Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I dont want to start crap but wont reliabilty become a big issue constantly producing those numbers????

yes your right it does become an issue as 270-280rwkw is the limits on stock internals as it has been proven time and time again..

u can have it tunned perfectly but at the end of the day it wont b reliable if your running that sort of power everyday ....

so its an accident waiting to happen...

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

whats the point then.

The car is in a magazine. Need I say more? At least the owner seems realistic about his car.... personally I worry more about the err 'less educated' Skyline owners who will read the article and think that 300rwkw is an appropriate figure for their stocko engine.

oh sure....... what you need to understand is that i have just seen the dvd and after thorough anaylsis ive decided that this fool is a disgrace to my fellow skyline enthusiasts.......

i was wondering what gets u off more, driving ur playboy skyline or sittting at home pulling urself off to the 'price is right'..............????????????

oh sure....... what you need to understand is that i have just seen the dvd and after thorough anaylsis ive decided that this fool is a disgrace to my fellow skyline enthusiasts.......

i was wondering what gets u off more, driving ur playboy skyline or sittting at home pulling urself off to the 'price is right'..............????????????

Is it school holidays already? :wacko:

Great first post to introduce yourself to your 'fellow skyline enthusiasts' mate.

next week buddy..............

it might as well be

the amount of kids driving around in r33's these days and not to mention how cheap skylines are getting, makes u wonder if they really are worth their value.....

SKYLINES are cheap jap shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

get a real car, 1999 pink barina running 11's.

next week buddy..............

it might as well be

the amount of kids driving around in r33's these days and not to mention how cheap skylines are getting, makes u wonder if they really are worth their value.....

SKYLINES are cheap jap shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

get a real car, 1999 pink barina running 11's.

HAHAHAHAH U f**kING KEYBOARD NINJA!

just ban this cock flavoured lolliepop!

HAHAHAHAH U f**kING KEYBOARD NINJA!

just ban this cock flavoured lolliepop!

4evagtrs u fcuking retard, fcuk off these forums and go mess with your little friends during lunch time. Sick of all u dreamers. Thizzle is a mate of mine and unlike half of al the bullshit artists/dreamers on these forums talking their cars up and what they plan to do, Thizzle has actually gone and done it. Not to mention how hard he has worked for it. Maybe you like hid skyline or do not, keep your negative criticisims to yourself, so when oneday you buy a car whatever that may be you will get the same respect.

next week buddy..............

it might as well be

the amount of kids driving around in r33's these days and not to mention how cheap skylines are getting, makes u wonder if they really are worth their value.....

SKYLINES are cheap jap shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

get a real car, 1999 pink barina running 11's.

Whats up pal? Didnt you get breast fed this morning?

sorry guys this thread was a waste of time...

reason i was writing this post was i have currently achieved 231 rwkw on 14psi on a hks 2535.

i want to put bigger injectors in and add 3-4 psi of boost, but i was doubting if my engine could handle it

Edited by reflex

reflex u can easily do it. im making 240rwkw on 17psi, no worries have had that going for 6 months now. anything over 250 is a little worrying, but when you think about it anything over standard will decrease the life of your engine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...