Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 503
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Oh and its not 1 lap. You'll get several shots at it. It's just that each "time" will be based upon an out lap, a timed lap, then a cool down lap. So umlike a normal sprint day which is 3 or 4 times laps in one session this will be just one (which seems stupid IMO as everyone will get less laps consequently but no one said autosalon were the best organisers in the world)

Definitely an important minor detail missed (by me)! It didn't mention anything about cost on the application form but I have learnt that nothings free!

If thats the case this event is going to cost them a fortune to bring cars from around australia to wakefield park which is definitely not convenient for anyone other than people living in canberra.

I wonder how they are going to cover their costs??? MASSIVE SPONSORSHIP?

Edited by nfi

Last year they ran their Street Car of the Year thingy which included a session at Wakefield.

A mate of mine from here in Vic went in his Supra. They gave him $1,000 for travelling expenses. He never had to pay for anything for the weekend.

This seems to be a similar thing. So if they want to accept me I'm there.

Well, if its free and you are going..then ill see about seeing if they will let me enter. If there is a track in Aus where i may be able to get close to you, within 1 second its goign to be Wakefield. My car should be good for similar lap times to the Supra. I have doen that many laps around Wakefield, that will eb the onlything helping me as you guys will be having to learn the track with very little track time....:D

...but odds are they wont be interested in letting a GTST enter?!?!?

LOL - I have to be accepted first as well.

Hell - they might not want another GTR there since we can be pretty sure the Autostyle one will be there. And they also might not want one that could BEAT that one. That would look bad for one of their major advertisers.

Actually - speaking of Autostyle - they have that Mines GTR copy there dont they? Since this is supposed to be in the vein of the Tskuba battle thingy I wonder if Autostyle will bring that (if they still have it)

Its been over 2 years since i went there, (since moving to melb basically)

With std turbo and ECU, but with exhaust, FMIC and 150rwkws with Falken 451s with a Whitelien suspension kit i was doing 1:13.4 from memory. (It was in the 1:13s somewhere)

These days, i have semi slicks, and 230-240rwkws, and better suspension and brakes..so would hope that i can get into the 1:09s or better?!?!?!

Do it Roy.....! You would definitely make the competitive pile. If you need an application form I can try and get the magazine with the form photocopied and scan it... I think the application forms have to be in by the 31st from memory.

I just want to see a presence from SAU.

Edited by nfi
LOL - I have to be accepted first as well.

Hell - they might not want another GTR there since we can be pretty sure the Autostyle one will be there. And they also might not want one that could BEAT that one. That would look bad for one of their major advertisers.

Actually - speaking of Autostyle -  they have that Mines GTR copy there dont they? Since this is supposed to be in the vein of the Tskuba battle thingy I wonder if Autostyle will bring that (if they still have it)

Dom tells me his own personal R34 is quicker around a circuit than the "Mines" car they have in stock....its a weapon built on a budget that makes me ill.

If you can lap Wakie quicker than Domenic Russo ill eat my rear seat!

Didnt his car do high 1:08s or even 1:09s? Seriously, get ready to eat that seat as given enough laps to get to know the track Snowman will beat it. The ICE Supra would have beaten it last year if not for the dramas it had after the drive to Syd :)

GTRs still suck...and when is the actual day, as im in and out of country working OS at the moment? Ill put in an entry, but they will tell me to go away as my car isnt anyhting to look at, and there are quicker cars out there that look good to boot...but if the date works for me then ill try :)

...ok proviso...there are plenty of quick cars getting around...and rumour is the Autostyle cars can go quicker then in the Auto Salon shootout thingie last year :domokun:

Didnt his car do high 1:08s or even 1:09s?  Seriously, get ready to east that seat as given enbough laps to get to know the track Snowman will beat it. The ICE Supra would have beaten it last year if not for the dramas it had after the drive to Syd ;)

GTRs still suck...and when is the actual day, as im in and out of country working OS at the moment? Ill put in an entry, but they will tell me to go away as my car isnt anyhting to look at, and there are quicker cars out there that look good to boot...but if the date works for me then ill try :O

He's done high 1.05s low 1.06's in his lowly 180sx

Brisby you need to stop drinking before you get on these forums. And leave the talking it up to your own deeds - not mine. LOL

BUT - if I do get a shot (which is unlikely since I'm not an Autosalon regular) - given a decent amount of notice I'll try and get the engine sorted beforehand. Then we'll see.

Shame its not at Winton or a track I know. Again "if" I get in I might have to arrange a trip to Wakefield for a day to check it out beforehand.

Brisby you need to stop drinking before you get on these forums. And leave the talking it up to your own deeds - not mine. LOL

BUT - if I do get a shot (which is unlikely since I'm not an Autosalon regular) - given a decent amount of notice I'll try and get the engine sorted beforehand. Then we'll see.

Shame its not at Winton or a track I know. Again "if" I get in I might have to arrange a trip to Wakefield for a day to check it out beforehand.

Don't get me wrong Snowman...i wish you all the best mate...But...to say your going to come up here and hand out a driving lesson is a little big headed. There are guys up here who can drive too...who don't always sit on chat forums.

Don't get me wrong Snowman...i wish you all the best mate...But...to say your going to come up here and hand out a driving lesson is a little big headed. There are guys up here who can drive too...who don't always sit on chat forums.

I think its more to have a bit of a joke and a p|ss-take with that Drunkan bloke... with those banana boats

;)

I think its more to have a bit of a joke and a p|ss-take with that Drunkan bloke... with those banana boats

;)

ahh well if thats the case, let me join in then......at the same track day...if my memory serves me correct, the banana boat struggled to break 1.15....lol

Edited by DiRTgarage

Haha - I wasn't planning on giving guys like Dom a lesson.

It's a long standing joke between a few of us regular Vic drivers (Me, Scotsman and a few others) and some of the NSW boys (like Duncan) that the NSW GTR drivers can't drive because it seems the fastest lap time are all (or were) set by GTST drivers as far as these forums are concerned.

There are some amuzing threads hidden away on these forums about which is faster on the track between a GTR and a GTST. This is what I was going on about.

I don't claim to be anywhere near the fastest or best driver out there. I mean look at our current SAU circuit times leader board. I am on top of say the Sandown times with a 1.22.

But I know of 5 GTR's here in Vic which are running sub 1.20's including one in the 1.14's and one in the 1.15's (on semi comps). I'm way off those guys.

But also looking at the SAU times for wakefield I see on top is gaint (Russel) whom I know from competiting against at the Dutton and since we both got damn similar times at Winton (0.1s different) I reckon I could try and give his top time of 1.07 a shot.

I don't know how that time would go in this competition.

I mean you don't know who will actually be in it. I was invited to attend the circuit battle for Serious Performance 8 dvd at Calder early last year. The only cars of note there were the Ice Supra (which set the 2nd fastest time in Autosalons Street Car of the Year Competiton last year at Wakefield behind Dom) and the Chasers R34 GTR. I ended up winning that competiton easily even though back then I had much crappier suspension than I do now and the stock brakes. As perviously mentioned my car is hardly the fastest track car around but it was the fastest there on that day in a comp similar to this one.

I have entered , should be good fun.

i hope you'll be there snowy, and any other guys off here for a gtr assault!!

free entry and prize money sounds good to me!!

there are some very nice cars hidden around the place that should be out racing.

some of our cars are just perfect for this sought of thing i hope it goes smoothly and takes off.

cheers Russ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...