Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey ive just brought a manual r32 gts-t rb20det with 77kms and im looking at gettin around the 300rwkw mark im just after some advice on wat parts need to be changed and wat turbo to go with etc, also a ruff price on parts and a good rebuild.

any help would be greatly appreciated thankyou

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/117747-how-to-get-300rwkws-plz-help/
Share on other sites

hey ive just brought a manual r32 gts-t rb20det with 77kms and im looking at gettin around the 300rwkw mark im just after some advice on wat parts need to be changed and wat turbo to go with etc, also a ruff price on parts and a good rebuild.

any help would be greatly appreciated thankyou

gt35r or 40r turbo, manifold, ecu, injectors, intercooler, rods and pistons 2 b safe... AND a good tune.. 13gs later....

buy a 26

300rwkw is a lot in an R32 GTST... Stock Rb20 transmission will be shredded, and RB20DET would be hard to drive (laggy) with that much power.

So you're looking at a motor and transmission swap. Then add turbos, intercoolers, dyno tune, ECU, injectors, fuel pump, possibly differential, probably suspension (springs, dampers, swaybars, strut braces etc) and brakes, new wheel and tyre package (stock R32 tyres will be too narrow for 300rwkw!) which might require lipping/flaring of the guards, exhaust, dump pipe, cold air intake, clutch, manifold, etc. You might want to do some internal work too, if you're keen - pistons, rods, etc.

But do you REALLY need 300rwkw... I mean REALLY? Leave those power levels to the GTRs, I reckon! :P And the VTECs! :(

yeah i do lol well i dont reali but its nice 2 kno uve got it there if u wanna use it im thinkin of buyin a r33 gts25t coz my m8 will buy my 32 4 wat i payed 4 it that way i dont have 2 do an engine swap n that

your power goal is not realistic

decide;

if you plan to keep the 32 rb20

change engine

and how much money you have

then we can help you out,

a 300rwkw rb20 will look like this;

lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag lag power, change gears

kinda useless other than for dyno competitions. have u been in a 300rwkw car? why did you choose 300rwkw? its easily 15k++ to get there.

i reckon this. save up your 10k (minimum for lots of kilowatts) and do a bit of research in the process. then when u have all your cash ask the questions you havent worked out the answers for through research.

research as in scanning through various threads, reading car mags. how stuff works. com etc etc.

james.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
    • Motor and body mockup. Wheel fitment and ride height not set. Last pic shows front ride height after modifying the front uprights to make a 1.25" drop spindle.
×
×
  • Create New...