Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Just saw on the vicroad website that they have introduced a safe driver reward scheme whereby you get a 25% discount on your license renewal when you have received no demerit points for the preceeding 3 years.

Finally Vicroads have opened their eyes and have started rewarding good, safe driving not just punishing bad, dangerous drivers. My years of safe driving have paid off!

http://www.arrivealive.vic.gov.au/c_driverRewards_faq.html

Oh a look...

9. How is the Driver Reward Scheme being funded?

The Driver Reward Scheme is being funded entirely from speed camera and red light camera fines.

Cool as.

Rhett

Hey all,

Just saw on the vicroad website that they have introduced a safe driver reward scheme whereby you get a 25% discount on your license renewal when you have received no demerit points for the preceeding 3 years.

Finally Vicroads have opened their eyes and have started rewarding good, safe driving not just punishing bad, dangerous drivers. My years of safe driving have paid off!

http://www.arrivealive.vic.gov.au/c_driverRewards_faq.html

Oh a look...

Cool as.

Rhett

Cool.

Now I just have to wait 2 1/2 years.

is this in already? how long has it been in?

haley just got off her p's about a month ago, and dont think she's ever been booked....she didnt mention any discount though..

i get off my p's in jan....and no points lost so far!

Small reward for the massive income from Speed Camera's.

If it was 25% off registration & licence renewal... THEN i would say good on them.

$30 off a 10 year licence really isnt much of a reward when you think about how much $30 gets you... not even half a tank of fuel in some cases.

Ye.

Make it scaled to a "capped" limit or something

2 years - 10%

3 years - 15%

4 years - 20%

5 years - 25% and subsequent years

That IMO would be FAR more effective, FAR more rewarding and gives people an incentive to work towards

If i was boss of Vic i tell ya what the way the Vic Pol is run would be turned upside down and get fairness back into the State rather than discrimination.

But meh... a $30 looks good and is easily funded.

Imagine taking approx $140 off for good behaviour... that would STING the gov't to the extent it wouldnt be worth fining people that werent so good...

Ye.

Make it scaled to a "capped" limit or something

2 years - 10%

3 years - 15%

4 years - 20%

5 years - 25% and subsequent years

That IMO would be FAR more effective, FAR more rewarding and gives people an incentive to work towards

i like this proposal...it would put me in a profitable postion...however the current proposal is nothing but an insult really...is there an election coming up or something...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...