Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In the interest of science, I'll keep going to the drag strip. Then the intercooler people can do likewise (as they already have anyway) and we can see who has the quicker time. That sounds pretty easy I reckon. I have 'hosed' quite a number of the fmic brigade on the street to back up my time (on private roads), so it's not just a drag strip phenomina.

He he he, that's true - people should go to the strip :mad:

What I'm trying to take out is driver skill. Drag racing on the strip does take a fair bit of driver skill, so if we can take out that we can have a true comparison between cars.

Anyone can mash the go peddal at 70 and hold it flat to 140. But getting someone (Mr Joe Bloggs) to launch good is another thing.

Originally posted by rev210

BYBY,

I am taking 200+rwkw to be about 310HP at the flywheel. I dont think the stock turbo can move this much air at 1bar. At least why would you go a 2530 for a power increase when they are rated at about 310/20 HP?

Well, the fact is it can. As has been proven many many times over

I should add the beatings occur on 'standing' and 'rolling' runs with said other skyines with stock turbos and fmic's.

My advice if you have a fmic and a stock turbo is : run 1.5bar through the stockie and have some (brief) fun, then replace it with a turbo that is propperly matched to the horsepower flow of the intercooler. It's just like porting the heads, port to big for a little cam and carby and things don't work all that well in the response department.

I'd say there are lots of people running fmic designed to flow over 450HP! that is not a huge intercooler BTW, but boy is there a difference between 300HP and 450HP in air flow. For a front mount to work well, and I think they possibly can on a stock turbo, you need one that juuust flows well enough to 300HP or maybe a snick under.

BYBY,

show me an 'engine' dyno of the stock (unmodified) turbo making 310HP and I'll give you the points.

310HP or so in an R33 is mid 12 1/4mile, I don't think so. Unless you can show me a 12.5 sec stock turbo'd R33, don't care if its got slicks or runs on rocket fuel BTW. Once again I'll give you the points if you can.

Rev - Please, don't get me wrong. Your car is a quick car, I don't dought that for a second.

What I'm trying to do is get a good (as equal as possible) comparison. Take out the variable of driver skill and make it based on car performance only.

I'm willing to wind down my boost to 10psi and do a few runs with a mate with a video camera in the car (on a track :mad: ).

I'm not trying to say mine is faster than yours, and going by the times you have, I have no dought that yours is quicker, but I'm just interested in the comparisons on the above test.

Like I said, just for interests sake.

J

Why must you sway off the topic here. We are not discussing quarter mile times, obviously if you want to head down that road there are several other variables you must consider not jus tthe cars power. Power does not equal quarter mile time.

200rwkw is by no means whatsoever an unreachable figure. Plenty of people on here are hovering around the 200rwkw mark with the suggested modifications. If you want dyno sheets find them yourself. A number of the more reputable workshops in Sydney all give the same advice and confirm that the power level is possible although at 200rwkw or anything over your turbo is coming to its limit.

Perhaps you know more than Sydneys best tuners and performance shops.

Perhaps NOT

A interesting discussion here. I believe both sides of the argument have raised valid points. On the dyno, we have seen 2rismo’s car push out over 190rwkw on 11psi which is around 240kw (320 hp) at the crank. But the trouble is the turbo might go bang tomorrow or in 2 years time. You just don’t know with the ceramic turbines.

Rev - no one here discounts your achievements with the set up you got. Probably the best bang for buck skyline in the land. I honestly don’t know how your car achieves the terminal velocity it does on the modifications you have carried out. At first I thought you had a 50hp shot of nitrous lurking somewhere but other then that I wouldn’t believe what you are getting without the time slip. Well done :mad:

Originally posted by Ustasa

A interesting discussion here. I believe both sides of the argument have raised valid points. On the dyno, we have seen 2rismo’s car push out over 190rwkw on 11psi which is around 240kw (320 hp) at the crank. But the trouble is the turbo might go bang tomorrow or in 2 years time. You just don’t know with the ceramic turbines.  

All I am suggesting is that the stock turbo can not flow 320HP worth of air on the skyline motor as is. This is a real 320HP at the motor. That is quite alot of power in my books. I'd just like people to understand that the rear wheel dyno is for 'tuning' and is not a cross-comparable power/accelleration evaluator to bench mark every skyline on. However as I said before I am fine with being wrong on this one.

The dyno is a 'bragging' tool for sure... just doesn't mean much when you get your ass handed to you by someone who has 'less rear wheel horsepower' in the same weight car.

Good you have 200rwkw! Care factor for me... 0%

Wow you gained 30rwkw, though a mod on the same dyno & day! Care factor...80%

It's all relative so lets just race!:):D :D

Why wouldn't 320hp be achieveable at 12psi+ when standard they produce 250hp at around 7psi. A stock R33 makes roughly 130rwkw, if you mod it to 190rwkw thats a gain of 60kw or 80hp, now 250+80=330hp!

Another factor to consider with FMIC is that they will probably have a richer A/F ratio than with the stock IC due to the denser air, so without a SAFC or computer change then no they probably won't be better, but they DO NOT cause lag unless it's a poorly built one with huge pipes that have nasty right angle bends, then maybe.

While were on the discrepency's of Dyno's what about the accuracy of Drag strips, how do we know that your 13.4 104mph is correct? I've seen plenty of mid 13 sec passes and rarely do the mph go higher than 100-101, is there an altitude advantage in Perth compared to Melb or Sydney?

But I guess you should be commended in your different approach to speed, afterall the quicker your engine can reach redline the faster you will go, so maybe we should all experiment with lighter pulleys etc... a higher than 4.11 diff ratio could also lower 1/4 times but I doubt many would want to do that.

turbomad,

agree with you on the lag, I think you miss the point I am making (my fault , I don't state things clearly very often). The turbo will still produce boost at such and such rpm. How long does it take to get to that rpm, well thats where extra pipe work don't do you favours.

Drag strips are fairly accurate mate, after all it is a bona-fide sport . Unlike dyno printouts, where there are no officials and not a great deal of specators. Then again with the interest 'import' drivers have on dyno results perhaps we could make a sport out of it too.

The mph thing is like this ; gearing and traction can make the requirements for a higher mph less significant, try a 360ci V8 charger doing 13flat with a 100mph terminal. Or a 98mph 13.4 with a GTiR (4wd). Mph is significant when looking at a standardised gearing set and tyre setup, like a stock skyline ( diff and gearbox) running road tyres.

Well Mz Merli and Mz Donnon, I think you should both sit in seperate corners and don a DUNCE hat each of you!........ See, I equate fighting over the internet the same as the 100m sprint at paralympics..... Sure one of you might win..... but at the end of the day your both still very very handicapped.......

Originally posted by MaTBoY

See, I equate fighting over the internet the same as the 100m sprint at paralympics..... Sure one of you might win..... but at the end of the day your both still very very handicapped.......

That'd be funny if I hadn't heard/read it a 100 times already :P

just my 2c..

shouldn't dyno reading be taken before and after mods?

eg Martin dyno's reading for his r34 was ~148rwkw stock then after mods, ~200rwkw?

Whereas my r33 gtst stock figure is around ~130rwkw, after mods, ~173rwkw.

alright feel free to take me down.. :P

Originally posted by diduc

just my 2c..

shouldn't dyno reading be taken before and after mods?

eg Martin dyno's reading for his r34 was ~148rwkw stock then after mods, ~200rwkw?  

Whereas my r33 gtst stock figure is around ~130rwkw, after mods, ~173rwkw.

alright feel free to take me down.. :P

You are right. the figures don't mean much except the relative change in power. The outright figure I couldn't care much about, but the magnitude of the change is always worth a look.

The mods in both cases yielded an increase in power, thats good. However people ought not to get hung up on expecting the same power output, or power increase for the same mods on a different dyno on a different day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
×
×
  • Create New...