Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

there is probably a specific seal part, there is on the gtr and navara....i dont have one yet either.

problem is if you go silicone you need to be able to remove it again, the factory ones are a rubber seal with a bracket that screws into chasis

Yeah I think that a bit too much of the transmission tunnel was cut away to fit m gearstick in, so I don't know if the part will fit. I'll try and get one anyway, I'm sure I can fit it somehow.

Anywho, the car drives much better with the manual in, I'm so excited. all I need now is to fix the R&R problem I'm having due to my new turbo.

Hey Darrin, I bought a brand new S2 Stagea handbrake lever, through japanparts.com. Was around $140, and another thing, I've enquired about stagea parts through Nissan Aus, and they've told me they're not available, then I've enquired with japanparts.com, and they've been able to supply them.

I'd give them a try, takes no longer than through nissan aswell, bout 2 weeks.

S2 handbrake P/N: 36010-0V705

36010-0V705 is no longer available, so I have order 36010-0V700 which is suppose to be the same or very similar for a stagea after 10/98

I have order thru japanparts as Nissan aust do not have a listing or pricing for these parts.

Yeah I think that a bit too much of the transmission tunnel was cut away to fit m gearstick in, so I don't know if the part will fit. I'll try and get one anyway, I'm sure I can fit it somehow.

Does the series 1 have a hole at all to start with, or did you need to make the existing hole bigger?

I removed my series 2 tiptronic selector last night and there was what looks like a big enough hole already for the manual gearbox. Also the 4 bolts holes that hold the selector in place line up with the manual rubber boot around the gearstick perfectly.

post-14923-1183592297_thumb.jpg

Ah! that's the part I need! I'm just using some rubber I got from Clarks and some silicone to fix it, I don't think I need a boot that hefty.

This is a boot out of a skyline. All skyline's and silvia's are the same so you can use either one

Terminal, did you have to cut the floor???

Yeah mine had to be cut, so I don't think that boot would fit unless I welded in another piece of metal as Brendan describes. I'm not too fussed on that 'factory' look for my conversion so I'm just going to cover it with some rubber and sound deadening. It's all covered by the console anywho :)

36010-0V705 is no longer available, so I have order 36010-0V700 which is suppose to be the same or very similar for a stagea after 10/98

I have order thru japanparts as Nissan aust do not have a listing or pricing for these parts.

I've just looked through my emails from when I purchased mine, and 36010-0V700 is what I ended up with, it's the replacement for the part number 36010-0V705.

It fits perfect with no problems at all.

got mine back this morning, and it is great to drive.....so much more fun with the bloody auto gone.

The clutch is shuddering a bit I hope that is just the old flywheel i used, but otherwise it is sweet to drive now.

Only one real problem, the handbrake I have sits too low in the console - need to raise it by prolly 1cm so it sits right. Otherwise everything is sweet

well had even more fun today, we knocked out about 25 laps of wakefield park this afternoon, some in the damp, some dry. Gary's suspension is excellent but these cars really need more power than standard. Manual gearbox was beautiful.

But it was a pain in the arse to get moving for hill starts when I was towing the GTR yesterday.....price you pay I guess

well had even more fun today, we knocked out about 25 laps of wakefield park this afternoon, some in the damp, some dry. Gary's suspension is excellent but these cars really need more power than standard. Manual gearbox was beautiful.

But it was a pain in the arse to get moving for hill starts when I was towing the GTR yesterday.....price you pay I guess

Man, I'm hanging to get out on the track in the car, but I want to have all my gauges in first and at least get the suspension mods started. Maybe for the Texikhana I'll be ready... I might have even put the front split/dump pipe on.

Hahaha, as for the towing with the manual, you know what Gary's gonna say...

lol he's already said it, he was there with Matt's gtst yesterday :P Best lap I did was a 1.20, it would have had a 1.18 in it if I could have put together a clean lap....but thats still 3-4 sec slower than an equivalent gtst...you can really feel the extra weight.

  • 3 weeks later...

Got my manual gearbox in last night. (what a pain in the arse. The box I have used is a 93-94 32gtr pull type box which has a speedo cable drive.

The Stagea and r33 GTR box uses a electronic speedo drive.

Most people here have used a R32 box in their conversion, so what electronic drive have you used

The auto stagea electronic drive will not fit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...