Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi there all. just thought this new post might be a good guide for others out there who are looking for approximate power gained from mods done to our cars. may it be a simple air filter or manual boost controller, to an all out rebuilt motor or T88......if you have one :( ..hahah

well i guess being the first to start this new thread off, i'll start with what i have. don't ask me about the power though as will be getting a pfc soon to go with new engine :(

- turbo back TRUST exhaust

- Hybrid/Calsonic Front mount (miniature type haha)

- Mines ECU

- Turbo Dynamics turbo (Don't know rating or the A/R ratios sorry)

- boost controller (hose clamp :( hahahhAHAHHA)

...no idea what these mods will give me in power, so how bout an estimate aye people? <_<......i was hoping for around 180kw atw at this stage of time. not sure about my injectors or anything else. pretty much got a motor, threw it in, and drove away.

i am in the process of sticking in a new RB25DET NEO :lol: into my car instead to see if the valve timing will alter anything. perhaps fuel economy?

was reading up the ECU tuning threads, and seems as though that tuning a PFC will lean to the $450-550 mark. is that about right?.....i live in sydney, so not sure whereabouts to get the tuning done, but seems as though HITMAN does a good job for decent pricing aye? coz im might also get a T03/04 turbo as well, so not sure what to do at this point in life..sigh:(........i hate being stranded on money with so much on the "to-do" list....oh ..chinese new year..heahe...red pockets please? :D

so if everyone can just state mods and current power, as well as state of tune that'd be greatly appreciated!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/102968-power-we-are-making/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

My car is getting tuned tomorrow after some serious work has been put in.......estimating just from now anywhere between 330-380rwhp :) So to answer your question in kw thats high 200's??? hahaha I dunno

^ 261rwkw with a GT-RS.

that looks like 17-18psi on the chart then it drops off a bit, is that about right?

I made 230-240 at 15psi with pretty much the same setup.

anyone know if internals are safe at 18psi? if so, might ramp mine up a bit :D

nice one.

Edited by Beeble

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...