Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

To gauge the general consensus as to how my engine came to be in its current condition I thought I would ask SAU'ers their opinions. Give me your ideas as to the causes of what you see below. At the least, I might get a laugh out of it as that is all I can do at this stage.

Charlie.

post-4183-1138797324.jpg

post-4183-1138797911.jpg

post-4183-1138798064.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/104196-tell-me-what-happened-to-my-engine/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hard to say with the pics supplied if you have some more you could show of the destruction thatd be handy, and what did the other pistons look like etc?

and could you describe what you where doing at the time, was it making nosie leading up to its death, stuff like that

I wasn't driving and unfortuntely I wasn't anywhere near the car. They are the only pics I have. Cyl #1 bearings are down to the copper, that piston & rod is from # 6. The rest appear to be fine.

The clues are in the LH photo. The question is whether the debris/parts were found 'as shown' (ie with bolts separated as shown), and if that is the case, how is it that one bolt appears remarkably undamaged given the extensive damage to the conrod ??.

bearings down to copper suggest oil starvation then had the bearing seize, which forced the piston onto the side of the bore, jamming it there which forced the bolts out as the crank continued round..

my opinoin is either

1) As stated by craved oil starvation caused a bearing to lockup

2) Rod bolts were not torqued to the correct specs meaning one of the bolts came loose causing the rod to jam on the crank as the crank turned it wedged the rod/piston against the bore and with no where to go the rod bent and i think it is safe to assume that the broken part of the conrods bigend is the part that put the hole in the block.

Just my 2 cents

my opinoin is either

1) As stated by craved oil starvation caused a bearing to lockup

2) Rod bolts were not torqued to the correct specs meaning one of the bolts came loose causing the rod to jam on the crank as the crank turned it wedged the rod/piston against the bore and with no where to go the rod bent and i think it is safe to assume that the broken part of the conrods bigend is the part that put the hole in the block.

Just my 2 cents

i would have to agree with you on the 2nd one.

in that one pic it looks like there is a WHOLE rod bolt, so my guess is that something was not torqued down on that rod and when it loosened it ate the bearing and killed the rod.

that sucks a large one there mate, i would consult the engine builder and raise hell as that (to me atleast) looks like some one didnt check the torque specs on the rod bolts.

were those tomei rods?

I know it doesnt help, but this is why I have a strong belief that workshops have their limitations since most of the specalist work engines/gearbox rebuilds is handled by a third party. I personally prefer to use

1) Dedicated engine builder

2) Good mechanic familiar with the car

3) Good tuner whether independant or a workshop

In the pic on the left there is a bolt there that has been snapped, is the other half still in the big end cap? if so then theres your answer, the bolt broke opening up the bearings crankshaft came out of the conrod piston stopped then when crank came around again smashed into hanging conrod and bearing and hey presto! total utter CHAOS!

BTW assuming you are going to follow this up with the builder, you need to get the motor and all bits back asap and take them to a 3rd party specialist, there are companies around who specialise in investigating and acting as specialist witnesses if it comes to that

Well maybe the engine was just on its way out due to bearing wear, it is very hard to diagnose a failure like this on an engine which has been in use for some time.

NXTIME when you say you had a problem with the engine what was the problem? and what did the workshop do to rectify this?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...