Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Man not another f**kn thread bout this car lol.

Whats this like the 5th thread haha

Peace

hey... its not as bad as signing every post with "peace" hehe

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i think they meant rice because they arent modified performance wise.

im pretty sure the 1 at my work has a fmic and thats about it. from memory it has the stock exhaust.

its a 93 model too, so they are very early R33's, and $25k ? i wouldnt pay it...but maybe thats just me

LoL maybe.

But I'm a fan of "looks."

I don't think improving the looks of your car = rice.

And if someone else does, then who cares? To hell with em, its your car, do as you wish. 99% people outthere aren't even aware about the concept of rice lol. They think a car that looks good, goes good must be good.

For me...Rice is doing up a car the sux all together, such as an excel etc.

Peace.

The first 'wydeboy' r33 to be produced was IQ Auto's yellow one..It was the fattest 33 to hit the streets (apart from a slick GTR of course :) )..Now though, they're butching the kits up with these mocks which you see plenty of here and there.. IMHO, the 34 rear lights look shocking on the 33 body..The quarters though, i love :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just put in a 1JZ, and sell me the NEO head 😎
    • Oh, it's been done. You just run a wire out there and back. But they have been known to do coolant temp sensors, MAP sensors, etc. They're not silly (at Regency Park) and know what's what with all the different cars.
    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
×
×
  • Create New...