Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Okay so it has come down to the day of actually pretty much buying my rims.

Starting to get cold feet!!

18x9.5 + 22 like what Hectic is running

or be a little safer and go

18x9.5 +30

I CANT CHOOSE!

The +30 will be a little better for not getting police attention.

Would the guards still need a little roll even if I am running camber from my coilovers

I have some XT7s on order, 18x7.5 +35 fronts 18x8.5 +32 rear. Just wondering what size tires you guys recommend for a nice fit for these rims. I'm not a fan of stretched or balloon looks

What do you think of toyo proxie 4s?

I'm kinda a granny driver lol but I occasionally give it a squirt. My r32 is basically stock, just an FMIC an uped boost, at a guess 160ish KW

The kumhos, are they a soft compound? How much are they roughly?

Im getting some racing hart rims for my R32 GTR and want to know if they will fit.

They are 19x10.5 +15

Ive been told they will fit. Ive looked up the jap site for the rims and think they might be 19x10+15 tho.

Anyway will these fit under my car?

What mods will be needed so theres no probs?

Im getting some racing hart rims for my R32 GTR and want to know if they will fit.

They are 19x10.5 +15

Ive been told they will fit. Ive looked up the jap site for the rims and think they might be 19x10+15 tho.

Anyway will these fit under my car?

What mods will be needed so theres no probs?

I would be keen to get that checked. That is a VERY large rim for the 32gtr. 33/34 R's may be able to run them but I am under the impression the 32 guards are smaller then 3/4s. Can anyone back me up on this?

Found out they are 19x10+17

Trial fitting tomorrow then choosing the tyre size. Bloke reckons prob 265 max on there.

Will put up pics when fitted. Fingers crossed. Definately going to fill the guards. lol

Found out they are 19x10+17

Trial fitting tomorrow then choosing the tyre size. Bloke reckons prob 265 max on there.

Will put up pics when fitted. Fingers crossed. Definately going to fill the guards. lol

Yeah, even 265's may be a sqeeze. I got 245 running on 10.5 and it has decent stretch, but not too excessive. 265 is the optimum size (I do believe) for 10's. Do 32 Rs come with 17's from stock?

I ended up swapping my CR Kai's for Buddyclub P1 Qf's. My only concern now is that I've gone from a +22 to a +17 and haven't had a chance to trial fit. Will they fit ok? Will I have an issue if I want to upgrade to bigger brakes in the future?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...