Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was at the place where i get my car scerviced today and there was a kid there with his silvia on the dyno.

I got to talking to him as he was tuning his car and i was curious as to what he was doing.

He was doing a power run, looking at the AFR's and then putting a resistor between the AFM and the ECU!!!! he would do another power run and check the AFR's.

I informed him this would lean out the AFR's right accross the range and he looked at me like i was an idiot!! and said to me Look at the afr's man, its rich right accross the range, sure enough he was right!!!

He was upping the resistance value each run by 0.02 of a watt.

I saw the figures, before and after, and he went from 152rwkw to 164rwkw and his afrs were still below 12:1

He said by doing this he had illiminated boost cut, advanced the timing, and was using less fuel.

Not bad for 6cents for the resistor...

why is it stupid if done monitoring the AFR's?

it is doing the exact same thing as a safc except right accross the rev range. and providing you don't go too lean what the hell is wrong with it?

I think in the right application it is fine.

I mean, if worst comes to worst hes only going to blow up a CA or even better an SR. Good for him!

At least he is smart enough to test it, not just read something on the net saying use a xx resitor, it will help.

I wouldn't use a pot, apart from getting the right value, as there's vibration, moisture issues etc...

Once you have the right value, measure the resistance, then put in a fixed resistor - You don't want your afr's changing at every pothole, of it it rains :-D

yeah thats what i was thinking about a pot. as soon as you bump it you lean out.

CA's have feelings too! just because they are a bit "special"!!! there seems to be no love for the CA anymore:(

Its just as dodgy as bleed valve boost control. Plenty of people use that without concern.

Both too dodgy in my opinion, but those using bleed valves for boost or fuel cut defender are just as bad. He is loosing flow of electricity instead of air.

[qoute] Its just as dodgy as bleed valve boost control. Plenty of people use that without concern.

Both too dodgy in my opinion, but those using bleed valves for boost or fuel cut defender are just as bad. He is loosing flow of electricity instead of air. [qoute]

haha! that means I am a bad man... I have a turbotech bleed valve, I am a very bad man...

BMW's group A cars back in the 80's were tuned using the same method, it worked well for them.

Thats very interesting. I used to love those John Player Special little black BM's:)

Edited by CEF11E
Its just as dodgy as bleed valve boost control.

*sigh* i love these types of un-educated comments.

How can you even remotely say that?

I was running a bleeder of my gate upto 24psi... 7psi through the valve and a hold in the line for a bit more

It never spiked, never changed the level of boost, never gave a reason for me to think i'd wasted $10

Correctly done a bleeder can be of the same level as an EBC without the mammoth expense.

I'll point out what i see as an issue with this idea.

he is adjusting the AFM reading accross everything. It is not dependant on RPM / Load / Temp / Conditions.

Sure he is testing on the dyno I assume full power runs at full throttle.

I would say he could get that quite right.

I doubt he tested all rpm / load conditions at all temps.

If he leans it out with this method, everything is leaner !!

Things like close loop driving will be leaner. Light throtle leaner. Cold start leaner etc etc ....

Sure he can leave a "buffer" but as you can imagine it would not be an ideal way to do things.

Closed loop wont be leaner. It will adjust fueling based on 02 sensor output!!

It's dodgy but hey if you dont go too far it should be ok. I mean you wouldnt do it to an expensive engine..

for the cost of a jaycar DFA or SAFC you are smarter to do that...

ahhh, silvia owners. Got to love it.. where their wallet is as small as their brain..

you might want to take that back moron.. sure some silvia owners are stingy bastards but you gotta remember were not all like that

im also sure there are skyline owners just as stingy out there aswell

asswipe

Wazz

Edited by Wazz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Actually, that's not entirely true. It's also the same motor in the 1st gen Nissan Cube but they're rare as hen's teeth.  
    • Yeah it is always worth testing and balancing actuators out of the box, just set the pressure regulator on a compressor very low (eg 5 psi) and increase it slowly to see when they both move.....unfortunately while you may be able to adjust the length of the actuator rod to minimise any difference, the actual pressure they move from is not adjustable so you need a well matched pair. And yes, the VCAM is probably contributing; the earlier in the rev range they come on boost and the slower the revs build (I think your demo was in 5th), the more you notice it.  Driving at WOT through 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc you will probably never hear it as any shuffling starts and is over super quickly
    • oh they were with that motor, you need to remove the engine to change the spark plugs (don't have to, but it does make it easier)
    • I certainly fall into the annoyed camp, but glad to hear that if it's happening at low boost then I'm not likely going to blow a turbo and end up with metal shards in my oil. Just feels like it prevents me from really driving it without hesitation and "peak" performance. Wonder if it's the VCAM, it did an impressive job of shifting the torque curve and faster spool, but maybe now it's "too fast" and there's too much air for how open the throttle is.  Based on some other threads, will also do some reading on synchronizing the actuators. They are the default actuators that come on the Garrett's and I would think they would be set the same coming from the factory, but if the turbos don't actually work exactly the same way at the same time as previously mentioned, it would be worth making sure the actuators are actuating together properly
    • I went down this rabbit hole before, ended up sourcing a motor from the UK (I'm in Japan) which also didn't function correctly. With the original motor, I disassembled it and reassembled it and it works somewhat, sometimes. What I could deduce from all my screwing around is that there is calibration of the gears on the inside of the motor and two ramps on the main gear which activate switches that operate the motor and move the sunroof either to retract into the roof or tilt. Where I got stuck was that, it seemed in my case that one or both of the switches that are activated by the ramp on the gear did not always activate and thus the motor did not move, causing it to sometimes not retract or tilt (apologies, I've forgotten which way it didn't work.).  Of course this part is discontinued at Nissan now, it's the same part in the S15 but no other models. I also contacted the manufacturer of the component for schematics - forgot the name, they're based in Gifu - but they declined to share the information due to being bound by an NDA, sadly. Looking through my pictures now, it seems I last had a crack at this in 2022. See, I so kindly wrote "open" and "close" next to the switches. If you figure it out, please do tell me. Those little switches, with the red buttons may need to be replaced.
×
×
  • Create New...