Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

This is what the one from APC looks like.

The difference is that this looks like it is meant to be there and it is apparently identical to the GREDDY manifold but takes the standard injectors (not standard throttle body).

That APC one is looks no different to a Greddy Plenum!

I'd say it is a greddy plenum!

Edited by B33st

call them

http://www.apc-racing.com/

this one is cheaper (around $700) than the greddy (around $1100) and i am told that the greddy wont take the standard injectors because of where the fuel feed is where this one will.

All i want to know is if someone has used one of them, if they have had any problems and if they have had good results.

Edited by R33NT

hi guys could you help me out i'm stuck over here in the uk freezing my arse off i've been following this thread with interest as we don't have anyone in the uk that does manifolds could someone post links up to the manufactures website cheers guys

yeah i run the plazmaman plenum on my rb25. It seems to work well, with very very quick throttle response and no lag.

I don't think i have quite that power that the other one on the dyno has..

But i've only got cooler', pod, and cat-back. :blink:

This is what the one from APC looks like.

The difference is that this looks like it is meant to be there and it is apparently identical to the GREDDY manifold but takes the standard injectors (not standard throttle body).

That looks exactly the same as the GREDDY as you said, can anyone confirm that it is THE SAME plenum without the name logo and the expensive price tag?

I have seen it, it isnt a GREDDY and it is not that expensive but i want to know performance.

I was told by APC several customer cars ran this plenum. I guess they could be VL's but i was hoping for a couple SAU members.

Edited by R33NT

Are you sire you cant use a std fuel rail with the Greddy? I know of one that uses a std GTR rail, adn he is only using that so he can use the injectors, so if the GTR rail fits the std manifold and the Greddy, then i say the Greddy would have no problem with the std RB25DET fuel rail

Bont Blitz make an apaptor these days so the RB25 can run a complete RB26 inlet and throttle bodies...much better option in my eyes considering the price that the std GTR goes for

Bont Blitz make an apaptor these days so the RB25 can run a complete RB26 inlet and throttle bodies...much better option in my eyes considering the price that the std GTR goes for

Yeah they do, but it costs about the same (1000+) as the greddy manifold

The GREDDY rb25 plenum still uses the standard fuel rail.  Fitted on mine with no problems.

ahh, cool. Dunno where i got that from then.

These APC ones look pretty good for the price. If i wanted more than 300rwkw, then id consider to buy one :P

std injectors and rail fits these plenums

Which is what i said back here about std rail and injectors... we ran a std RB25DET rail on a mates car with GReddy plenum and i am running top feed RB26 injectors on mine, it just depends on which injector seat you use (there is a step down in the plenum to suit each injector)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
×
×
  • Create New...