Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I would have to say its the baby itself, rather than a spirit in the house which is causing the problems... when the bed itself rocks gently, much like a cradle, you have to be suspicious. The baby is rocking the parents to sleep!

Perhaps the baby has a powerful spirit and is just getting used to life in this plane? If that is so then the problems should stop after awhile. You could try making sure the baby is as comfortable as possible when going to sleep and is in general quite relaxed.

I would recommend that you get an energy worker, such as a Reiki practitioner (you could probably find one who could help where classes about Reiki are taught) or a psychic. A Buddhist monk (a senior one who is very experienced at meditation) would also probably be able to help. Pretty much every high-end meditation book mentions that you will encounter spirits and beings from other realms when you get to higher levels of meditation. So the monk could help see if it is an actual spirit or whether its the baby's latent power.

Also don't forget that everything happens for a reason... perhaps this is some kind of lesson in spirituality for the couple. it might not be too wise to get involved too deeply.

Lachie

it could be the spirit of a kid that's always been in the house.

it might not have been threatened when the couple was just that, but when a kid came home it cracked the shits.

similarly, when the sister / husband / kid moved in for the week, the kid may have threatened the spirit.

also, has the kid been present in every room when the incidents

happened?

has the kid reacted at all, or changed demeanour during the incidents?

I used to work in a production house in southern england back in 2000 which was practically a medieval church and deemed to be haunted. The old war tunnels under the town used to lead to right to this church. Anyway I used to do very late nights working alone and on several occasions I'd feel brushes of wind on the back of your neck which would really get the hairs standing on end. Also as it was a double storey I could often hear heavy footsteps upstairs on the wooden floors (I'm the only one there)...very eeeery at 1am let me say!!

  • 2 months later...
ahhh hahahaahahahahah

Hey woman! its not funny - all i saw was something about a puppy or something in jamezillas post and so i expected something like a labrador or a beagle pup - didnt expect that "thing" to appear!! :laugh:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...