have, thats all, thanks for the response.

here's my educated guess -

Its an RB20 coming on boost at about 5000rpm. Thats gotta be a .86 exhaust housing. Plus the fact the its a dirty old t04e turbo, which will be a roller bearing.

He needs a nice little HKS2530 or something arouind that size, or even a hiflo job of a T3 or t28.

But overall, he needs a turbo with a .63 or smaller exhaust housing and it needs to be a ball bearing turbo.

Now, if you have the money, I'd look at what they have said, a Boost controller with a pneumatic spring or an electronic one to prevent wastegate creep, but I'd also look at either cams or a exhaust cam gear to bring it on earlier again.

My guess it isn't. :mellow:

Clint32 ran a TO4E with a .6 comp cover, 54mm comp wheel, .6 turbine housing and 58mm turbine wheel on his 100,000km' RB20DET.

That didn't get going until 5k.

I've just had a quick look and it made 234rwkw on 16-17psi.

here's my educated guess -

Its an RB20 coming on boost at about 5000rpm. Thats gotta be a .86 exhaust housing. Plus the fact the its a dirty old t04e turbo, which will be a roller bearing.

He needs a nice little HKS2530 or something arouind that size, or even a hiflo job of a T3 or t28.

But overall, he needs a turbo with a .63 or smaller exhaust housing and it needs to be a ball bearing turbo.

Now, if you have the money, I'd look at what they have said, a Boost controller with a pneumatic spring or an electronic one to prevent wastegate creep, but I'd also look at either cams or a exhaust cam gear to bring it on earlier again.

I dont think its that easy. I jumped down an A/R housing size and was surprised i didnt gain more response, sure it got better but he physical difference was huge and the difference in response was about 500-600rpm. The thing could have a huge turbine on it, could be back cut etc, in which case the A/R housing will not do a whole lot.

I could put a 0.48 housing on a T78 and the thing still isnt going to be responsive (not to mention surge)

As for needing to be ball bearing, again i dont agree it needs to be. If i was buying a turbo i would try to make sure it was ball bearing, better durability and improved performance. But ball bearing dont mean squat if the wheels and housings on the turbo aint right. Try my so called truck/plain bearing turbo having the same response as RB20s with 2530/2535s, there is much more to the equation then just the fact that something is plain bearing vs ball bearing etc.

Also i found that housings can get expensive...id live with it for as long as you have to until you can afford a new Garret, they can be had for around $1800, sell the T04E for upwards of $500, rather then spending money on a compromised turbo setup.

LOL..so far two of the better turbo setups on Rb20s on SAU have been plain bearing old school turbos, just well matched ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reading through the engine service manual their advice is do a cylinder balance test. Unplug one injector at a time and see if the idle drops a consistent RPM. You can also do this using a Consult cable which is easier. They also call for unplugging the power transistor, then with the engine off and the fuel rail unhooked from the manifold verifying that you have good fuel flow (even injection, no dripping/leaks, etc) when you twist the CAS by hand. Also verify the spark by pulling the spark plugs and allowing the plugs to ground and turning the CAS by hand. I would also start doing the sensor checks and idle valve checks in service manual. Make sure the MAF tests reasonably, the intake air regulator is sane, etc. You may have to get new spark plugs.
    • This sounds very old of me, however since buying the Tiguan shit box, my view on shit boxes have changed.
    • I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
×
×
  • Create New...