Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i care not for KKR plain bearing or journal bearing turbochargers.

boost pressure is simply that, pressure for a given manifold or space.

a car tyre at 40psi has a certain amount of air. a truck tyre also at 40psi has a given amount of air. clearly the truck tyre has more "air" as its larger volume despite being at the same pressure

volume does NOT equal pressure

volume of AIR makes power

pressure of AIR does NOT make power

larger turbochargers make more power at the same level thanks to the compressor wheel achieving more compression and stuffing more air in.

the large exhaust housing allows it to spin faster, in turn driving the larger compressor wheel to its required speed to dial in whatever amount of airflow you need.

airflow makes power, not boost.

dialing in more and more boost generally gives you more airflow only whilst you are still in the ideal "island" of the compressor wheel. for the stocker turbo we know that beyond 12psi is out of the effiency zone or island. the net resuilt is that you drive the compressor wheel too fast and it dials in more heat. this results in more and more heat into the engine intake and less air is actually achieved. a lot of people just believe more boost and you'll make more power.

a) talking to a friend and telling him or her your car runs a stock turbo at 16psi

b) talking to a friend and telling him or her your car runs a gt30 turbo at 8psi

everyone is likely to believe a will make more power as street talk, more boost makes more power. this of course is not the case

how stuff works.com

Exerting Pressure

The way a gas like air exerts pressure inside a container like a tire or a balloon is through the action of the air atoms colliding with the sides of their container.

Imagine that you have a single atom of nitrogen in a sealed container. That atom is in constant motion ricocheting off the sides of the container. The speed of the atom's motion is controlled by the temperature -- at 0 degrees Kelvin (absolute zero) the atom has no motion, and at higher temperatures the speed increases. By its collisions with the sides of the container, the atom exerts an outward pressure. So there are two ways to increase the pressure inside the container:

* Raise the temperature of the atoms inside the container - The hotter the atoms, the faster they move.

* Put more atoms in the container - The more gas atoms you put in the container, the more collisions you get and the greater the pressure they exert on the sides of the container.

When you blow up a tire on a car or a bike, you use a pump to increase the pressure of the air inside the tire by increasing the number of atoms inside the tire. A car tire typically runs at 30 psi, and a bike tire might run at 60 to 100 psi. There is no magic here -- the pump simply stuffs more air into a constant volume, so the pressure rises.

I agree with paulr33, more boost does not necessarily mean more power. However, I am still pretty new to turbos, things like the A/R and the compressor maps etc confuse me a bit.

That said, if my aim for 300-350rwhp with the mods previously mentioned, what sort of airflow or boost should I be running? Should I consider a slightly larger turbo? I would like something which hits full boost by 4-4500rpm.

Also, above 12 psi is out of the efficiency range for a stock turbo, how does having the turbo hi-flowed affect this? Is 14psi in the efficiency range for a high-flowed stock turbo?

my mods as follows

walbro fuel pump

Power fc

AVCR

FMIC

Hiflow cat

CES Racing split dump to cat

3" exhaust

When i had stock turbo on it was set on 12 psi

it made 201rwkw

i put my hiflow turbo on myself, not getting it tuned or anything.

i took it too test and tune, and noticed my car was maxing out way to early.

Set on same boost, with the bigger wheels was obviously flowing more air, and my car wasnt tuned to handle it.

Got it tuned, injectors flow rate went from 70% to 90% to accommodate for the increase of air

and afm is on its limit on 5.1volts, or however it works.

Just the difference made by having bigger steel wheels and a great tune

was 201rwkw to 230rwkw.

I believe the efficiency range for a hiflow ( plain bearing) safely is goin to be 18psi .

Ball bearing is going to be more,

and thats for a rb25 engine to my understanding.

and also would slightly change for what mods you have.

Bazr33, it seems that you have basically the same mods as what I am going for. Around 230rwkw is right in the range where I would like my power to be. 250rwkw might be a stretch, 300rwhp (225kw) is my aim, any more than that is a bonus. That should be good enough for a 12.something on the track once I learn how to launch the car properly.

As i said before, one step at a time, I will get the PFC, EBC & FMIC done, then look at the turbo. I may be better off getting an aftermarket turbo, I will consider the options when I have the cash. I asked about the hi-flow turbo because I figured it would be a cheaper alternative to an aftermarket one, but it doesn't really seem that much cheaper...

I discussed the oil supply question with an engineer, he recommended a small reseviour that is pressurised from oil pump and naturally drains to turbo, I really don't like the idea much but he swears by it.

Thanks for that info - appreciated!

thanks paulr33. i knew that boost is not an indication of power, i know a gt30 at half the boost will make more the same, or more power, i just didnt understand how. but with a bigger turbo, it will spin slower, generate less heat, and with less heat u will physically need more air in the same space to generate the same pressure, i think... :D this is what i never understood.

my train of thinking before was that the amount of air was the same, because same boost, same manifold, same ic piping, so i figured same volume. wrong!

thanks again

you appear to have some of it wrong, the larger turbo would need to spin faster as its has a larger compressor wheel, larger means more lag and more intertia to get it moving. i suggest a read of turbobygarrett.com under the tech 101 section and read all the areas to cover the basics of turbocharging and how compressors work

it will cover any uncertain areas you may have

After having a look at the GCG website, a brand new GT3040R or something similar is only about $200 extra than the cost of getting the standard turbo hi-flowed. I think it also has a T3 flange. Would this be a better option than getting the standard turbo hiflowed? Is there any real drawback to getting a turbo like a GT3040R compared to a hi-flow?

is it int gate or ext gate?

does it bolt on stock manifold?

does it bolt up to standard dump?

does it require different oil and water lines?

does it fit only in highmount mode?

does the standard afm to turbo duct fit on?

drawbacks;

as above with lots of extra lag

The point that a lot of people miss when discussing the bigger turbos is the fact the exhaust side is also bigger, this is what allows the flow to be greater, not the fact it's just got a bigger compressor....that alone wouldn't account for much.

Restriction in the system is what gives you your boost pressure, less restriction on the exhaust side gives greater flow through the system...this is why you get equivalent power at lower overall psi

you appear to have some of it wrong, the larger turbo would need to spin faster as its has a larger compressor wheel, larger means more lag and more intertia to get it moving. i suggest a read of turbobygarrett.com under the tech 101 section and read all the areas to cover the basics of turbocharging and how compressors work

it will cover any uncertain areas you may have

My understanding is that the larger the impeller, the slower it needs to (or can) spin. It's about the speed of the wheel at the blade tips. The larger diameter, the higher the tip speed for a given rpm. All existing literature I have seen has mentioned a critical tip speed of Mach 1.

The turbobygarrett.com site will allow you to check compressor maps of different sized impellers to highlight what I'm suggesting. Garrett have provided a large amount of information and it is well worth the read.

Inertia is a function of mass and diameter of the impeller, so larger, heavier wheels take more to get going - shows itself as lag. It's comparatively easy to choose a turbo that generates X amount of power; getting one that responds well across a wide range of engine rpm is harder - keeps engineers gainfully employed.

cheers

Dale

thats what i thought, coz with bigger wheels, they are moving faster, but only at the outer edges, and not only that, the comp wheel itself is physically bigger, meaning it would move more air with one rotation.

think of a recirculating fans, the ones u used before u had aircon in the house, i've got two right here, one thats about 50cm across( big floor standing one), and one thats about 20cm (like a littel desktop one). the small one spins very fast and makes heaps of noise and moves moderate amounts of air, the big one is lazy, spins slower, makes less noise (well, a deeper noise anyway) and moves heaps of air. i know a room fan isnt a turbo, but thats my train of thought on it anyway

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Maf is a question mark but TPS  I have set at 0.47, the fact that I’m getting proper voltage range out of it with the key on leads me to believe it’s functioning properly. I’m getting proper voltages on basically everything. I still need to look up voltage ranges for z32 maf and test that 
    • Honestly no not at all, but it’s a very basic tune, it’s stock injectors q45 tps and z32 maf. Other than that it’s a completely stock base map. The file is from nistune and from my understanding if it was tune related I would be able to unplug maf and tps and it would still start even if it was a really shitty start. I have tried starting it with coolant temp, maf, and tps unplugged none of those 3 togethor or individually changes anything 
    • 🏆 Skyline Supremacy Meets Mount Panorama Magic 🏆 Join SAU NSW as we take the long way to Bathurst, the home of GTR greatness. Saturday 30th August 2025 7:00AM Meeting Hanna Park North Richmond 7:30AM Departure Cruise Via Bells of Line Road 9:00AM Arrival to Stop 1: Golden Poplars Meadow Flat 9:45AM Arrival to Final Destination: Mount Panorama Motor Racing Circuit Meet Location: Hanna Park North Richmond Stop 1: Golden Poplars Meadow Flat Final Destination: Mount Panorama Motor Racing Circuit   *Disclaimer* There will be a lead and follow car so no one should get lost. If you would like to attend or bring others along please put your name down and a +1 as numbers will be needed prior! This is NOT a race and we will all be adhering to all road rules. If this is what you want please come to one of our many track days. This is an official SAU:NSW event and will be run under a CAMS permit. One of the things that really sets our club apart is our commitment to being true enthusiasts. When on normal roads we strive to maintain good relations with the authorities as well as the public in general. When attending one of Skylines Australia NSW events please try to: • Be aware of surrounding environment and act accordingly. • Drive courteously on the state’s roads as a true enthusiast should. • Understand how important it is to maintain the good name of SAU NSW and thus, treat others accordingly. • Any misbehavior will not be tolerated and you will be asked to leave.
    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day   Highway gets as low as 10l/100km on my end so I'm not as worried about it being a mechanical issue. More likely just the tune on the haltech.
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
×
×
  • Create New...