Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

xd9's look best in 17x9.5+17 fr and 18x10+18r

you can go either of those sizes all round, but if you want the 18's all round be prepared for a decent amount of wok to get the fronts to fit,

Skyline model = R33 Gtst

Wheel diameter = 18" Rays Gram Lights 57Gainer

Wheel width = 9.5"

Wheel offset = +22

Tyre size = 235/40/18.. Nitto NT05 front, Federal 595 rear

Modifications to fit = all guards rolled

30iyz9u.jpg2v94rdj.jpg

2a6o2g6.jpg

346mgia.jpg

Haven't really seen many 34 gtt's with aggressive fitment so thought i should venture to push the envelope on fitment.

What are thoughts on running 18x9.5 +19 Fronts and 18x10.5 +14 rears on 225/40 front and 235/40 rear tyres

What sort of guard work do you guys believe would need doing and opinions on the matter

:)

Edited by Akshay

Thanks bud, just stock arms but I've got some bushes in the back to pull a bit of camber out.

Maybe -2 or so?

cool.

Iin the photos, it almost looks like the front poke a little more than the rears.

Did you have to roll the guards pretty much flat? I always thought the guards would need a light pull front and rear with those sizes but they dont seem too bad in terms of how much they sit out of the guard either.

Any chance of some front and rear pictures in line with the side of the car that show exactly how much they sit out?

cool.

Iin the photos, it almost looks like the front poke a little more than the rears.

Did you have to roll the guards pretty much flat? I always thought the guards would need a light pull front and rear with those sizes but they dont seem too bad in terms of how much they sit out of the guard either.

Any chance of some front and rear pictures in line with the side of the car that show exactly how much they sit out?

No pulling/pumping, only rolled the lips up.

I'll get some pics up soon

What suspension HEKT1K? Do you get any scrubbing over bumps up front or anything?

Tein Super Streets atm... but they are pretty much stuffed, so I'll be upgrading to something a bit stiffer soon

Doesn't really scrape unless the wheel is turned, going up crappy driveways etc. I'm sure with some harder coilovers it will be even better

2zpo56u.jpgf0c8eo.jpg

Tein Super Streets atm... but they are pretty much stuffed, so I'll be upgrading to something a bit stiffer soon

Doesn't really scrape unless the wheel is turned, going up crappy driveways etc. I'm sure with some harder coilovers it will be even better

That fit is prefect. I can't believe they fit that well with just a roll!

How do you think the rear would go with a 255/35? Probably need a pull to get it under you think?

483063_10151078184335520_2126650698_n.jpg

18x9+7 front 18x9.5+7 rear

awesome fitment im looking at 9.5 +15 all round on 235/40/r18. So 2mm further in on the front and 8mm further in on rear. How much camber are you running and what work did you do to the guards.

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...