Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

#Porsche supercar:I cant remember what it is called exactly but the brakes are fkn massive.See pic.(track day car/sunday driver)

#Bugatti veyron.(casino car)

#ferarri enzo.(track day car)

#Nismo z-tune r34 gtr (daily driver).

#maybach whatever so i can be chauffeur driven in luxury

All street driven cars.Lol.I dont like my chances at getting any of these insured at my age or the ammount it would total :(.Doesnt include my full house race cars.

:(

post-8610-1138010626.jpg

1. 1960's Aston Martin DB5

The name's Bond.  James Bond.  The ultimate gentleman spy's sportscar.  Option up the missles, oil slick and ejector seat and you too can be working for Mi6.

Why have a DB5 when you could get the DB5?

http://www.drive.com.au/editorial/article....vf=2&bg=24&pp=1

Hmm...

Porsche Carrera GT (pose mobile)

Gambella GT750 (good idea from above) (a people carrier)

Westfield w/SR20 (supercharge it, play with it, race it)

Porsche 993 911 turbo (daily driver)

Jaguar XKSS (hard to decide on the classic)

that's 3 for Porsche, 1 for NZ and I NEVER thought I'd consider a jag until festival of speed.

  • 3 weeks later...

1. 2006 Ferrari F1 car (for track...)

2. RS-R Supra (for drift...)

3. Ferrari F355 Spyder (for weekend cruising...)

4. R33 GTR 400R (who wouldn't!!!)

5. Evo IX (daily driver...)

post-17810-1139778252.jpg

post-17810-1139778433.jpg

post-17810-1139778536.jpg

post-17810-1139778561.jpg

post-17810-1139778804.jpg

Edited by Frink

Porsche GT3 RS

BMW M5 (Daily Driver)

Audi RS4

Mine's R34 GTR or R34 GTR Z-Tune (undecided!)

Mercedes Benz SLR McLaren

Nice!!!

Edited by Savage Bliss
BMW M5 (Daily Driver)

Audi RS4

Just curious as to why you'd have both an M5 and RS4, and use the bigger of the two cars as the daily driver.

I'd probably amalgamate both of those and get an RS6 Avant :P

Just curious as to why you'd have both an M5 and RS4, and use the bigger of the two cars as the daily driver.

I'd probably amalgamate both of those and get an RS6 Avant :(

Tough decision between the two I know, I was going to go for the RS6, but prefer the M5 for a number of reasons (too many to mention) oh and I should've specified that the RS4 was in the wagon version... which would be used more so for weekend driving, throw the stupid kids in the back, stupid dog... go thrash it!! And have a picnic... :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...