Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some facts on KKR, to help reduce some of the confusion.

Yes they are a plain bearing or 'bush' type turbo. A lot of people put too much weight on this specification, when really the way the turbo performs on the engine is what matters and there are clearly plenty of users who are happy with the results.

They come with a 6-month unlimited replacement warranty, which is the best warranty offered by any turbo manufacturer to our knowledge.

They are not the same as the many 'ebay turbos' that have been mentioned. These are manufactured by a company which builds turbos for various European OEM customers, using all German machines.

They are not a direct bolt-on for any particular engine, but the work required to fit a KKR430 or KKR480 to an RB20 or RB25 is not very complicated and the whole job can be done in half a day. It is true that with a dump pipe and installation the KKR480 will cost $1500-1600, but compare this to most other options and you will find it is still extremely cheap. Remember fitting any turbo, including a 'bolt-on kit' will cost a few hundred in labour.

As for power output, we have seen many RB25s making 240-260kW at the wheels with a KKR480 and 16-18psi boost. We have also seen the odd unusual example making close to 300kW, but given the manufacturer rating of 480hp, mid-200s are a realistic expectation.

We have yet to see any KKR430 turbos used in a high boost application, but with 12-14psi we have seen 180-215kW at the wheels on RB20 and RB25 applications. The smaller exhaust housing and turbine make it less suitable for high-boost applications, but it is very efficient at moderate boost levels.

On an RB25 a KKR480 will deliver full boost at around 4000-4500rpm, depending on tuning, cam timing etc. A KKR430 will deliver full boost by 3500rpm, but both turbos begin to produce boost from much lower rpm.

Ultimately the results will vary a lot depending on tuning and the other parts fitted to the car, but keeping in mind the price, the KKR turbos are hard to beat on a dollar-per-horsepower ratio.

Anyone wanting more information should refer to www.otomoto.com.au or email [email protected]

post-5573-1141261890.jpg

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Some facts on KKR, to help reduce some of the confusion.

Yes they are a plain bearing or 'bush' type turbo. A lot of people put too much weight on this specification, when really the way the turbo performs on the engine is what matters and there are clearly plenty of users who are happy with the results.

They come with a 6-month unlimited replacement warranty, which is the best warranty offered by any turbo manufacturer to our knowledge.

They are not the same as the many 'ebay turbos' that have been mentioned. These are manufactured by a company which builds turbos for various European OEM customers, using all German machines.

They are not a direct bolt-on for any particular engine, but the work required to fit a KKR430 or KKR480 to an RB20 or RB25 is not very complicated and the whole job can be done in half a day. It is true that with a dump pipe and installation the KKR480 will cost $1500-1600, but compare this to most other options and you will find it is still extremely cheap. Remember fitting any turbo, including a 'bolt-on kit' will cost a few hundred in labour.

As for power output, we have seen many RB25s making 240-260kW at the wheels with a KKR480 and 16-18psi boost. We have also seen the odd unusual example making close to 300kW, but given the manufacturer rating of 480hp, mid-200s are a realistic expectation.

We have yet to see any KKR430 turbos used in a high boost application, but with 12-14psi we have seen 180-215kW at the wheels on RB20 and RB25 applications. The smaller exhaust housing and turbine make it less suitable for high-boost applications, but it is very efficient at moderate boost levels.

On an RB25 a KKR480 will deliver full boost at around 4000-4500rpm, depending on tuning, cam timing etc. A KKR430 will deliver full boost by 3500rpm, but both turbos begin to produce boost from much lower rpm.

Ultimately the results will vary a lot depending on tuning and the other parts fitted to the car, but keeping in mind the price, the KKR turbos are hard to beat on a dollar-per-horsepower ratio.

Anyone wanting more information should refer to www.otomoto.com.au or email [email protected]

Judging by that dyno graph, it shows that positive boost (around 3psi) is made ~3300rpm and full boost is achieved at ~5000 rpm? Is it just me or does that seem a little late?

Ben, on your own website

Tested by Croydon Racing Developments on an RB25DET Neo engine, it produced 242kW at the wheels at 18psi.

297rwkw is 55rwkw more, with 3psi less boost.

On a motor that has a 1.8mm head gasket, i find that also to be quite interesting.

Upto 20rwkw variance i could believe... 55rwkw variance my mind tells me isnt correct.

Also, would you be able to shed some light as to how a stock RB25... which means 370cc injectors to the best of my knowledge... can make 297rwkw?

There is no mention of a massive fuel rail pressure increase that im aware of, being its a stock motor.

Im very interested to know the above as are many others im sure

Ben, on your own website

297rwkw is 55rwkw more, with 3psi less boost.

On a motor that has a 1.8mm head gasket, i find that also to be quite interesting.

Upto 20rwkw variance i could believe... 55rwkw variance my mind tells me isnt correct.

Also, would you be able to shed some light as to how a stock RB25... which means 370cc injectors to the best of my knowledge... can make 297rwkw?

There is no mention of a massive fuel rail pressure increase that im aware of, being its a stock motor.

Im very interested to know the above as are many others im sure

Best to call Jake's Performance for info on the tuning of this particular car. It did have a huge fuel pressure increase as far as we know. As for the later spooling, again this relates to tuning, cam timing, compression ratio etc.

Abit off topic: my r33 made 290rwkw on standard injectors. this was with massive fuel pressure increase and 044 pump. tuned by matty spry in se qld. most se qld people will know who he is. My comment is to support the fact that 360+rwhp can be made on stock injectors but they will be at there limits. Several qld cars have made over 400rwhp on stock injectors and ran into the mid 120mph range down the 1/4. I would say they should take that car down the track to show its potentail.

Abit off topic: my r33 made 290rwkw on standard injectors. this was with massive fuel pressure increase and 044 pump. tuned by matty spry in se qld. most se qld people will know who he is. My comment is to support the fact that 360+rwhp can be made on stock injectors but they will be at there limits. Several qld cars have made over 400rwhp on stock injectors and ran into the mid 120mph range down the 1/4. I would say they should take that car down the track to show its potentail.

have a quick looksy at

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...e=post&id=25136

if you wanna see how this turbo combo compares against some other rb25 turbo setup.s

With a lower BP reading is shows a higher RWKW figure as its in shootout mode. My friend has a dyno shop and his dyno read around 98BP when it was 101BP. I kept on getting high figures approx 10% higher. Went back to the shop when it was fixed and he showed me how it all works ala, now true RWKW not inflated. I'd hate to think of the true lower RWKW of a 93BP reading.

With a lower BP reading is shows a higher RWKW figure as its in shootout mode. My friend has a dyno shop and his dyno read around 98BP when it was 101BP. I kept on getting high figures approx 10% higher. Went back to the shop when it was fixed and he showed me how it all works ala, now true RWKW not inflated. I'd hate to think of the true lower RWKW of a 93BP reading.

Bear in mind that Canberra is comparatively high altitude, so the BP should be lower.

From my perswonal experience there is one particlar e-bay turbo that is BAD - The '50 70' as some call it... This is the turbo on the MX6 link, and has nerouse bad reviews everywhere.

I have fitted the T70 to serveral cars now with excellent results, and seem to fine for long term also with the first that I fitted 8 months ago still going strong. They are rated at 600 so expected to be laggy.

I have also tuned 2 CA1DET's with the KKR 330 and KKR 430, the 430 was fairly laggy on the CA, but the 330 gave me the biggest shock! 206 rwkw @ 16 psi with awesome response.... I am completely confident the 430 would be an excellent turbo on a larger capacity (2lt or 2.5lt) motor.

Summary:

EBay - '50 70' = BAD

EBay - 'T70' = Good

KKR - =Good

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...