Jump to content
SAU Community

Need Insurance? Want Cheaper Insurance?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 904
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

JUST when you think you've found a loop-hole, you go and discover they've already got that angle covered off... sneaky bastards!

" The use, misuse, or existence of nuclear weapons or the

use, misuse, escape or existence of nuclear fuel, waste or

materials or ionising radiation or contamination from such

fuels, waste or materials, or the combustion, detonation,

fission and/or fusion of nuclear fuel or nuclear materials"

:D

On a serious note, i too have recently got a LSV quote and it's about half price of Shannons, was VERY VERY surprised. Agreed value not quite as much, but if it seems they hang onto that value longer then i'll probably do better than with Shannons dropping it quite quickly from experience with prev cars.

I rang just then to query the 'modifications' exclusion and it sounds to me more like they would do the old "if it didn't contribute to the accident/incident, we don't care". Yes, the PDS specifically states...

Undisclosed and illegal modifications

your vehicle if it has any:

• modification which you have not told us about; and we would not

have agreed to cover your vehicle if the modification had been

disclosed to us;

• modification which is not permitted by law in the State or Territory in

which your vehicle is registered;

• modification which would prevent your vehicle from being

legally registered in the State of Territory in which you reside, unless

your vehicle is unregistered, you have provided full details of the

modification to us, and we have agreed to cover your vehicle.

But i believe that is similar to Just Cars, although they just say, unlimited legal mods, JC is obviously covering claims where say someone has an accident but has an atmo BOV. It sounds like there is a common sense type test applied in the assessing of the claim.

I'm going to double check again with the guy who has been quoting me for the car, but that's what i've got so far from the guys on the phone

It's a tough one...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are signing a contract, the contract doesn't have to be law abiding. If you tell them about ALL of your illegal mods and they decide to cover you still then they have to pay out.

If you don't tell them about the mods they can just turn around and go "we wouldn't have covered you if you told us about that mod" and void your claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are signing a contract, the contract doesn't have to be law abiding. If you tell them about ALL of your illegal mods and they decide to cover you still then they have to pay out.

If you don't tell them about the mods they can just turn around and go "we wouldn't have covered you if you told us about that mod" and void your claim.

Thats a very interesting point. I will call and ask them about this.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pretty much what i said on the phone, that i told them absolutely EVERYTHING done to the car, i know there's some illegal mods, you know there's some illegal mods, but you've still agreed to insure me.

That's when he said in his experience it's not an issue if it's not related to the incident etc, which is the basically the unwritten rule it seems insurance companies go by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are signing a contract, the contract doesn't have to be law abiding. If you tell them about ALL of your illegal mods and they decide to cover you still then they have to pay out.

If you don't tell them about the mods they can just turn around and go "we wouldn't have covered you if you told us about that mod" and void your claim.

Ha called LSV this morning, enquired about my quote a few weeks earlier... found out that there was no record on there system of the engine mods that i listed to them in the first instance that they agreed to cover, so be very careful with this, they may agree to cover modifications over the phone, but then neglect to put them in the insurance policy?... They also reitterated that illegal modifications, whether they agrreeded to cover or not, will void any claims. as stated earlier, you buy whats in the PDS...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK so apparently tickets/suspensions etc only count once, hence the 2 I had completely don't count for this years. That, coupled with dropping to rating 1, explains why it dropped so much.

Go figure!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha called LSV this morning, enquired about my quote a few weeks earlier... found out that there was no record on there system of the engine mods that i listed to them in the first instance that they agreed to cover, so be very careful with this, they may agree to cover modifications over the phone, but then neglect to put them in the insurance policy?... They also reitterated that illegal modifications, whether they agrreeded to cover or not, will void any claims. as stated earlier, you buy whats in the PDS...

Yep make sure to read it and clarify anything over the phone, I personally have all my mods listed on my renewal, they stated unless the non approved mods are a cause or factor in an accident they won't void the claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just called Shannons, they're a lot more upfront about it over the phone, like has been said already, don't really care if it wasn't a contributing factor, but...

say the accident is frontal, and for example your HKS turbos are buggered, they would only be replaced with standard items and you would come to an agreement with Shannons about cash difference etc for what the HKS are worth over standard items.

LSV on the other hand seem to be very by the book over the phone, they do tentatively mention the 'not a contributing factor' line but prefer to fallback on, if you have illegal mods then yes, your claim can be denied. Perhaps they're a lot tighter with these things hence the premium difference? I didn't ask about (or was told) cash settlement difference with parts listed and covered, relative to having stock parts put back on.

Surely someone has had a bingle with aftermarket parts and has a story to tell? be interesting to see if people like Shannons etc have replaced different turbo's etc.

rang Just Cars, they didn't have 2002 Skylines listed :domokun: or not for GTR, i dunno, not on the system, and then i told them all mods and were more confused about what to do, so they're going to get back to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok i rang lsv and just car today, im 27 and been a good boy with my licence....

stock 99 gtr

LSV were 910 with 2-3 times driving per week

Just car were 1396

Modded GTR computer, exhaust and intake

LSV were 1400

Just car were 1411

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those that own a GTR (Suspect this is the reason for the "Special Vehicle Excess" which is 1000) and having an insurance with Justcar or planning to, make sure you check ALL the excesses.

I was with Justcar for 3years without knowing about the hidden excesses and got a shock when I saw them this time when I was sent the renewal notice. Immediately I called NRMA up for a quote. Got quoted 1250 for full comprehensive with 600 flat excess. The insured value of the car is only 2000 lesser than Justcar.

My original premium with Justcar is 950 but with a much higher excess (I did that to lower my basic premium) of 1500. But little did I know I have to pay other excess along with the 1500 (I know its my responsibility to read but I would have thought they would advise you of these excess).

If the car is stolen, I need to pay

1) Basic excess =1500

2) Special Vehicle excess = 1000

3) Thief excess = 1000

If I were to make a claim for anything, I need to pay

1) Basic excess =1500

2) Special Vehicle excess = 1000

So in the end I changed to insurer to NRMA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you try Shannons or LSV? no such thing as special vehicle excess and your basic excess would most likely be $500, mines by like that for years.

Tried Shannons but they didnt like my carport with a roller door. Said they wouldnt insure it unless its in a fully enclosed garage which is fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok i rang lsv and just car today, im 27 and been a good boy with my licence....

stock 99 gtr

LSV were 910 with 2-3 times driving per week

Just car were 1396

Modded GTR computer, exhaust and intake

LSV were 1400

Just car were 1411

U lucky man! Im paying $2350 a year that I had to pay upfront for my 34R atm with a *wait for it....* :( $2600 excess..

The things we do to own a GTR :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

U lucky man! Im paying $2350 a year that I had to pay upfront for my 34R atm with a *wait for it....* :( $2600 excess..

The things we do to own a GTR :(

Yea i pay very similar to this unfortunately... if it was stock/legal i would only pay about $990....

I am considering trying to get my car past the emssions test for this reason...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, I need to get this HKS SLD attached to my stock ECU because I've now got the German autobahn and faster European circuits to contend with.  The car is a manual 2dr ER34 with an AT ECU and I've realised the AT ECU has two pins for speed sensor signals: Pin 29: Vehicle speed sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 2) Pin *58: Output shaft rotation sensor signal (Vehicle speed sensor 1) - *RB25DET A/T model only Before I go butchering this harness, is anyone sure of which pin is the correct one for signal adjustment? The attached document from HKS indicates pin 29 but I found this situation mentioned in the following thread on a different forum (R34 GTT Auto Trans Speed Cut Problem | Zerotohundred) mentioning pin 58 needing to be altered by member zephuros, albeit it seems to be for an RSM-GP and the info appears to be old.  R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-2.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-3.pdf R34_All_Workshop_Manual-pages-1.pdf HKS SLD Vehicle Pin out P59-P70 ER34-pages.pdf
    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
×
×
  • Create New...