Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've got a series 2 PM35 and I can tell you now that getting a new valve body isn't as easy as it seems. It might just be that I'm in the NT but my valve body has died on me and it's been a massive job trying to find a new valve body for the car.

Only recently I found out that the valve body in a pm35 box has a mechatronic unit that needs to be programmed with the vehicles VIN number to work. Next was trying to find a new valve body assembly, couldn't find a shop in australia that could sell me one to suit my car. I finally found a company in Vic that had a contact in Japan, they found the part number I needed however nissan don't sell the valve body assembly anymore. The contact in Japan is now going to the manufacturers of the valve body and asking if it would be possible to get 1 more unit made.

I don't know if anyone else has had this problem before but it's definitely putting me off keeping my stagea.

I doubt anyone else would care much, as they would simply fit a second hand box or repair the one they had.

I don't get what the issue is, it's a 10 year old car after all, and I am sure your box only has a small issue needing repair. You don't buy a rare JDM import and expect gearboxes to be in stock locally, or any parts for that matter.

I would go a second hand box if there was someone here that could program the mechatronic unit. Nissan have told me they don't want to program anything unless I buy the whole box from them

I would go a second hand box if there was someone here that could program the mechatronic unit. Nissan have told me they don't want to program anything unless I buy the whole box from them

I think they call that blackmail.

Is this reprogramming the mechtronic really a thing. Sounds like the biggest load of shit. Maybe if you were trying to put a box from a different model car. But surely if you are putting in a second hand stagea box it will be all good. Maybe I am wrong, but just doesn't sound right.

^That's what I thought, sounds like the perfect time to go manual. If you're lashing out a ton of cash you might as well get some fun out of it once the dust settles.

Was highly considering going manual but would be a massive stuff around changing the foot handbrake to a normal one. Also getting a manual centre console and dash to fit from a v35 might not fit

I never understood how people claim the Autobox in the turbo 33 and 34 skylines are "good up to 300kw". All 3 I've owned have had slip on a completely stock car just with a boost increase to 10 psi. At 7psi they hold, any more than that I can feel the engine pulling more than the actual car is accelerating. People say just buy a new auto box they are cheap but the used ones do the same thing. Maybe I was unlucky or maybe people just cant tell when a auto box is slipping and just think its "good". It will last for many years slipping but you are just wasting power not putting it to the wheels.

It seems pointless to me to just keep throwing stock auto boxes in unless the car is completely stock power wise. The only thing I haven't tried is one with a shift kit, but I was quoted over $1500 to have one installed and at the time it was cheaper to just replace it with a used one but doesn't seem to be the case as you are just spending money for the same problem. The clutch packs in the stock auto box just don't hold on hard enough imo. Afterwards I figured shift kit actually press the clutches together harder thus allowing more power to be transferred to the wheels and preventing wearing out the clutch packs. I think I figured this out too late as I assumed shift kit just makes the autobox transition from one gear to the next faster, i.e "slam the gears", not able to make it hold more power. If that's the case this is how they should come factory as in stock form the they are really lax.

I never understood how people claim the Autobox in the turbo 33 and 34 skylines are "good up to 300kw". All 3 I've owned have had slip on a completely stock car just with a boost increase to 10 psi. At 7psi they hold, any more than that I can feel the engine pulling more than the actual car is accelerating. People say just buy a new auto box they are cheap but the used ones do the same thing. Maybe I was unlucky or maybe people just cant tell when a auto box is slipping and just think its "good". It will last for many years slipping but you are just wasting power not putting it to the wheels.

It seems pointless to me to just keep throwing stock auto boxes in unless the car is completely stock power wise. The only thing I haven't tried is one with a shift kit, but I was quoted over $1500 to have one installed and at the time it was cheaper to just replace it with a used one but doesn't seem to be the case as you are just spending money for the same problem. The clutch packs in the stock auto box just don't hold on hard enough imo. Afterwards I figured shift kit actually press the clutches together harder thus allowing more power to be transferred to the wheels and preventing wearing out the clutch packs. I think I figured this out too late as I assumed shift kit just makes the autobox transition from one gear to the next faster, i.e "slam the gears", not able to make it hold more power. If that's the case this is how they should come factory as in stock form the they are really lax.

If the clutches and bands are genuinely slipping, its hard to imagine it lasting years in that state. You'd be wearing the friction material off, like riding the clutch in a manual.

There is lucky to be half a mm of material on the clutches, one good slip and she's toast in most cases. I know as I have been there twice now, and building an auto isn't cheap.

A shift kit is like increasing the tension on a manual clutch pressure plate springs, much less likely to slip, but when it does there is even more heat involved. A built box includes placing extra clutch plates (power clutch packs) to help increase the surface area, similar to installing a twin plate manual clutch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...