Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all,

over the passed weekend i installed an intercooler kit myself in my r32. a few dramas but it went in alright. the problem now is that it doesnt feel any better, even somewhat worse. :P

after a drive i feel the end tanks of the intercooler, the intake being hot'ish and the outlet being very cool, so im sure the air is actually going through it, and theres a noticable amount more lag, but it feels asthough its lost a bit of power. i used to be able to chirp second (gts4) but cant even do that now.

that might not be the best measurement of power, but from everyone thats installed an intercooler, theyve said theres a noticeable difference, even my mechanic mentioned one he isntalled on an auto had it spinning first whereas it couldnt prior to the install.

can anyone think of maybe some common problems, something i may have overlooked, something this or that? im sure everythings on right.

shaun.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94963-post-intercooler-kit-problems/
Share on other sites

What supporting mods do you run? It may need a quick dyno retune if you have an aftermarket air / fuel computer.

I put a fmic on 2 weeks ago onto my Stagea, and it definately needs a retune of the SAFC.......

intercooler is not a power upgrade on its own!

sorry sorry, i also have a podfilter, cat back exhaust, (batmbl dumppipe is going on as i type this), iridiums (gapped at 0.8 if that makes any difference), running stock boost (which peaks 12 and settles at 9psi).

it feels like i had better performance with the smic on a cold night then i do with the fmic on a cold night.

s.

power comes on more gradually with a fmic cause there is more air between the turbo and throttle body but at full throttle higher in rev range u may have a bit better power but less ability to chirp so push in the back can seem less but still have more peak power

as all the others have said. when you just fit a fmic you wont gain any power or less any. but you will loose throttle response. ie: more lag in the throttle system as discussed many many times before. fit a boost controller and an exhaust now and youll gain much more than last time and response will be great too as you make the outlet system more efficient (bigger exhaust) and inlet system pump more air (boost controller)

A cooler on its own wont give you much gains however if you bump up the boost and free up some flow with some flow with an exhaust etc if there are no leaks you should really be able to feel it. Another thing is when I installed my fmic my car was running very rich this robs alot of power also, so a tune mite do you good eg safc or power fc. :(

okidokies,

well i have a full exhaust now, and it does feel more powerful and responsive (especially mid range for both), but also at the same time, feels its holding back a little.

the intercooler is 600x300c75.

boost also still drops off top end. i thought it was the stock -restrctive- intercooler that caused this. still doing it. makes me wonder if theres something restrictive in the new setup.

i might throw it on a dyno, im thinking theres too much little things to figure out by explaining it all :( :(

thanks very much for the input people, greatly appreciated.

shaun.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...